Gian Paolo Rossi 1 , Giulio Ceolotto 1 , Giacomo Rossitto 1,2 , Giuseppe Maiolino 1 , Maurizio Cesari 1 , Teresa Maria Seccia 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
CONTEXT: While current guidelines recommend the withdrawal of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and renin-angiotensin system blockers for the screening and detection of primary aldosteronism (PA), this can worsen hypokalemia and control of high blood pressure (BP) values. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) values were affected by the MRA canrenone and/or by canrenone plus olmesartan treatment in patients with PA. DESIGN: Within-patient study. SETTING: The European Society of Hypertension center of excellence at the University of Padua. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with an unambiguous diagnosis of PA subtyped by adrenal vein sampling. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated for 1 month with canrenone (50-100 mg orally), and for an additional month with canrenone plus olmesartan (10-20 mg orally). Canrenone and olmesartan were up-titrated over the first 2 weeks until BP values and hypokalemia were controlled. Patients with unilateral PA were adrenalectomized; those with bilateral PA were treated medically. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BP, plasma levels of sodium and potassium, renin and aldosterone. RESULTS: Canrenone neither lowered plasma aldosterone nor increased renin; thus, the high ARR and true positive rate remained unaffected. Addition of the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker raised renin and slightly lowered aldosterone, which reduced the ARR and increased the false negative rate. CONCLUSIONS: At doses that effectively controlled serum potassium and BP values, canrenone did not preclude an accurate diagnosis in patients with PA. Addition of the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker olmesartan slightly raised the false negative rate. Hence, MRA did not seem to endanger the accuracy of the diagnosis of PA. © Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
CONTEXT: While current guidelines recommend the withdrawal of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and renin -angiotensin system blockers for the screening and detection of primary aldosteronism (PA), this can worsen hypokalemia and control of high blood pressure (BP) values. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether aldosterone /renin ratio (ARR) values were affected by the MRA canrenone and/or by canrenone plus olmesartan treatment in patients with PA. DESIGN: Within-patient study. SETTING: The European Society of Hypertension center of excellence at the University of Padua. PATIENTS : Consecutive patients with an unambiguous diagnosis of PA subtyped by adrenal vein sampling. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated for 1 month with canrenone (50-100 mg orally), and for an additional month with canrenone plus olmesartan (10-20 mg orally). Canrenone and olmesartan were up-titrated over the first 2 weeks until BP values and hypokalemia were controlled. Patients with unilateral PA were adrenalectomized; those with bilateral PA were treated medically. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BP, plasma levels of sodium and potassium , renin and aldosterone . RESULTS: Canrenone neither lowered plasma aldosterone nor increased renin ; thus, the high ARR and true positive rate remained unaffected. Addition of the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker raised renin and slightly lowered aldosterone , which reduced the ARR and increased the false negative rate. CONCLUSIONS: At doses that effectively controlled serum potassium and BP values, canrenone did not preclude an accurate diagnosis in patients with PA. Addition of the angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker olmesartan slightly raised the false negative rate. Hence, MRA did not seem to endanger the accuracy of the diagnosis of PA. © Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Gene
Species
Keywords:
Hypertension; aldosterone; angiotensin; mineralocorticoid receptor; renin
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2020
PMID: 32067030 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 0021-972X Impact factor: 5.958