| Literature DB >> 32064781 |
Qi Shen1, Bin Shang1, Bin Jiang1, Yu Wang1, Zhou Wang1, Gang Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the expression and biological function of JAB1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).Entities:
Keywords: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; JAB1; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32064781 PMCID: PMC7113044 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
Figure 1Expression of JAB1 in ESCC and its relationship with overall survival time of patients. (a) Immunohistochemical staining of JAB1 (magnification × 200). Scale bars, 100 μm. (i) Immunohistochemical staining of noncancerous tissues. (ii) Weak staining in cancerous tissue; (iii) Modern staining in cancerous tissue. (iv) Strong immunostaining cancerous tissue; (b) The bands of JAB1 and β‐tubulin in eight representative tissue sample pairs. (c) Quantitative analysis of JAB1 protein and mRNA in eight pairs of tissue specimens normalized to β‐tubulin (i) or β‐actin (ii). (d) Kaplan‐Meier analysis and log‐rank test of JAB1 for the overall survival of patients in ESCC. The results are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Correlations of JAB1 expression with the clinicopathological characteristics in 124 FFPe tissues of ESCC patients
| JAB1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Cases | Overexpression | Low expression ( |
|
| Age (years) | 0.491 | |||
| ≥50 | 102 | 55 | 47 | |
| <50 | 22 | 10 | 12 | |
| Gender | 0.523 | |||
| Female | 28 | 13 | 15 | |
| Male | 96 | 52 | 44 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.150 | |||
| ≥3 | 64 | 38 | 26 | |
| <3 | 60 | 27 | 33 | |
| T status | 0.047 | |||
| T1–2 | 59 | 25 | 34 | |
| T3–4 | 65 | 40 | 25 | |
| N status | 0.050 | |||
| N0 | 64 | 28 | 36 | |
| N1‐2 | 60 | 37 | 23 | |
| Differentiation degree | 0.587 | |||
| Poor | 52 | 23 | 29 | |
| Moderate‐well | 72 | 36 | 36 | |
ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; FFPe, formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in ESCC patients
| Parameters | Overall survival | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Age (≥50 vs. < 50) | 0.072 | 1.246 (0.674–2.303) | 0.484 |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 0.639 | 1.174 (0.661–2.083) | 0.584 |
| T status (T1–2 vs. T3–4) | 0.001 | 2.749 (1.590–4.753) | 0.001 |
| N status (N0 vs. N1–2) | 0.001 | 2.830 (1.664–4.811) | 0.001 |
| Tumor size (≥3 vs. < 3 cm) | 0.236 | 0.747 (0.456–1.226) | 0.249 |
| Differentiation degree (poor vs. moderate‐well) | 0.407 | 0.746 (0.444–1.252) | 0.267 |
| JAB1 (overexpression vs. low expression) | 0.001 | 1.677 (1.002–2.805) | 0.049 |
ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Figure 2Cell selection and infection in ESCC cells. (a) The expression of JAB1 protein in cell lines. (b) The expression of JAB1 protein was overexpressed via western blot analysis. (i and ii) The bands of JAB1 and β‐tubulin in JAB1‐overexpressed Eca109 and EC9706 cells. (iii) Quantitative analysis of JAB1 and β‐tubulin in JAB1 determined Eca109 and EC9706 cells. (c) This shows (i) the bands and quantitative analysis of JAB1 and β‐tubulin in (ii) siJAB1‐1, siJAB1‐2, and siJAB1‐3. The results are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3JAB1 promotes the proliferation of ESCC cells. (a) The viability of JAB1‐overexpressed (i and ii) or JAB1‐knockdown (iii) cells was measured with the CCK‐8 method. (i, ii) () OEControl and () OEJAB1. (iii, iv) () siControl and () siJAB1‐3. (b) Clonogenic assays were applied to evaluate the effect of JAB1 on cell growth. The images of colony formation are shown (i). (c) The tumorigenesis ability of JAB1 in vivo was measured with xenografted tumor models (i). The tumor volumes were markedly changed with JAB1 overexpression (ii). The results are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Eca109 () OEControl and () OEJAB1. Ec9706 () OEControl and () OEJAB1.
Figure 4JAB1 is essential for the proliferation, migration and invasion of ESCC cells and molecular markers. (a) Representative images and quantification analysis (b) of a wound‐healing assay of the indicated ESCC cells. (i) The migration index represents migration speed in relation to the control group. (b and c) Representative images and quantification analysis of (ii) migratory or (iii) invasive behavior of the indicated ESCC cells. Scale bars, 200 μm. (d) Western blotting demonstrated that the expression of EMT‐related markers (E‐cadherin, N‐cadherin, Vimentin, Snail and Twist) and P27 was altered with the dysregulated JAB1. The results are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.