| Literature DB >> 32065708 |
Janine George1, David Waroquiers1, Davide Di Stefano1, Guido Petretto1, Gian-Marco Rignanese1, Geoffroy Hautier1.
Abstract
The Pauling rules have been used for decades to rationalise the crystal structures of ionic compounds. Despite their importance, there has been no statistical assessment of the performances of these five empirical rules so far. Here, we rigorously and automatically test all five Pauling rules for a large data set of around 5000 known oxides. We discuss each Pauling rule separately, stressing their limits and range of application in terms of chemistries and structures. We conclude that only 13 % of the oxides simultaneously satisfy the last four rules, indicating a much lower predictive power than expected.Entities:
Keywords: computational chemistry; coordination environments; materials informatics; solid-state structures
Year: 2020 PMID: 32065708 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202000829
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 15.336