Literature DB >> 32067965

The influence of nociceptive and neuropathic pain states on the processing of acute electrical nociceptive stimulation: A dynamic causal modeling study.

Lisa Goudman1, Daniele Marinazzo2, Frederik Van de Steen2, Guy Nagels3, Ann De Smedt4, Eva Huysmans5, Koen Putman6, Ronald Buyl7, Kelly Ickmans8, Jo Nijs9, Iris Coppieters9, Maarten Moens10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the worldwide increase in prevalence of chronic pain and the subsequent scientific interest, researchers studying the brain and brain mechanisms in pain patients have not yet clearly identified the exact underlying mechanisms. Quantifying the neuronal interactions in electrophysiological data could help us gain insight into the complexity of chronic pain. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine how different underlying pain states affect the processing of nociceptive information.
METHODS: Twenty healthy participants, 20 patients with non-neuropathic low back-related leg pain and 20 patients with neuropathic failed back surgery syndrome received nociceptive electrical stimulation at the right sural nerve with simultaneous electroencephalographic recordings. Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) was used to infer hidden neuronal states within a Bayesian framework.
RESULTS: Pain intensity ratings and stimulus intensity of the nociceptive stimuli did not differ between groups. Compared to healthy participants, both patient groups had the same winning DCM model, with an additional forward and backward connection between the somatosensory cortex and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. DISCUSSION: The additional neuronal connection with the prefrontal cortex as seen in both pain patient groups could be a reflection of the higher attention towards pain in pain patients and might be explained by the higher levels of pain catastrophizing in these patients.
CONCLUSION: In contrast to the similar pain intensity ratings of an acute nociceptive electrical stimulus between pain patients and healthy participants, the brain is processing these stimuli in a different way.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic causal modeling; Effective connectivity; Electroencephalography; Nociceptive stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32067965     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  3 in total

1.  Hyperconnectivity and High Temporal Variability of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Low-Back-Related Leg Pain: An fMRI Study of Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivity.

Authors:  Yixiu Pei; Yong Zhang; Yanyan Zhu; Yanlin Zhao; Fuqing Zhou; Muhua Huang; Lin Wu; Honghan Gong
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.133

2.  Carpal tunnel surgery dampens thalamocortical and normalizes corticocortical functional connectivity.

Authors:  Natalie R Osborne; Dimitri J Anastakis; Junseok Andrew Kim; Rima El-Sayed; Joshua C Cheng; Anton Rogachov; Kasey S Hemington; Rachael L Bosma; Camille Fauchon; Karen D Davis
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-09-22

3.  Case report: The promising application of dynamic functional connectivity analysis on an individual with failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Jingya Miao; Isaiah Ailes; Laura Krisa; Kristen Fleming; Devon Middleton; Kiran Talekar; Peter Natale; Feroze B Mohamed; Kevin Hines; Caio M Matias; Mahdi Alizadeh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.