Literature DB >> 32064404

Exploring Possible Surrogates for Kobayashi's Aryne Precursors.

Ana Carolina A Muraca1, Cristiano Raminelli1.   

Abstract

A class of aryne precursors, that is, 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates, has been developed through well-established synthetic routes, which allow the formation of arynes under relatively mild conditions. All the aryne precursors were obtained from phenols and 4-chlorobenzenesulfonyl chloride, an inexpensive and easy-to-handle reagent with relatively low toxicity, and subjected to nucleophilic addition reactions, providing addition products in yields of 24 to 92%, and to cycloaddition reactions, affording cycloadducts in yields up to 80%. This work provides interesting insights into the mechanisms of aryne generation. In addition, 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate was successfully employed in the total synthesis of (±)-aporphine.
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32064404      PMCID: PMC7017410          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Arynes have been widely employed in preparative organic chemistry, including total syntheses of bioactive natural products[1] and preparations of functional materials.[2] Accordingly, there are several methods for the formation of benzyne and its derivatives described in the literature.[3] Despite the relevance of these methods in the current context of benzyne chemistry, 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl trifluoromethanesulfonates have emerged as useful reagents for the formation of arynes through a fluoride-induced reaction under mild conditions.[4,5] Moreover, some silylaryl triflates are commercially available, and others containing electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups can be synthesized through well-established routes.[4,6] There are advantages to the application of 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl triflates in organic synthesis; however, trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride is used in their synthetic routes.[4,6] Although trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride is a commonly used reagent, its use should be discouraged since it is a relatively toxic, expensive, corrosive, and volatile liquid.[4,6] From a review of the literature on benzyne chemistry, we found other silylated aryne precursors that were prepared without the use of trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride: (a) phenyl(silylaryl)iodonium triflates (2),[7] (b) silylaryl imidazolylsulfonates (3),[8] (c) silylaryl nonafluorobutanesulfonates (4),[9] (d) silylaryl sulfofluoridates (5),[10] and (e) silylaryl halides (6)[11] (Scheme ). Phenyl(silylaryl)iodonium triflates (2) are well-known compounds that have been used as efficient aryne precursors over the last few decades. The iodonium salts 2 have iodobenzene as the leaving group, but their synthesis involves trifluoromethanesulfonic acid.[7] Even though silylaryl imidazolylsulfonates (3) can be considered an attractive alternative for the generation of arynes, they are obtained from 1,1′-sulfonyldiimidazole,[8] which is more expensive than trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride. Silylaryl nonafluorobutanesulfonates (4) are rather interesting because they generate arynes through a domino process from 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl trimethylsilylethers[9b] and 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenols;[9d] however, they employ nonafluorobutanesulfonyl fluoride, a reagent with disadvantages comparable to those of triflic anhydride. In addition, silylaryl sulfofluoridates (5) can generate arynes without the use of cesium fluoride, but they required the use of sulfuryl fluoride,[10] which is a neurotoxic gas. The use of silylaryl halides (6) is convenient for the generation of arynes because they can be prepared in one step from commercially available starting materials. However, since these compounds employ aryl bromides as the starting materials and TMPLi as the strong non-nucleophilic base,[11] their preparation requires rigorous control to prevent the formation of arynes (Scheme ).
Scheme 1

Previously Reported Alternatives to Silylaryl Triflates and the Novel Benzyne Precursor Introduced by This Work

In the search for a substitute for triflic anhydride, we found studies using benzenesulfonates as leaving groups.[12,13] Cunico and Dexheimer explored 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate in the benzyne generation, but they were unsuccessful (the desired products were obtained in very low yields).[12] Knochel and co-workers reported the formation of (hetero)arynes using halo(hetero)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates. Although this approach employed (hetero)aryne precursors obtained from 4-chlorobenzenesulfonyl chloride, which can be considered an inexpensive and easy-to-handle reagent with relatively low toxicity, somewhat strong and nucleophilic bases were required to promote the halo-magnesium exchange reaction followed by the elimination of 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate to afford substituted (hetero)arynes.[13] Motivated by previous studies, we selected, synthesized, and evaluated silylphenyl benzenesulfonates and silylphenyl sulfamate, which have considerable potential for the generation of benzyne and its derivatives via fluoride-induced reactions under mild conditions, aiming to obtain a novel class of aryne precursors that employs an inexpensive and easy-to-handle reagent with relatively low toxicity as a substitute for trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride, with applications in several transformations and in the total syntheses of natural products.

Results and Discussion

Initially, we synthesized 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl benzenesulfonates 7a and 10, starting with the iodination reaction of phenol (8a), which produced 2-iodophenol (9a) in 40% yield.[14] Then, we performed a sequence of reactions in the same flask, which required only one purification by column chromatography, with the protection of 2-iodophenol (9a) by hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS),[6,15] followed by a retro-Brook rearrangement[6,15] and workup with the appropriate sulfonyl chloride to afford 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl benzenesulfonates 7a and 10 in yields of 81 and 75%, respectively (Scheme ).
Scheme 2

Synthesis of 2-(Trimethylsilyl)phenyl Benzenesulfonates 7a and 10 and 2-(Trimethylsilyl)phenyl Sulfamate (12)

We prepared 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl dimethylsulfamate (12), inspired by one efficient aryne precursor reported by Daugulis and Mesgar.[11] Thus, we carried out the protection of 2-iodophenol (9a) with HMDS,[6,15] followed by an iodine-lithium exchange reaction[6,15] and workup with water, leading to 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenol (11) in 80% yield. Then, compound 11 was subjected to reaction with sodium hydride, affording a phenolate ion, which was allowed to react with sulfamoyl chloride[16] to provide 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl dimethylsulfamate (12) in 87% yield (Scheme ). To evaluate the efficiency of 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates (7) as aryne precursors, we selected as a model reaction the nucleophilic addition of phenol (8a) to 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a), aiming to obtain diphenyl ether (13a) in a reasonable yield (Table ).
Table 1

