| Literature DB >> 32065290 |
Eileen Nicoletti1, Gayatri Rao2, Juan A Bueren3,4,5, Paula Río3,4,5, Susana Navarro3,4,5, Jordi Surrallés4,6,7, Grace Choi2, Jonathan D Schwartz2.
Abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a DNA repair disorder resulting from mutations in genes encoding for FA DNA repair complex components and is characterized by variable congenital abnormalities, bone marrow failure (BMF), and high incidences of malignancies. FA mosaicism arises from reversion or other compensatory mutations in hematopoietic cells and may be associated with BMF reversal and decreased blood cell sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents (clastogens); this sensitivity is a phenotypic and diagnostic hallmark of FA. Uncertainty regarding the clinical significance of FA mosaicism persists; in some cases, patients have survived multiple decades without BMF or hematologic malignancy, and in others hematologic failure occurred despite the presence of clastogen-resistant cell populations. Assessment of mosaicism is further complicated because clinical evaluation is frequently based on clastogen resistance in lymphocytes, which may arise from reversion events both in lymphoid-specific lineages and in more pluripotent hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). In this review, we describe diagnostic methods and outcomes in published mosaicism series, including the substantial intervals (1-6 years) over which blood counts normalized, and the relatively favorable clinical course in cases where clastogen resistance was demonstrated in bone marrow progenitors. We also analyzed published FA mosaic cases with emphasis on long-term clinical outcomes when blood count normalization was identified. Blood count normalization in FA mosaicism likely arises from reversion events in long-term primitive HSPCs and is associated with low incidences of BMF or hematologic malignancy. These observations have ramifications for current investigational therapeutic programs in FA intended to enable gene correction in long-term repopulating HSPCs.Entities:
Keywords: Autologous stem cell transplantation; Bone marrow failure; Fanconi anemia; Gene therapy; Mosaicism
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32065290 PMCID: PMC7196946 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-03954-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Hematol ISSN: 0939-5555 Impact factor: 3.673
Fig. 1Several mechanisms by which additional chromosomal rearrangements or mutations may facilitate correction of an inherited recessive genetic disorder. The yellow and blue bars indicate an individual gene, with black hashes indicating a disease-causing mutation. Reversion mutations may arise either during or subsequent to DNA replication and may involve transfer of genetic material between paired chromosomes (gene conversion or intragenic crossover) or mutations within a single chromosome (and gene). Gene conversion, intragenic crossover, and back mutations result in genetic correction in one allele within a daughter cell (indicated by the green border and background). Second-site mutations (white hash) result in a gene capable of generating a functional protein (indicated by the green dashed border and green background) in one allele, although the gene itself may differ from wildtype. Adapted from Pasmooij et al. [17]
Fanconi Anemia Mosaicism: Publications Detailing Clinical Outcomes of Multi-patient Cohorts
| Reference | Cohort (incl. Compln. Group) | Age & Duration of Follow-up | Clinical Observations | Laboratory Analyses & Clinical Correlates |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lo Ten Foe 1997 | FANCC unknown | Age 9-30y 22→28y & 3→16y | Mild hematologic deficits in 6 of 8 patients | ▪ MMC-res. in 37-100% of PB lymphocytes ▪ Pt EUFA-192 followed age 3→16y with MMC-res. 0% (age 3y) → 95% (age 16y); clonal hematopoiesis demonstrated by PCR ▪ Gene conversion in 2 siblings (EUFA 449/50) with MMC-res 0% & 90% (respectively) & divergent hematologic course |
