Carminia M Della Corte1, Triparna Sen2, Carl M Gay3, Kavya Ramkumar3, Lixia Diao4, Robert J Cardnell3, Bertha Leticia Rodriguez3, C Allison Stewart3, Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou3, Laura Gibson3, Jared J Fradette3, Qi Wang4, Youhong Fan3, David H Peng5, Marcelo V Negrao3, Ignacio I Wistuba6, Junya Fujimoto6, Luisa M Solis Soto6, Carmen Behrens3, Ferdinandos Skoulidis3, John V Heymach3, Jing Wang4, Don L Gibbons7, Lauren A Byers8. 1. Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. 2. Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 4. Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 5. Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York. 6. Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 7. Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 8. Departments of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: lbyers@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although the combination of anti-programmed cell death-1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) with platinum chemotherapy is a standard of care for NSCLC, clinical responses vary. Even though predictive biomarkers (which include PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and inflamed immune microenvironment) are validated for immunotherapy, their relevance to chemoimmunotherapy combinations is less clear. We have recently reported that activation of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) innate immune pathway enhances immunotherapy response in SCLC. Here, we hypothesize that STING pathway activation may predict and underlie predictive correlates of antitumor immunity in NSCLC. METHODS: We analyzed transcriptomic and proteomic profiles in two NSCLC cohorts from our institution (treatment-naive patients in the Profiling of Resistance Patterns and Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Evaluation of Cancers of the Thorax study and relapsed patients in the Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination study) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (N = 1320). Tumors were stratified by STING activation on the basis of protein or mRNA expression of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase, phospho-STING, and STING-mediated chemokines (chemokine ligand 5 [CCL5] and C-X-C motif chemokine 10 [CXCL10]). STING activation in patient tumors and in platinum-treated preclinical NSCLC models was correlated with biomarkers of immunotherapy response. RESULTS: STING activation is associated with higher levels of intrinsic DNA damage, targetable immune checkpoints, and chemokines in treatment-naive and relapsed lung adenocarcinoma. We observed that tumors with lower STING and immune gene expression show higher frequency of serine-threonine kinase 11 (STK11) mutations; however, we identified a subset of these tumors that are TP53 comutated and display high immune- and STING-related gene expression. Treatment with cisplatin increases STING pathway activation and PD-L1 expression in multiple NSCLC preclinical models, including adeno- and squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: STING pathway activation in NSCLC predicts features of immunotherapy response and is enhanced by cisplatin treatment. This suggests a possible predictive biomarker and mechanism for improved response to chemoimmunotherapy combinations.
INTRODUCTION: Although the combination of anti-programmed cell death-1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) with platinum chemotherapy is a standard of care for NSCLC, clinical responses vary. Even though predictive biomarkers (which include PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and inflamed immune microenvironment) are validated for immunotherapy, their relevance to chemoimmunotherapy combinations is less clear. We have recently reported that activation of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) innate immune pathway enhances immunotherapy response in SCLC. Here, we hypothesize that STING pathway activation may predict and underlie predictive correlates of antitumor immunity in NSCLC. METHODS: We analyzed transcriptomic and proteomic profiles in two NSCLC cohorts from our institution (treatment-naive patients in the Profiling of Resistance Patterns and Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Evaluation of Cancers of the Thorax study and relapsed patients in the Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination study) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (N = 1320). Tumors were stratified by STING activation on the basis of protein or mRNA expression of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase, phospho-STING, and STING-mediated chemokines (chemokine ligand 5 [CCL5] and C-X-C motif chemokine 10 [CXCL10]). STING activation in patienttumors and in platinum-treated preclinical NSCLC models was correlated with biomarkers of immunotherapy response. RESULTS:STING activation is associated with higher levels of intrinsic DNA damage, targetable immune checkpoints, and chemokines in treatment-naive and relapsed lung adenocarcinoma. We observed that tumors with lower STING and immune gene expression show higher frequency of serine-threonine kinase 11 (STK11) mutations; however, we identified a subset of these tumors that are TP53 comutated and display high immune- and STING-related gene expression. Treatment with cisplatin increases STING pathway activation and PD-L1 expression in multiple NSCLC preclinical models, including adeno- and squamous cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS:STING pathway activation in NSCLC predicts features of immunotherapy response and is enhanced by cisplatin treatment. This suggests a possible predictive biomarker and mechanism for improved response to chemoimmunotherapy combinations.