Optimization of Reaction Conditions for the Preparation of Diphenyl Ether (13a)a

entrybenzyne precursor (7a, 10, and 12)F source (equiv)additive(s) (equiv)solventtemp (°C)time (h)isolated yield of 13a (%)
17aCsF (3) MeCNr.t.240b
27aCsF (3) MeCN50240b
37aCsF (3) MeCN802424c
47aCsF (3)Cs2CO3 (1)MeCN802432c
57aCsF (3)Cs2CO3 (2)MeCN802430c
67aCsF (3)Cs2CO3 (1)PhCN8024<5b
77aCsF (3)Cs2CO3 (1)PhCN802448c
18-c-6 ether (1)
87aCsF (3)Cs2CO3 (1)PhCN1002429c
18-c-6 ether (1)
97aTBAF (1.8) THF0 °C to r.t.30b
107aKF (1.5)18-c-6 ether (1.5)THF0 °C to r.t.240b
1110CsF (3)18-c-6 ether (1)PhCN502414d,e
1212CsF (3)18-c-6 ether (1)PhCN802412f

Reaction conditions: Phenol (8a) (0.25 mmol), benzyne precursor (7a, 10, and 12) (0.375 mmol), F– source, additive(s), and solvent (4 mL) were maintained under stirring at the temperature and time indicated.

The starting material 7a was partially recovered.

The formation of compound 14 was observed by GC/MS analysis.

The formation of compound 15 was observed by GC/MS analysis.

The formation of compound 16 was observed by GC/MS analysis.

The formation of compound 17 was observed by GC/MS analysis.

Reaction conditions: Phenol (8a) (0.25 mmol), benzyne precursor (7a, 10, and 12) (0.375 mmol), F– source, additive(s), and solvent (4 mL) were maintained under stirring at the temperature and time indicated. The starting material 7a was partially recovered. The formation of compound 14 was observed by GC/MS analysis. The formation of compound 15 was observed by GC/MS analysis. The formation of compound 16 was observed by GC/MS analysis. The formation of compound 17 was observed by GC/MS analysis. We allowed phenol (8a) to react with 1.5 equiv of 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) employing 3 equiv of cesium fluoride (CsF) in acetonitrile (MeCN) at room temperature and at 50 °C for 24 h, and we did not obtain diphenyl ether (13a) (Table , entries 1 and 2). However, when the same reaction was carried out at 80 °C, compound 13a was isolated in 24% yield (entry 3). Note that, as shown in entry 3, compound 14 was obtained as the major product according to GC/MS analysis. We therefore assumed that the reaction to generate benzyne (1) proceeded through a polar mechanism after compound 14 was presumably formed via a carbanion 7a′, which abstracted a relatively acidic hydrogen from the reaction medium (Scheme ). Nevertheless, we could not rule out the formation of compound 14 through a substitution reaction between phenol (8a) and 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a). When Larock and Liu treated phenol (8a) with 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl triflate in the presence of CsF to produce diphenyl ether (13a) in 92% yield, they did not report the formation of phenyl triflate,[17] indicating that 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl triflates possibly generate arynes through a concerted mechanism. In addition, Lan and co-workers published a detailed theoretical work suggesting that the generation of benzyne (1) by the reaction between 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl triflate and CsF may proceed through a concerted transition state.[18] Thus, in the current work, we considered how the mechanism of benzyne formation can be influenced by the leaving group present in the benzyne precursor.
Scheme 3

Proposed Mechanisms for the Benzyne Generation Using Compound 7a

In an attempt to prevent the formation of compound 14, we performed a reaction with phenol (8a) and 1.5 equiv of 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) in the presence of 3 equiv of CsF using 1 equiv of cesium carbonate (Cs2CO3) in MeCN at 80 °C for 24 h, which produced diphenyl ether (13a) in 32% yield (entry 4). When 2 equiv of Cs2CO3 was used, compound 13a was obtained in a similar yield of 30% (entry 5).To avoid a possible attack of carbanion 7a′ on the relatively acidic hydrogen of acetonitrile (pKa = 31.3 in DMSO),[19] we carried out the reaction between phenol (8a) and 1.5 equiv of 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) with 3 equiv of CsF and 1 equiv of Cs2CO3 using benzonitrile (PhCN) as the solvent, and diphenyl ether (13a) was obtained in less than 5% yield (entry 6). As shown in entry 6, the starting material 7a was not completely consumed. Therefore, we decided to repeat the reaction, adding 1 equiv of 18-crown-6 ether,[9d] which resulted in the complete consumption of starting material 7a, and diphenyl ether (13a) was isolated in 48% yield (entry 7). When the same transformation was performed at 100 °C, compound 13a was obtained in 29% yield (entry 8). Diphenyl ether (13a) was not produced when TBAF[20] (entry 9) and potassium fluoride (KF)[21] (entry 10) were employed as the sources of fluoride ions, and the starting material 7a was partially recovered in both experiments (Table ). Expecting to generate benzyne (1) through a concerted mechanism to prevent the formation of compound 14, we changed the leaving group present in 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) to 2,4,5-trichlorobenzenesulfonate, a weaker base (and presumably, a better leaving group) than 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a″) (Scheme ). Thus, we performed several experiments using 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (10) as a benzyne precursor. Nevertheless, the product of interest 13a was obtained in yields of ≤14% (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). The low yields obtained for compound 13a can be partially explained by formation of considerable amounts of compounds 15 and 16. Compound 16 was presumably obtained through an aromatic nucleophilic substitution (SNAr) reaction involving an addition–elimination mechanism between phenol (8a) and compound 15 (Table , entry 11). Still attempting to generate benzyne (1) through a concerted mechanism, we changed the leaving group present in the benzyne precursor 10 to dimethylsulfamate (Scheme ). In addition, the use of 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl dimethylsulfamate (12) in the nucleophilic addition reaction would prevent the formation of the undesired product 16 (Table , entry 11). Accordingly, we carried out various experiments using 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl dimethylsulfamate (12) as the benzyne precursor. However, the product of interest 13a was isolated in yields of ≤12% (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). The low yields obtained for compound 13a can be partially explained by formation of substantial amounts of compound 17 (entry 12). Before the reaction scope was studied, silylaryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates 7b and 7c were obtained by a sequence of reactions in the same flask, which required only one purification by column chromatography from iodinated phenols 9b and 9c, and silylaryl benzenesulfonates 7d and 7e were prepared through the production of disilylated intermediates 18a and 18b, as shown in Scheme .[1g,6,15]
Scheme 4

