Literature DB >> 32065861

Three-year outcomes after Aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a blinded randomized trial.

Peter Gilling1, Neil Barber, Mohamed Bidair, Paul Anderson, Mark Sutton, Tev Aho, Eugene Kramolowsky, Andrew Thomas, Barrett Cowan, Ronald P Kaufman, Andrew Trainer, Andrew Arther, Gopal Badlani, Mark Plante, Mihir Desai, Leo Doumanian, Alexis E Te, Mark DeGuenther, Claus Roehrborn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To compare 3-year efficacy and safety after prostate resection with Aquablation therapy or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-one patients assigned to either Aquablation therapy or TURP were followed for 3 years postoperatively. Patients and follow up assessors were blinded to treatment. Assessments included International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ-EjD), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and uroflow.
RESULTS: Over 3 years of treatment, improvements in IPSS scores were statistically similar across groups. Mean 3-year improvements were 14.4 and 13.9 points in the Aquablation and TURP groups, respectively (difference of 0.6 points, 95% CI -3.3-2.2, p = .6848). Similarly, 3-year improvements in Qmax were 11.6 and 8.2 cc/sec (difference of 3.3 [95% CI -0.5-7.1] cc/sec, p = .0848). At 3 years, PSA was reduced significantly in both groups by 0.9 and 1.1 ng/mL, respectively; the reduction was similar across groups (p = .5983). There were no surgical retreatments for BPH beyond 20 months for either Aquablation or TURP.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-year BPH symptom reduction and urinary flow rate improvement were similar after TURP and Aquablation therapy. No subjects required surgical retreatment beyond 20 months postoperatively. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02505919).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32065861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  13 in total

Review 1.  Indications, techniques, and role of new minimally invasive benign prostate hyperplasia surgical options.

Authors:  Serdar Yalçın; Lütfi Tunç
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-07-02

2.  Rectal perforation after aquablation of the prostate: lessons learned the hard way.

Authors:  A J Gross; M J Lipp; R Baumbach; B Becker; K Vogt; C Rosenbaum; C Netsch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Urethral stricture following endoscopic prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials.

Authors:  Giacomo Maria Pirola; Daniele Castellani; Ee Jean Lim; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Dong Le Quy Nguyen; Marilena Gubbiotti; Emanuele Rubilotta; Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Mariela Corrales; Esther García Rojo; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Vineet Gauhar
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Minimally invasive treatment options for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

Authors:  J Franz; R Suarez-Ibarrola; D S Schoeb; C Gratzke; A Miernik
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  CUA 2022 Annual Meeting Abstracts - Podium Session 1: BPH, GU Trauma and Reconstruction, Neurogenic Bladder, Urinary Incontinence and Voiding Dysfunction, Pediatrics Friday, June 24, 2022 • 13:30-14:30.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

6.  Functional and surgical outcomes of Aquablation in elderly men.

Authors:  Brendan L Raizenne; David Bouhadana; Kevin C Zorn; Neil Barber; Peter Gilling; Steven Kaplan; Gopal Badlani; Bilal Chughtai; Dean Elterman; Naeem Bhojani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 7.  Minimally Invasive Therapies for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Review of Currently Available Techniques Including Prostatic Artery Embolization, Water Vapor Thermal Therapy, Prostatic Urethral Lift, Temporary Implantable Nitinol Device and Aquablation.

Authors:  Tiago Bilhim; Patrick Betschart; Pavel Lyatoshinsky; Gautier Müllhaupt; Dominik Abt
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Reasons to overthrow TURP: bring on Aquablation.

Authors:  Iman Sadri; Adel Arezki; Félix Couture; David-Dan Nguyen; Russell Schwartz; Ahmed S Zakaria; Dean Elterman; Enrique Rijo; Vincent Misrai; Thorsten Bach; Claus G Roehrborn; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Initial single centre experience of Aquablation of the prostate using the AquaBeam system with athermal haemostasis for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 1-year outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle Whiting; Keng Lim Ng; Neil Barber
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prostatic Urethral Lift for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Peng Xiang; Mingdong Wang; Di Guan; Dan Liu; Yonghui Wang; Yongxiu Hao; Shuang Li; Yuexin Liu; Hao Ping
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.