Literature DB >> 32070163

Assessment of endometrial receptivity during implantation window in women with unexplained infertility.

Li Wang1, Shulan Lv1, Wenjun Mao1, Meili Pei1, Xiaofeng Yang1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the endometrial receptivity during implantation window in women with unexplained infertility. A prospective study recruited 168 women with unexplained infertility and 169 fertile women. Ultrasonic parameters and biomarkers in the uterine fluid were detected. The endometrial vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) were significantly higher in fertile women as compared with unexplained infertile women, and the integrin αvβ3, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) levels in uterine fluid were significantly higher in fertile women. The biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate in fertile women were 20.12%, 18.34%, and 17.75%, respectively, which were significantly higher compared with unexplained infertile women (7.14%, 5.36%, and 4.17%, respectively). Endometrial thickness (ET), endometrial volume (EV), VI, FI, and VFI measured by ultrasound, and the integrin αvβ3, VEGF, TNF-α, and LIF levels in uterine fluid were all significantly higher in pregnant women as compared with nonpregnant women. The best parameters of ultrasonic indicators for predicting endometrial receptivity in women with unexplained infertility were FI(AUC = 0.894, sensitivity 93.8%, and specificity 83.1%). Integrin αvβ3 had the best predictive value for endometrial receptivity among biomarkers in the uterine fluid (AUC = 0.921, sensitivity 96.7%, and specificity 89.5%). Women with unexplained infertility present declined endometrial receptivity. Endometrial ultrasonic parameters detected by three-dimensional power Doppler and biomarkers in the uterine fluid may be effective indicators to predict endometrial receptivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Unexplained infertility; biomarkers; endometrial receptivity; implantation window; ultrasonic parameters

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32070163     DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1727433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  5 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Female Reproductive Function Using Ultrasound: A Review.

Authors:  Zhiyi Chen; Ziyao Wang; Meng Du; Zhenyu Liu
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Letrozole Versus Clomiphene Citrate and Natural Cycle: Endometrial Receptivity During Implantation Window in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Li Wang; Shulan Lv; Fen Li; E Bai; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Use of 'omics for endometrial timing: the cycle moves on.

Authors:  John D Aplin; Adam Stevens
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  The Treatment of Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Female Infertility Caused by Endometrial Factors.

Authors:  Jing Lin; Haoyue Ma; Hang Li; Jing Han; Tingting Guo; Zhen Qin; Liyan Jia; Yuehui Zhang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 5.  The Disorders of Endometrial Receptivity in PCOS and Its Mechanisms.

Authors:  Nan-Xing Jiang; Xue-Lian Li
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.924

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.