Preparation of 2-(Trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonates 7b–7e

Employing the optimized conditions for the preparation of diphenyl ether (13a) (Table , entry 7), we examined the scope of nucleophilic addition reactions using various nucleophiles 8, 20a, 21, 22, and 23 and 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates (7) (Table ).
Table 2

Preparation of Diaryl Ethers 13a–13s by Nucleophilic Addition Reactionsa

Reaction conditions: Nucleophile (8, 20a, and 21–23) (0.25 mmol), 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a–7e) (0.375 mmol), CsF (0.75 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.25 mmol), and 18-crown-6 ether (0.25 mmol) in PhCN (4 mL) were maintained under stirring at 80 °C for 24 h.

Isolated yield.

10 mmol scale.

Reaction conditions: Nucleophile (8, 20a, and 21–23) (0.25 mmol), 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a–7e) (0.375 mmol), CsF (0.75 mmol), Cs2CO3 (0.25 mmol), and 18-crown-6 ether (0.25 mmol) in PhCN (4 mL) were maintained under stirring at 80 °C for 24 h. Isolated yield. 10 mmol scale. The reactions using 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) and phenols substituted with electron-withdrawing groups led to the formation of nucleophilic addition products 13b and 13c in yields of 51 and 70%, respectively. However, when phenols substituted with electron-donating groups were employed, diphenyl ethers 13d and 13e were achieved in 24 and 30% yields, respectively. In the reactions to obtain compounds 13b, 13d, and 13e, undesired 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates (19) were generated, presumably by the substitution reaction between the phenols 8 and silylphenyl benzenesulfonate 7a, according to GC/MS analyses. The low yields for O-arylation products 13d and 13e can be partially explained by the formation of 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates 19b and 19c in considerable amounts. To provide quantitative information concerning the formation of 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates (19), compound 19c was isolated in 35% yield (Scheme ). Note that, for the reactions involving the preparation of compounds 13a–13e, we observed the formation of compound 14 by GC/MS analyses (Table ).
Scheme 5

Proposed Mechanism for the Formation of 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonates 19a–19c

In the sequence, we performed nucleophilic addition reactions between 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) and halogenated phenols, which resulted in diphenyl ethers 13f and 13g in 80 and 89% yields, respectively. We also carried out the reaction between 2-bromophenol and compound 7a on a gram scale (10 mmol), which provided diphenyl ether 13g in 46% yield. The reactions using 4,5-dimethyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7b) led to compounds 13h–13j in yields of 26 to 76%. As expected, the reaction performed with 4-methoxyphenol showed lower yield compared to the reaction carried out with 4-nitrophenol. We allowed phenol to react with 4,5-difluoro-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7c), and we did not obtain compound 13k. In this experiment, the attack of phenol on the sulfur atom of the silylaryl benzenesulfonate 7c presumably led to the formation of phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (14) in a considerable amount according to GC/MS analysis (Table ). We performed reactions with 3-methoxy-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7d), which resulted in O-arylation products 13l and 13m in 51 and 92% yields, respectively. These reactions were highly regioselective, and mixtures of regioisomers were not detected (GC/MS). When the reaction was carried out using 3,4-dimethoxy-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7e), we obtained diphenyl ethers 13n and 13o in 55 and 78% yields, respectively. These reactions were also highly regioselective, and mixtures of regioisomers were not detected (GC/MS). In addition to the reactions with phenols, we performed the nucleophilic addition reaction between 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl benzenesulfonate (7a) and aniline (20a), which is a stronger nucleophile than phenol, resulting in diphenylamine (13p) in 27% yield. When benzoic acid (21) was used as the nucleophile, we obtained phenyl benzoate (13q) in 28% yield. We subjected benzamide (22) to a nucleophilic addition reaction with 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl benzenesulfonate (7a); however, the product of interest 13r was not obtained. When benzenesulfonic acid (23) was used as the nucleophile, compound 13s was obtained in less than 5% yield (Table ). Next, we subjected 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates (7) to [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions with alkyl azides 25 and aryl azides 26 to obtain cycloadducts 27.[8,22] Azides 25 and 26 were prepared according to the procedures described in the literature (Scheme ).[23−25]
Scheme 6

Preparation of Alkyl Azides 25a–25d and Aryl Azides 26a–26d

The [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between benzyl azide (25a) and 1.5 equiv of 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) was performed in the presence of 3 equiv of CsF, 1 equiv of 18-crown-6 ether, and 1 equiv of Cs2CO3 in PhCN at 80 °C for 24 h, and benzotriazole 27a was obtained in 60% yield. When the same transformation was carried out without the addition of Cs2CO3, we obtained benzotriazole 27a also in 60% yield. The optimal conditions for the [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between azides 25–26 and 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates (7) were evaluated in the preparation of cycloadducts 27 (Table ).
Table 3

Preparation of Triazoles 27a–27l by the [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactiona

Reaction conditions: Azide (25–26) (0.25 mmol), 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a–7e) (0.375 mmol), CsF (0.75 mmol), and 18-crown-6 ether (0.25 mmol) in PhCN (4 mL) were maintained under stirring at 80 °C for 24 h.

Isolated yield.

