Literature DB >> 32065958

Effect of emollients on UV filter absorbance and sunscreen efficiency.

Myriam Sohn1, Lola Amorós-Galicia2, Stanislaw Krus3, Karine Martin4, Bernd Herzog5.   

Abstract

The idea of increasing the performance of sunscreens without adding more UV-filters is very attractive. Early studies reported an influence of solvents on the absorbing properties of UV-absorbers which was shown to be connected to the solvent polarity. However, the polarity differed a lot between tested solvents and most were unsuitable UV-filter solubilizers. The aim of the present study was to focus exclusively on emollients pertinent for sunscreens and investigate their impact on the performance of UV-filter combinations. The UV absorbance of Bis-ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine, Ethylhexyl Triazone, Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate, and Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate was measured in suncare relevant emollients comprising C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, Dibutyl Adipate, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Coco-caprylate, Isopropyl Myristate, Dicaprylyl Carbonate. The wavelength of maximum absorbance (λmax) and specific extinction at λmax (E1,1 (λmax)) were assessed for each UV-filter - emollient system. The performance of market relevant UV-filter combinations based on the studied UV-filters was simulated for each emollient with a computational method using the absorbance values measured for each UV-filter - emollient system. The difference in polarity of emollients led to a 2-3 nm bathochromic shift and a variation of the E1,1 (λmax) ranging from 4 to 20% for tested UV-filters. The emollient type showed nearly no influence on the sun protection factor (SPF) of market relevant UV-filter combinations probably due to a different influence an emollient shows on the UVB filters resulting in cancelling of the corresponding effect. Conversely, for all UV-filter combinations the UVA protection decreased with a decrease in the emollient polarity. Whilst the SPF was not impacted by standardly used cosmetic oils, the results advocate to use polar emollients to optimize the UVA protection. This is of advantage since polar emollients better dissolve crystalline UV-filters. From tested emollients, Dibutyl Adipate performed the best for both SPF and PPD factors.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emollients; Extinction; Performance simulation; UV-filters; Wavelength of maximum absorbance

Year:  2020        PMID: 32065958     DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B        ISSN: 1011-1344            Impact factor:   6.252


  4 in total

Review 1.  Titanium Dioxide: Structure, Impact, and Toxicity.

Authors:  Anca Diana Racovita
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Repurposing INCI-registered compounds as skin prebiotics for probiotic Staphylococcus epidermidis against UV-B.

Authors:  Arun Balasubramaniam; Prakoso Adi; Do Thi Tra My; Sunita Keshari; Raman Sankar; Chien-Lung Chen; Chun-Ming Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Self-Assembly of Cellulose Nanocrystals and Organic Colored Pigments as Reinforcement Matrix of Lipstick for Enhancing SPF.

Authors:  Lidan Xiong; Hailun He; Jie Tang; Qi Yang; Li Li
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.543

4.  Colonization of nasal cavities by Staphylococcus epidermidis mitigates SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid phosphoprotein-induced interleukin (IL)-6 in the lung.

Authors:  Jen-Ho Yang; Arun Balasubramaniam; Ming-Shan Kao; Supitchaya Traisaeng; Albert Jackson Yang; John Jackson Yang; Benjamin Prethiviraj Salamon; Deron R Herr; Chun-Ming Huang
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.575

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.