Authors: Matthew D Hellmann; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Adam Pluzanski; Jong Seok Lee; Gregory A Otterson; Clarisse Audigier-Valette; Elisa Minenza; Helena Linardou; Sjaak Burgers; Pamela Salman; Hossein Borghaei; Suresh S Ramalingam; Julie Brahmer; Martin Reck; Kenneth J O'Byrne; William J Geese; George Green; Han Chang; Joseph Szustakowski; Prabhu Bhagavatheeswaran; Diane Healey; Yali Fu; Faith Nathan; Luis Paz-Ares Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Milena P Mak; Pan Tong; Lixia Diao; Robert J Cardnell; Don L Gibbons; William N William; Ferdinandos Skoulidis; Edwin R Parra; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Ignacio I Wistuba; John V Heymach; John N Weinstein; Kevin R Coombes; Jing Wang; Lauren Averett Byers Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Martin Reck; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Andrew G Robinson; Rina Hui; Tibor Csőszi; Andrea Fülöp; Maya Gottfried; Nir Peled; Ali Tafreshi; Sinead Cuffe; Mary O'Brien; Suman Rao; Katsuyuki Hotta; Melanie A Leiby; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Yue Shentu; Reshma Rangwala; Julie R Brahmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Triparna Sen; Carminia M Della Corte; Snezana Milutinovic; Robert J Cardnell; Lixia Diao; Kavya Ramkumar; Carl M Gay; C Allison Stewart; Youhong Fan; Li Shen; Ryan J Hansen; Bryan Strouse; Michael P Hedrick; Christian A Hassig; John V Heymach; Jing Wang; Lauren A Byers Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Shunsuke Kitajima; Elena Ivanova; Sujuan Guo; Ryohei Yoshida; Marco Campisi; Shriram K Sundararaman; Shoichiro Tange; Yoichiro Mitsuishi; Tran C Thai; Sayuri Masuda; Brandon P Piel; Lynette M Sholl; Paul T Kirschmeier; Cloud P Paweletz; Hideo Watanabe; Mamiko Yajima; David A Barbie Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Eileen E Parkes; Steven M Walker; Laura E Taggart; Nuala McCabe; Laura A Knight; Richard Wilkinson; Karen D McCloskey; Niamh E Buckley; Kienan I Savage; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Stephen McQuaid; Mary T Harte; Paul B Mullan; D Paul Harkin; Richard D Kennedy Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Robert J Cardnell; Lerong Li; Triparna Sen; Rasha Bara; Pan Tong; Junya Fujimoto; Abbie S Ireland; Matthew R Guthrie; Sheila Bheddah; Upasana Banerjee; Nene N Kalu; You-Hong Fan; Scott J Dylla; Faye M Johnson; Ignacio I Wistuba; Trudy G Oliver; John V Heymach; Bonnie S Glisson; Jing Wang; Lauren A Byers Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-09-01
Authors: Xiangrong Cui; Xuan Jing; Xueqing Wu; Jing Xu; Zhuang Liu; Kai Huo; Hongwei Wang Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 3.989
Authors: Carl M Gay; C Allison Stewart; Elizabeth M Park; Lixia Diao; Sarah M Groves; Simon Heeke; Barzin Y Nabet; Junya Fujimoto; Luisa M Solis; Wei Lu; Yuanxin Xi; Robert J Cardnell; Qi Wang; Giulia Fabbri; Kasey R Cargill; Natalie I Vokes; Kavya Ramkumar; Bingnan Zhang; Carminia M Della Corte; Paul Robson; Stephen G Swisher; Jack A Roth; Bonnie S Glisson; David S Shames; Ignacio I Wistuba; Jing Wang; Vito Quaranta; John Minna; John V Heymach; Lauren Averett Byers Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 31.743