Reaction conditions: Azide (25–26) (0.25 mmol), 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a–7e) (0.375 mmol), CsF (0.75 mmol), and 18-crown-6 ether (0.25 mmol) in PhCN (4 mL) were maintained under stirring at 80 °C for 24 h. Isolated yield. The reactions using alkyl azides 25 and 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) led to the formation of benzotriazoles 27a–27d in yields of 58 to 63%. When the [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction was performed between benzyl azide (25a) and 4,5-dimethyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7b), we obtained benzotriazole 27e in 52% yield. However, when the reaction was carried out between benzyl azide (25a) and 4,5-difluoro-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7c), the cycloadduct 27f was isolated in only 25% yield. In the reaction performed between benzyl azide (25a) and 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates 7d and 7e, we obtained benzotriazoles 27g and 27h in yields of 53 and 56%, respectively. These reactions were highly regioselective, and mixtures of regioisomers were not detected (GC/MS). When the reaction between phenyl azide (26a) and 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) was carried out, benzotriazole 27i was obtained in 50% yield. The [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions between substituted aryl azides 26b–26d and compound 7a gave benzotriazoles 27j–27l in yields of 31 to 80%. The lower yield obtained for compound 27l is ascribed to the use of the sterically hindered ortho-substituted azide 26d (Table ). In addition to reactions with azides 25 and 26, we performed [4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions between furans 28 and 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl benzenesulfonates (7),[8,10] and the results achieved are presented in Table .
Table 4

Preparation of Adducts 29a–29g by the [4 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactiona

Reaction conditions: Furan (28) (0.25 mmol), 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a–7e) (0.375 mmol), CsF (0.75 mmol), and 18-crown-6 ether (0.25 mmol) in PhCN (4 mL) were maintained under stirring at 80 °C for 24 h.

Isolated yield.

Reaction conditions: Furan (28) (0.25 mmol), 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a–7e) (0.375 mmol), CsF (0.75 mmol), and 18-crown-6 ether (0.25 mmol) in PhCN (4 mL) were maintained under stirring at 80 °C for 24 h. Isolated yield. The reactions using furans 28 and 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) resulted in cycloaddition adducts 29a–29c in yields of 69 to 77%. When the [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction was performed between furan and 4,5-dimethyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7b), the cycloaddition adduct 29d was obtained in 63% yield. However, when the reaction was carried out between furan and 4,5-difluoro-2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7c), the cycloadduct 29e was obtained in only 11% yield. When the [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction was performed between furan and 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates 7d and 7e, the cycloaddition adducts 29f and 29g were obtained in yields of 75 and 69%, respectively (Table ). To highlight the applicability of 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates (7), we employed 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) in the total synthesis of the alkaloid (±)-aporphine (34).[1e,26] Initially, we prepared 1-methylene-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline 31 from amine 30, as described in the literature.[1e,26] Then, we subjected compound 31 to the reaction with compound 7a in the presence of 3 equiv of CsF and 1 equiv of 18-crown-6 ether in PhCN at 80 °C for 24 h, which led to the formation of intermediate 32 in 47% yield. Subsequently, compound 32 was subjected to a basic hydrolysis reaction,[1e,26] resulting in (±)-noraporphine (33) in 48% yield. Then, we carried out the N-methylation reaction of intermediate 33 using formaldehyde and sodium borohydride,[1e,26] and the alkaloid (±)-aporphine (34) was obtained in 78% yield (Scheme ).
Scheme 7

Total Synthesis of Alkaloid (±)-Aporphine (34)

Conclusions

In summary, 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates were obtained by well-established synthetic routes and emerged as a novel class of aryne precursors, allowing the formation of benzyne and its derivatives under mild conditions. The novel aryne precursors were obtained from phenols and 4-chlorobenzenesulfonyl chloride, an inexpensive and easy-to-handle reagent with relatively low toxicity that was used as a substitute for the trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride. All the aryne precursors obtained were subjected to nucleophilic addition reactions, providing addition products in yields of 24 to 92%, and to cycloaddition reactions, affording cycloadducts in yields up to 80%. In addition, 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate was successfully employed in the total synthesis of (±)-aporphine. During the development of this novel class of aryne precursors, we assumed a concerted mechanism for the generation of arynes from 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl triflates and proposed a polar mechanism for the generation of arynes from 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates. The chemistry reported here complements the classic methods for the generation of arynes and can be applied to the syntheses of molecules with interesting biological properties and to the preparations of useful functional materials.

Experimental Section

General Information

The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on spectrometers operating at 500 or 300 MHz. 13C NMR spectra were recorded on spectrometers operating at 125 or 75 MHz. The 1H NMR spectra were taken in deuterated solvents, and the chemical shifts were given in parts per million with respect to tetramethylsilane (TMS) used as an internal standard. The 13C NMR spectra were taken in deuterated solvents, and the chemical shifts were given in parts per million with respect to the deuterated solvent used as a reference. The infrared spectra were obtained using attenuated total reflectance (ATR) or KBr pellets in the 4000–400 cm–1 region. The mass spectra were carried out employing a gas chromatograph connected to a mass spectrometer using electron impact ionization at 70 eV. The high-resolution mass spectra were obtained using a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Melting point values are uncorrected. Microwave-assisted reactions were carried out in sealed vessels (10 mL) using a CEM Discover reactor. Column chromatography separations were carried out using 70–230 mesh silica gel 60. Preparative thin-layer chromatography separations were carried out using silica gel matrix with an inorganic binder and fluorescent indicator. 18-Crown-6 ether was dried and stored over phosphorus pentoxide (P2O5) using a vacuum desiccator. All other commercially obtained reagents were employed without further purification. High-purity cesium fluoride (99.99%) was used in the experiments. THF and diethyl ether were distilled from sodium/benzophenone under a nitrogen atmosphere before use.[27]n-Butyllithium (n-BuLi) was titrated against sec-butanol using 1,10-phenanthroline as an indicator under a nitrogen atmosphere.[28] Lithium diisopropylamide (LDA) was generated following a typical procedure prior to use.[29] Acetonitrile and benzonitrile were distilled from calcium hydride under a nitrogen atmosphere before use.[27] Solvents were treated when necessary according to the literature.[27]

Procedure for the Preparation of 2-Iodophenols (9a–9c)[14]

To a solution containing the appropriate phenol 8 (5 mmol) and molecular iodine (2.5 mmol, 635 mg) in distilled water (50 mL) was added 30% (w/v) aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide (5 mmol, 0.6 mL). The mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring at room temperature for 24 h. Afterward, a 10% (w/v) aqueous solution of sodium thiosulfate (50 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 100 mL). The organic phase was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4). After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue obtained was purified by column chromatography on silica gel 60 using an appropriate eluent, affording the iodinated phenols of interest 9a–9c.

