Literature DB >> 32065016

Nurturing professionalism in medical schools. A systematic scoping review of training curricula between 1990-2019.

Yun Ting Ong1,2, Cheryl Shumin Kow1,2, Yao Hao Teo1,2, Lorraine Hui En Tan1,2, Ahmad Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman1,2, Nicholas Wei Sheng Quek1,2, Kishore Prakash1,2, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong1,2, Xiu Hui Tan1,2, Wei Qiang Lim1,2, Jiaxuan Wu1,2, Laura Hui Shuen Tan1,2, Kuang Teck Tay1,2, Annelissa Chin3, Ying Pin Toh4, Stephen Mason5, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna1,2,5,6,7.   

Abstract

Introduction: Professionalism is an evolving, socioculturally informed multidimensional construct that influences doctor-patient relationships, patient satisfaction and care outcomes. However, despite its clinical significance there is little consistency in how professionalism is nurtured amongst medical students. To address this gap a systemic scoping review of nurturing professionalism in medical schools, is proposed.
Methods: Levac's framework and the PRISMA-P 2015 checklist underpinned a 6-stage systematic review protocol. Concurrent use of Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic analysis and directed content analysis was used to identify the key elements in nurturing professionalism.
Results: 13921 abstracts were identified from six databases, 854 full-text articles reviewed, and 162 full-text included articles were included. The 4 themes identified through thematic analysis are consistent with findings of the directed content analysis. These were the definition of professionalism, the approaches, content, barriers and enablers to teaching professionalism.
Conclusion: Informed by a viable definition of professionalism and clear milestones nurturing professionalism nurturing professionalism begins with culturally appropriate training in clinical competence, humanistic qualities and reflective capacity. This process requires effective evaluations of professional identity formation, and the impact of the learning environment underlining the need for longitudinal assessments of the training process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical professionalism; medical education; medical students; professionalism training

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32065016     DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1724921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  5 in total

1.  A systematic scoping review moral distress amongst medical students.

Authors:  Rui Song Ryan Ong; Ruth Si Man Wong; Ryan Choon Hoe Chee; Chrystie Wan Ning Quek; Neha Burla; Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh; Yu An Wong; Amanda Kay-Lyn Chok; Andrea York Tiang Teo; Aiswarya Panda; Sarah Wye Kit Chan; Grace Shen Shen; Ning Teoh; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.263

2.  Developing of Multidimensional Perspectives Checklist of Professionalism for Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Students in Assistive Technology Service: Delphi Study.

Authors:  Chia-Hui Hung; Yu-Ming Wang; Cheng-Yi Huang; Chung-Hui Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review.

Authors:  Lauren A Maggio; Kelsey Larsen; Aliki Thomas; Joseph A Costello; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Warren Fong; Yu Heng Kwan; Sungwon Yoon; Jie Kie Phang; Julian Thumboo; Ying Ying Leung; Swee Cheng Ng
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Medical professionalism research characteristics and hotspots: a 10-year bibliometric analysis of publications from 2010 to 2019.

Authors:  Xinzhi Song; Nan Jiang; Honghe Li; Ning Ding; Deliang Wen
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.238

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.