Literature DB >> 32064728

Correlation between percutaneous biopsy and final histopathology for retroperitoneal sarcoma: a single-centre study.

Rebekah Young1, Hayden Snow1, Shona Hendry2,3, Catherine Mitchell4, John Slavin2, Stephen Schlicht5, Lumine Na6, Michael S Hofman7,8, David E Gyorki1,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare soft tissue tumours accounting for 10-15% of soft tissue sarcomas. Patient prognosis and treatment recommendations (including extent of surgery and neoadjuvant strategies) are determined by the pre-operative histopathological subtype and grade obtained from biopsy and thus it is important to understand the accuracy of biopsy in retroperitoneal masses.
METHODS: This study presents a case series of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas managed at Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (PMCC) between 2008 and 2019. Statistical analyses were performed to determine correlation between histopathology from percutaneous biopsy and surgical excision.
RESULTS: A total of 117 patients who underwent percutaneous core biopsy and surgical excision of retroperitoneal sarcoma were included. Diagnostic accuracy varied with histopathological diagnosis, but overall precise concordance between biopsy and final histopathology was seen in 61% (κ = 0.57). Biopsy was most sensitive for identifying well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) (sensitivity 85%, 95% CI 0.06-0.96) and leiomyosarcoma (sensitivity 81%, 95% CI 0.54-0.96) and was least sensitive for identifying de-differentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) (sensitivity 40%, 95% CI 0.25-0.56). Overall agreement between biopsy and final histopathology increased with use of PET/CT scan pre-biopsy and with use of fluorescence in situ hybridisation testing on biopsy, however, neither test improved recognition of de-differentiated components within WD/DDLPS on core biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative biopsy is important for clinical decision making in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma. A significant portion of patients with a WDLPS will have a de-differentiated component identified at the time of resection that was not identified on initial biopsy.
© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  percutaneous biopsy; retroperitoneal; sarcoma; surgical oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32064728     DOI: 10.1111/ans.15723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  3 in total

1.  A rare case of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma with multiple limb and trunk lipomata without familial multiple lipomatosis.

Authors:  Jason R Laurens; Adam J Frankel; Bernard M Smithers; Geoffrey Strutton
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-26

2.  Comparing Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and FNCLCC Grading to Improve Pretreatment Grading of Soft Tissue Sarcoma-A Translational Feasibility Study on Fusion Imaging.

Authors:  Madelaine Hettler; Julia Kitz; Ali Seif Amir Hosseini; Manuel Guhlich; Babak Panahi; Jennifer Ernst; Lena-Christin Conradi; Michael Ghadimi; Philipp Ströbel; Jens Jakob
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Updates in Pathology for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Tanner Mack; Bibianna Purgina
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.109

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.