2-Iodophenol (9a)

R = 0.37 (eluent: hexane/methanol (24:1)); yield: 442 mg (40%); off-white solid; mp 40–41 °C (lit.[14] mp 40–42 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.66 (dd, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (td, J = 7.7 Hz, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (dd, J = 8.1 Hz, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (td, J = 7.6 Hz, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.7, 138.3, 130.1, 122.4, 115.1, 85.7; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3331, 3057, 2924, 2847, 1574, 1468, 1443, 1194, 1179, 1015, 820, 746; GC/MS (m/z, %): 220 (100.0), 127 (6.3), 93 (37.1), 65 (67.2), 53 (8.4).

2-Iodo-4,5-dimethylphenol (9b)

R = 0.42 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 575 mg (46%); yellowish solid; mp 60–61 °C (lit.[30] mp 61–63.5 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.39 (s, 1H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 5.08 (s, 1H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 2.15 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.8, 139.0, 138.3, 130.9, 116.1, 81.3, 19.6, 18.4; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3421, 2966, 2938, 1639, 1595, 1394, 1271, 1192, 964; GC/MS (m/z, %): 248 (100.0), 233 (16.4), 121 (40.5), 91 (27.9), 77 (21.8).

4,5-Difluoro-2-iodophenol (9c)

R = 0.41 (eluent: hexane/dichloromethane (1:1)); yield: 561 mg (44%); yellowish oil;[31]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.45 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (dd, J = 11.3 Hz, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.7 (dd, J = 9.8 Hz, 3 Hz, ArF), 151.1 (dd, J = 247.9 Hz, 13.9 Hz, ArF), 144.8 (dd, J = 244.1 Hz, 13.1 Hz, ArF), 125.3 (dd, J = 20.3 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArF), 103.9 (d, J = 21.0 Hz, ArF), 76.7; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3483, 3119, 3057, 1599, 1499, 1483, 1296, 1188, 1136, 866, 799; GC/MS (m/z, %): 256 (100.0), 227 (2.8), 129 (23.4), 101 (36.7), 75 (12.1), 51 (7.2).

Procedure for the Preparation of Disilylated Compounds (18a and 18b)[6l]

A solution containing the appropriate phenol 8 (5 mmol) and HMDS (7.5 mmol, 1.21 g, 1.6 mL) was maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, the volatile residues were removed under reduced pressure (20 mmHg) for 30 min. In the same flask, THF (7 mL) was added, and the solution was cooled to −78 °C. After that, LDA (5.5 mmol, 9.2 mL of a 0.6 M solution in THF) was added. The resulting mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 90 min. Then, the mixture was cooled to −78 °C, and trimethylsilane chloride (TMSCl) (6.0 mmol, 652 mg, 0.76 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 18 h. Afterward, a saturated aqueous solution of ammonium chloride (15 mL) was added to the reaction, which was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue obtained was purified by column chromatography on silica gel 60 using hexane/dichloromethane (3:1) as an eluent to afford the disilylated compounds of interest 18a and 18b.

(3-Methoxy-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenoxy)trimethylsilane (18a)

R = 0.69 (eluent: hexane/dichloromethane (3:1)); yield: 1.09 g (81%); colorless oil;[1g]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.15 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.41 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 0.30 (s, 9H), 0.28 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 165.7, 161.2, 130.8, 116.7, 110.8, 103.2, 55.1, 1.5, 0.7; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3082, 3051, 2955, 2897, 2832, 1570, 1431, 1234, 1088, 833; GC/MS (m/z, %): 268 (40.9), 253 (100.0), 237 (16.5), 223 (61.1), 207 (52.9).

(3,4-Dimethoxy-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenoxy)trimethylsilane (18b)

R = 0.50 (eluent: hexane/dichloromethane (3:1)); yield: 1.12 g (75%); colorless oil;[1e]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.63 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 6.32 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 3.63 (s, 3H), 0.17 (s, 9H), 0.15 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.6, 154.1, 146.8, 123.2, 114.4, 112.1, 60.8, 56.1, 1.4, 0.6; IR (ATR, cm–1): 2955, 2897, 2832, 1574, 1458, 1429, 1238, 1059, 833, 750, 687; GC/MS (m/z, %): 298 (98.0), 283 (92.0), 268 (23.4), 253 (100.0), 238 (8.7).

Procedure for the Preparation of 2-(Trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonates (7a–7c) and 2-(Trimethylsilyl)phenyl-2,4,5-chlorobenzenesulfonate (10) from the Monoiodinated Phenolic Compounds 9a–9c[6,15]

A solution containing the appropriate phenols 9a–9c (5 mmol) and HMDS (7.5 mmol, 1.21 g, 1.6 mL) was maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, the volatile residues were removed under reduced pressure (20 mmHg) for 30 min. In the same flask, ethyl ether (50 mL) was added, and the solution was cooled to 0 °C and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring. Then, n-BuLi (5.25 mmol, 2.5 mL of a 2.1 M solution in hexane) was added slowly. The resulting mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 30 min. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0 °C, and the appropriate benzenesulfonyl chloride (6 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 18 h. Afterward, a saturated aqueous solution of ammonium chloride (50 mL) was added to the reaction, which was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue obtained was purified by column chromatography on silica gel 60 using an appropriate eluent, affording the 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl benzenesulfonates of interest 7a–7c and 10.

