Literature DB >> 32070789

Risk of major osteoporotic fracture after first, second and third fracture in Swedish women aged 50 years and older.

Emma Söreskog1, Oskar Ström2, Anna Spångéus3, Kristina E Åkesson4, Fredrik Borgström5, Jonas Banefelt6, Emese Toth7, Cesar Libanati8, Mata Charokopou9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis affects approximately one in five European women and leads to fragility fractures, which result in poor health, social and economic consequences. Fragility fractures are a strong risk factor for subsequent major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), with risk of MOF being elevated in the 1-2 years following an earlier fracture, a concept described as "imminent risk". This study examines risk of subsequent MOF in patients with one, two or three prior fractures by age and type of fracture.
METHODS: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, Swedish women aged ≥50 years with ≥1 any clinical fragility fracture between July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2012 were identified from Sweden's National Patient Register. Each patient was age- and sex-matched to three controls without history of fracture. Group 1 women included those with one fragility fracture during the study period; Group 2 included those with two fragility fractures; and Group 3 included those with three fragility fractures. "Index fracture" was defined as the first fracture during the study period for Group 1; the second for Group 2; and the third for Group 3. Patients in each cohort and matched controls were followed for up to 60 months or until subsequent MOF (hip, vertebra, forearm, humerus), death or end of data availability.
RESULTS: 231,769 women with at least one fracture were included in the study and therefore constituted Group 1; of these, 39,524 constituted Group 2 and of those, 7656 constituted Group 3. At five years, cumulative incidence of subsequent MOF was higher in patients with a history of fracture as compared to controls (Group 1: 20.7% vs 12.3%; Group 2: 32.0% vs 15.3%). Three-year cumulative incidence for Group 3 was 12.1% (vs 10.7% for controls). After adjusting for baseline covariates, risk of subsequent MOF was highest within 0-24 months following an index fracture, then decreased but remained elevated as compared to controls. Having two prior fractures, vertebral fractures and younger age at time of index fracture were associated with greater relative risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of osteoporotic fracture are at increased risk of subsequent fracture, which is highest during the first 24 months following a fracture. Younger women and those with vertebral fractures are at greatest relative risk, suggesting that treatment should target these patients and be timely enough to impact the period of imminent risk.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture incidence; Fragility fracture; Imminent risk; Osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32070789     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  7 in total

1.  To screen or not to screen for osteoporosis amongst post-menopausal women with one prior osteoporotic fracture in Greece.

Authors:  Kyriakos Souliotis; Christina Golna; Paul Golnas; Ioannis-Anestis Markakis; Polyzois Makras
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  Real-world evaluation of osteoporotic fractures using the Japan Medical Data Vision database.

Authors:  Saeko Fujiwara; Amy Buchanan-Hughes; Alvin Ng; Jennifer Page; Kenji Adachi; Hong Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Risk factors of refracture after a fragility fracture in elderly.

Authors:  Kaiwan Sriruanthong; Nattaphon Philawuth; Surapot Saloa; Nuttorn Daraphongsataporn; Worapong Sucharitpongpan
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.879

4.  Short time horizons for fracture prediction tools: time for a rethink.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; F Borgstrom; C Cooper; N C Harvey; M K Javaid; M Lorentzon; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  A novel economic framework to assess the cost-effectiveness of bone-forming agents in the prevention of fractures in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Söreskog; F Borgström; I Lindberg; O Ström; D Willems; C Libanati; J A Kanis; B Stollenwerk; M Charokopou
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Efficacy of Yigu® versus Aclasta® in Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Mei Li; Qun Cheng; Ya-Nan Huo; Ai-Jun Chao; Liang He; Qing-Yun Xue; Jin Xu; Shi-Gui Yan; Hui Jin; Zhen-Lin Zhang; Jian-Hua Lin; Xiao-Lan Jin; You-Jia Xu; Feng Liu; Wei-Bo Xia
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of five drugs for treating postmenopausal women in the United States with osteoporosis and a very high fracture risk.

Authors:  C Luo; S-X Qin; Q-Y Wang; Y-F Li; X-L Qu; C Yue; L Hu; Z-F Sheng; X-B Wang; X-M Wan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.467

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.