Literature DB >> 32067897

Midterm Success of a Custom, Non-Fluted, Diaphyseal, Press-Fit Stem Used With a Tumor Megaprosthesis System.

Julia D Visgauss1, David L Perrin2, David A Wilson3, Anthony M Griffin4, Jay S Wunder4, Peter C Ferguson4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High rates of aseptic loosening with cemented prostheses have led to increased utilization of uncemented stems in the setting of megaprosthetic reconstruction. Theoretic concerns of rotational instability resulted in early stem designs with de-rotational mechanisms such as flutes or side plates. However, these designs have their own associated complications, and mechanical data suggest they are unnecessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes and survivorship of an unfluted diaphyseal press-fit stem in the setting of megaprosthetic reconstruction.
METHODS: Forty-five patients (46 stems), with a minimum 3-year follow-up, underwent reconstruction using 1 of 2 fully porous coated, unfluted, press-fit stems between 2005 and 2013: revision stem with adapter to the megaprosthesis (revision stem), or custom megaprosthesis stem (custom stem). Complications were described using the Henderson classification system, and subanalyses evaluated stem-related failures and survival. Radiographic evaluation of stem fixation was determined via evidence of bone bridging, spot welding, resorption, subsidence, and pedestal formation. Four patients had early stem removal for local recurrence or infection and were thus excluded from the radiographic analyses.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight femoral (15 revision stem, 13 custom stem) and 14 tibial (6 revision stem, 8 custom stem) stems were reviewed. Average follow-up was 81 months (range, 42-140 months). Revision for implant-related complications occurred in 7 of 41 (17%), all in revision stems (3 adapter failures, 4 polyethylene wear). At final follow-up, all stems were retained without evidence of aseptic loosening, although 7 of 41 (17%) exhibited mild stress shielding.
CONCLUSION: A non-fluted, press-fit stem used with a tumor prosthesis provided a stable bone-prosthesis interface at midterm follow-up.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone sarcoma; megaprosthesis; press-fit stem; tumor prosthesis; uncemented stem

Year:  2019        PMID: 32067897     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

1.  Short-term clinical outcomes of Kyocera Modular Limb Salvage System designed cementless stems for the endoprosthetic reconstruction of lower extremities: a Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsukushi; Yoshihiro Nishida; Takeshi Hirose; Eiji Nakata; Rumi Nakagawa; Tomoki Nakamura; Jungo Imanishi; Akihito Nagano; Hironari Tamiya; Takafumi Ueda
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty using 3D image-based custom stems in unselected patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Nogier; I Tourabaly; S Ramos-Pascual; J H Müller; M Saffarini; C Courtin
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-12-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.