2-(Trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a)

R = 0.38 (eluent: hexane/methanol (49:1)); yield: 1.38 g (81%); off-white solid; mp 44–45 °C (lit.[32] mp 114–115 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.84–7.80 (m, 2H), 7.48–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.38 (dd, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (td, J = 7.7 Hz, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.13 (td, J = 7.2 Hz, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J = 8.1 Hz, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 0.19 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 155.0, 140.8, 136.0, 135.4, 132.5, 130.6, 129.6, 129.6, 126.3, 119.2, −0.7; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3092, 3065, 2955, 2899, 1591, 1425, 1377, 1196, 1067, 841, 559; GC/MS (m/z, %): 340 (0.1), 325 (100.0), 166 (30.4), 150 (25.8), 135 (30.8); HRMS (ESI): calcd for [C15H18ClO3SSi]+, 341.0429, 343.0400; found, 341.0425, 343,0402.

4,5-Dimethyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonate (7b)

R = 0.43 (eluent: hexane/methanol (49:1)); yield: 1.24 g (67%); off-white solid; mp 87–89 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.90 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (s, 1H), 6.85 (s, 1H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.17 (s, 3H), 0.24 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 153.0, 140.7, 139.5, 136.8, 135.6, 134.7, 129.7, 129.5, 129.1, 120.5, 19.9, 19.1, −0.5; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3092, 2957, 2900, 2860, 1585, 1475, 1373, 1192, 1085, 827, 588, 484; GC/MS (m/z, %): 368 (2.3), 353 (100.0), 194 (26.7), 177 (24.7), 163 (21.3); HRMS (ESI): calcd for [C17H22ClO3SSi]+, 369.0742, 371.0713; found, 369.0736, 371.0724.

4,5-Difluoro-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonate (7c)

R = 0.54 (eluent: hexane/methanol (49:1)); yield: 924 mg (49%); yellowish solid; mp 64–66 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.91 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (t, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J = 10.9 Hz, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 0.25 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 150.3 (dd, J = 252.0 Hz, 14.3 Hz, ArF), 149.5 (dd, J = 7.5 Hz, 3.0 Hz, ArF), 148.5 (dd, J = 248.6 Hz, 11.6 Hz, ArF), 141.4, 134.6, 129.8, 129.8 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, ArF), 129.7, 123.2 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, ArF), 109.8 (d, J = 20.3 Hz, ArF), −0.9; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3092, 2957, 2900, 1606, 1585, 1494, 1381, 1190, 1087, 1018, 840, 611, 486; GC/MS (m/z, %): 361 (100.0), 202 (35.3), 186 (28.7), 171 (32.7), 111 (44.0); HRMS (ESI): calcd for [C15 H16ClF2O3SSi]+, 377.0241, 379.0212; found, 377.0238, 379.0227.

2-(Trimethylsilyl)phenyl 2,4,5-Trichlorobenzenesulfonate (10)

R = 0.27 (eluent: hexane); yield: 1.54 g (75%); brownish solid; mp 93–95 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.17 (s, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.53–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.30–7.26 (m, 2H), 6.83–6.80 (m, 1H), 0.34 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.9, 139.4, 136.2, 135.3, 133.5, 133.0, 132.2, 132.1, 131.9, 130.7, 126.7, 119.2, −0.6; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3086, 2955, 2899, 1564, 1439, 1383, 1192, 1069, 843, 588; GC/MS (m/z, %): 395 (57.4), 166 (100.0), 150 (46.4), 135 (81.3), 91 (71.9); HRMS (ESI): calcd for [C15H16Cl3O3SSi]+, 408.9650, 410.9620; found, 408.9662, 420,9630.

Procedure for the Preparation of 2-(Trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonates (7d and 7e) from the Disilylated Compounds 18a and 18b(6,15)

In a flask containing the appropriate disilylated compounds 18a and 18b (5 mmol) was added ethyl ether (50 mL). The solution was cooled to 0 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring. Then, n-BuLi (5.5 mmol, 2.6 mL of a 2.1 M solution in hexane) was added slowly. The resulting mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 2 h. Then, the mixture was cooled to 0 °C, and 4-chlorobenzenesulfonyl chloride (6 mmol, 1.26 g) was added. The reaction mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 18 h. Afterward, a saturated aqueous solution of ammonium chloride (50 mL) was added to the reaction, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 50 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The obtained residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel 60 using an appropriate eluent to afford silylphenyl benzenesulfonates of interest 7d and 7e.

3-Methoxy-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonate (7d)

R = 0.36 (eluent: hexane/methanol (49:1)); yield: 1.24 g (67%); off-white solid; mp 55–57 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.78 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.55 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 0.26 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 165.4, 154.6, 140.7, 134.8, 131.0, 130.0, 129.4, 121.2, 113.5, 108.6, 55.4, 0.9; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3086, 2957, 2902, 1591, 1429, 1377, 1200, 1067, 852, 621, 543; GC/MS (m/z, %): 355 (100.0), 180 (49.6), 165 (16.5), 135 (21.5), 91 (7.7). HRMS (ESI): calcd for [C16H20ClO4SSi]+, 371.0535, 373.0506; found, 371.0545, 373.0508.

3,4-Dimethoxy-2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonate (7e)

R = 0.41 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 1.24 g (62%); yellowish oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.79–7.76 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.49 (m, 2H), 6.77 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 0.27 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.2, 150.8, 146.9, 140.7, 134.8, 130.0, 129.4, 127.0, 116.5, 113.4, 60.8, 55.8, 1.1; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3094, 3076, 2941, 2900, 1587, 1574, 1454, 1429, 1367, 1200, 1088, 941, 546; GC/MS (m/z, %): 400 (9.4), 385 (59.7), 225 (16.5), 210 (100.0), 195 (51.4); HRMS (ESI): calcd for [C17H22ClO5SSi]+, 401.0640, 403.0611; found, 401.0640, 403.0612.