| Gross 2002 | FANCA FANCC | Age 6-21y All followed over 3-6y interval | ▪ Hematologic improvement in 4 of 5 patients ▪ PB increases in some pts noted over 3-6y period (platelet ↑ most delayed in several cases) | ▪ Lymphoid-restricted reversion suspected in pt without hematologic improvement ▪ % of MMC-res PB lymphocytes not described (only breaks/cell) |
| Soulier 2005 | FANCA | Age 4-34y Median f/u 5y (1-27 y) | ▪ No BMF or AML/MDS in 8 mosaic patients (median f/u 5y) ▪ BMF/aplasia in 31 of 45 non-mosaic FA pts ▪ AML/MDS in 2 of 45 non-mosaic FA pts | ▪ Normal PB lymphocyte FANCD2 ubiquitination pattern (immunoblot): 1° determinant of reversion ▪ Mechlorethamine 0.05μg/ml chromosomal breakage in PB lymphocytes: 20-56% ( |
Age 2-36y (non-mos.) | ▪ Normalization of Hb/Plt over 1&3 y w/ subsequent stabilization in 1 FANCA pt (27y f/u) | |||
| Kalb 2007 | Age 9-34y (median 20y) | ▪ Mild/protracted hematologic course in 3 pts (1 received androgens) although eventual BMF requiring Xfusn at age 17 & 18y in 2 pts ▪ Aggressive hematologic course in 2 pts (BMF age 4, 5) & death prior to age 10 despite HSCT ( | ▪ Limited description of MMC-res of PBL/LCL ▪ 9-10% MMC-induced G2 phase arrest in in LCLs from ▪ Focus of publication was aggressive clinical course of FANCD2 & hypomorphic nature of many FANCD2 mutations | |
F/u 0-18y (median 4y) | ||||
| Trujillo 2013 | FANCA FANCD2 FANCE unknown | Detailed heme f/u for over 3-22.5y (median 9.5-10y) Age 0-26.5y | ▪ For ▪ Normalization of decreased lineages over 2-6y, most frequently over 2-3 years | ▪ ▪ 5 of 5 pts w/MMC-res alive at last f/u 2 of 4 pts w/ MMC-sensitivity died at ages 11, 18y |
Fig. 2In the cohort of FA mosaic patients (n = 37) with normalized blood counts and information regarding clinical outcomes, individuals were included from the following cohorts: Spain (n = 13), Germany (n = 10), France (n = 8), the USA (n = 5), and Japan (n = 1). Complementation groups of patients identified in this cohort included: Group A (n = 24), Group B (n = 1), Group C (n = 1), Group E (n = 1), and Group T (n = 1); in n = 7 patients, complementation group was unknown
Fig. 3Swimmer plot depicting clinical course for 37 FA mosaic patients with normalized blood counts, including age at diagnosis (when available), last follow-up, and occurrences of BMF, AML/MDS, allogeneic HSCT, and solid organ cancers. The majority of patients (34 of 37) were alive without BMF, malignancy, or transplant at last follow-up. Criteria for normalization are provided in the text and are in general more stringent (exclusive) than those applied by investigators in Table 1
Clinical outcomes for Fanconi anemia mosaic patients
| A. Mosaic with blood count normalization ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Status | Age (y) | ||
| Alive at last follow-up | 34 (92%) | At last follow-up: | Median: 18 Range: 4–34 |
| Deceased at follow-up | 3 (9%) | At death: | 19, 29, 29 |
| BMF | 1 (3%) | At BMF diagnosis: | 20 |
| AML/MDS | 1 (3%) | At AML/MDS diagnosis: | 19 |
| Solid organ malignancy | 4 (11%) | At cancer diagnosis: | Median: 29 Range: 24–33 |
| B. Mosaic with no/incomplete blood count normalization ( | |||
| Status | Age (y) | ||
| Alive at last follow-up | 8 (53%) | At last follow-up: | Median:14 Range: 8–47.5 |
| Deceased at follow-up | 7 (47%) | At death: | Range: 9–39 |
| BMF | 12 (80%) | At BMF diagnosis: | Median: 9.5 Range: 0–47.5 |
| AML/MDS | 2 (13%) | At AML/MDS diagnosis: | 17.5, 47.5 |
| Solid organ malignancy | 2 (13%) | At cancer diagnosis: | 38, 39 |