2-(Trimethylsilyl)phenol (11)[6l,11]

A solution containing 2-iodophenol (9a) (5 mmol, 1.10 g) and HMDS (7.5 mmol, 1.21 g, 1.6 mL) was maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, the volatile residues were removed under reduced pressure (20 mmHg) for 30 min. In the same flask, ethyl ether (50 mL) was added, and the solution was cooled to 0 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring. Then, n-BuLi (5.25 mmol, 2.5 mL of a 2.1 M solution in hexane) was added slowly. The resulting mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 2 h. Afterward, distilled water (50 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 50 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue obtained was purified by column chromatography on silica gel 60 using hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1) as an eluent, affording 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenol (11). R = 0.46 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 664 mg (80%); colorless oil;[9d]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.37 (dd, J = 7.2 Hz, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (td, J = 7.7 Hz, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 4.83 (s, 1H), 0.31 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.3, 135.3, 130.7, 125.4, 120.5, 114.4, −1.0; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3470, 3067, 3017, 2955, 2897, 1595, 1572, 1472, 1437, 1323, 1246, 1122, 1072, 852, 754, 621; GC/MS (m/z, %): 166 (27.4), 151 (100.0), 133 (75.0), 123 (72.0), 91 (43.2).

2-(Trimethylsilyl)phenyl Dimethylsulfamate (12)[16]

To a flask were added sodium hydride (NaH) (5.5 mmol, 132 mg) and DMF (15 mL). The mixture was cooled to 0 °C under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring. Then, a solution of 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenol (11) (5 mmol, 832 mg) in DMF (2.5 mL) was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 30 min. Then, after cooling to 0 °C, dimethylsulfamoyl chloride (5.5 mmol, 790 mg, 0.6 mL) was added. The mixture was heated to room temperature and maintained under a nitrogen atmosphere and magnetic stirring for 30 min. Afterward, a saturated solution of ammonium chloride (10 mL) and distilled water (75 mL) was added to the reaction, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 100 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue obtained was purified by column chromatography on silica gel 60 using hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1) as an eluent to afford 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl dimethylsulfamate (12). R = 0.40 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 1.19 g (87%); yellowish oil;[33]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.52 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (dd, J = 7.2 Hz, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (td, J = 7.8 Hz, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.05 (s, 6H), 0.35 (s, 9H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.1, 135.6, 130.8, 130.7, 125.4, 118.7, 38.6, −0.4; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3061, 2955, 2899, 2857, 1591, 1566, 1467, 1435, 1371, 1250, 1126, 1070, 868, 841, 750; GC/MS (m/z, %): 273 (1.2), 258 (100.0), 179 (16.8), 151 (21.1), 135 (23.7).

Procedure for Nucleophilic Addition Reaction with Arynes[17]

To a vial (10 mL) were added the appropriate nucleophiles 8, 20a, and 21–23 (0.25 mmol), the appropriate 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates 7a–7e (0.375 mmol), 18-crown-6 ether (0.25 mmol, 66.0 mg), cesium carbonate (0.25 mmol, 81.5 mg), anhydrous benzonitrile (4 mL), and cesium fluoride (0.75 mmol, 114 mg). The vial was capped, and the mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 24 h. Afterward, a saturated sodium chloride solution (20 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 20 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the ethyl ether was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the benzonitrile was removed by horizontal distillation under vacuum. The residue obtained was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography with silica gel using an appropriate eluent, affording the nucleophilic addition products 13a–13s.

Oxidibenzene (13a)

R = 0.50 (eluent: hexane); yield: 20.4 mg (48%); yellowish oil;[17b]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.36–7.29 (m, 4H), 7.12–7.07 (m, 2H), 7.03–6.98 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 157.2, 129.7, 123.2, 118.9; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3067, 3038, 2924, 2853, 1584, 1487, 1235, 1163, 1072, 866, 748, 690; GC/MS (m/z, %): 170 (100.0), 141 (59.4), 115 (14.2), 77 (31.4), 51 (25.4).

Phenyl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonate (14)

R = 0.25 (eluent: hexane); yellowish solid; mp 86–88 °C (lit.[34] mp 82 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.76 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.33–7.24 (m, 3H), 6.99 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.4, 141.0, 133.8, 129.9, 129.8, 129.5, 127.4, 122.3; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3096, 3057, 2953, 2853, 1585, 1476, 1381, 1200, 1088, 858, 783, 623; GC/MS (m/z, %): 268 (38.7), 204 (9.3), 175 (100.0), 111 (99.3), 75 (25.7). Undesired product formed in reactions performed to obtain compounds 13a–13e.

1-Phenoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzene (13b)

R = 0.62 (eluent: hexane); yield: 30.5 mg (51%); yellowish oil;[35]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.57 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.42–7.35 (m, 2H), 7.21–7.16 (m, 1H), 7.07–7.03 (m, 4H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.5, 155.8, 130.1, 127.1 (q, J = 3.8 Hz, ArF), 124.9 (q, J = 32.5 Hz, ArF), 124.5, 124.2 (q, J = 269.8 Hz, CF3), 119.9, 117.9; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3055, 2928, 2855, 1618, 1589, 1512, 1491, 1325, 1246, 1167, 1123, 1065, 872, 841, 739; GC/MS (m/z, %): 238 (93.2), 210 (28.0), 169 (22.1), 141 (65.0), 77 (100.0).

1-Nitro-4-phenoxybenzene (13c)

R = 0.39 (eluent: hexane); yield: 37.6 mg (70%); yellowish solid; mp 57–58 °C (lit.[17b] mp 58–59 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.22–8.17 (m, 2H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.03–6.98 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.3, 154.7, 142.6, 130.3, 125.9, 125.4, 120.5, 117.0; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3074, 2922, 2837, 1610, 1582, 1483, 1341, 1246, 1163, 1070, 874, 748, 488; GC/MS (m/z, %): 215 (94.9), 185 (51.4), 141 (31.5), 115 (84.0), 77 (100.0).

1-Methyl-4-phenoxybenzene (13d)

R = 0.62 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 11.0 mg (24%); yellowish oil;[36]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.30 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (dd, J = 8.2 Hz, 0.8 Hz, 2H), 6.91 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 2.33 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 157.8, 154.7, 132.9, 130.2, 129.6, 122.8, 119.1, 118.3, 20.7; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3061, 3030, 2922, 2857, 1589, 1489, 1281, 1238, 1165, 1072, 870, 756, 691; GC/MS (m/z, %): 184 (100.0), 169 (6.1), 141 (17.2), 91 (91.8), 77 (22.6).

1-Methoxy-4-phenoxybenzene (13e)

R = 0.62 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 14.9 mg (30%); yellowish oil;[17b]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.28 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.05–6.85 (m, 7H), 3.78 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.5, 155.9, 150.1, 129.6, 122.4, 120.8, 117.5, 114.8, 55.6; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3061, 2934, 2833, 1589, 1504, 1487, 1219, 1163, 1072, 1035, 872, 756, 691; GC/MS (m/z, %): 200 (100.0), 185 (59.1), 141 (1.6), 129 (37.2), 77 (48.1).

4-Methoxyphenyl 4-Chlorobenzenesulfonate (19c)

R = 0.33 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); brownish solid; mp 88–90 °C (lit.[37] mp 90–91 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.74 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H), 6.78 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.4, 142.8, 140.9, 133.7, 129.9, 129.4, 123.2, 114.6, 55.6; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3109, 3069, 2963, 2914, 2839, 1589, 1503, 1442, 1375, 1254, 1196, 1084, 842, 758, 619; GC/MS (m/z, %): 298 (12.8), 219 (0.1), 191 (0.1), 175 (0.8), 123 (100.0). Undesired product formed in the reaction performed to obtain compound 13e.

1-Chloro-4-phenoxybenzene (13f)

R = 0.67 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 41.0 mg (80%); yellowish oil;[38]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.36–7.24 (m, 4H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (dd, J = 8.2 Hz, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 6.96–6.90 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.9, 156.0, 129.8, 129.7, 128.2, 123.6, 120.0, 118.9; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3065, 3028, 2955, 2924, 2853, 1584, 1483, 1240, 1163, 1088, 868, 754, 691; GC/MS (m/z, %): 204 (100.0), 169 (18.0), 141 (96.5), 115 (27.7), 77 (49.2).

1-Bromo-2-phenoxybenzene (13g)

R = 0.60 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 55.4 mg (89%); brownish solid; mp 42–44 °C (lit.[39] mp 43–44 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.62 (dd, J = 7.9 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.21 (m, 1H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.00–6.93 (m, 4H); 13C{1H } NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.9, 153.7, 133.8, 129.8, 128.6, 125.0, 123.4, 120.6, 118.1, 114.9; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3055, 3012, 2955, 2924, 2853, 1599, 1491, 1464, 1234, 1165, 1045, 866, 748, 658; GC/MS (m/z, %): 250 (31.1), 248 (30.5), 169 (100.0), 141 (60.6), 77 (24.7).

1,2-Dimethyl-4-phenoxybenzene (13h)

R = 0.67 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 30.7 mg (62%); yellowish solid; mp 33–35 °C (lit.[40] mp 35–37 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.30 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.09–7.03 (m, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (dd, J = 8.1 Hz, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 2.23 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 157.9, 154.8, 138.2, 131.6, 130.6, 129.6, 122.7, 120.5, 118.3, 116.4, 19.9, 19.0; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3061, 3038, 2922, 2857, 1591, 1487, 1251, 1163, 1072, 949, 758, 691; GC/MS (m/z, %): 198 (100.0), 183 (28.1), 155 (25.5), 105 (91.8), 77 (43.1).

1,2-Dimethyl-4-(4-nitrophenoxy)benzene (13i)

R = 0.64 (eluent: hexane); yield: 30.7 mg (76%); yellowish solid; mp 86–87 °C (lit.[41] mp 87–87.5 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.20–8.16 (m, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.99–6.96 (m, 2H), 6.87 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (dd, J = 8.1 Hz, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 2.28 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.9, 152.4, 142.3, 138.9, 133.8, 131.1, 125.9, 121.7, 117.8, 116.7, 19.9, 19.1; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3107, 3071, 2972, 2922, 2855, 1609, 1591, 1483, 1344, 1254, 1109, 844, 687; GC/MS (m/z, %): 243 (100.0), 228 (17.6), 153 (15.8), 105 (70.1), 77 (27.6).

4-(4-Methoxyphenoxy)-1,2-dimethylbenzene (13j)

R = 0.63 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 14.8 mg (26%); yellowish oil;[17b]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.04 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.96–6.92 (m, 2H), 6.88–6.84 (m, 2H), 6.76 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H); 6.68 (dd, J = 8.2 Hz, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.3, 155.5, 150.8, 138.0, 130.7, 130.5, 120.3, 119.2, 115.1, 114.7, 55.6, 19.9, 18.9; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3044, 2997, 2924, 2855, 1616, 1581, 1495, 1240, 1211, 1037, 831, 766; GC/MS (m/z, %): 228 (100.0), 213 (31.0), 157 (22.1), 105 (18.2), 77 (18.5).

1-Methoxy-3-phenoxybenzene (13l)

R = 0.67 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 25.4 mg (51%); colorless oil;[36]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.33 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (td, J = 8.9 Hz, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J = 8.1 Hz, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 6.65 (dd, J = 9.2 Hz, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.59–6.57 (m, 2H), 3.77 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.9, 158.5, 157.0, 130.1, 129.7, 123.4, 119.1, 110.9, 108.8, 104.8, 55.3; IR (ATR, cm–1): ν 3067, 3003, 2957, 2928, 2853, 1585, 1487, 1217, 1138, 1041, 951, 760, 689; GC/MS (m/z, %): 200 (100.0), 157 (69.3), 141 (15.7), 129 (30.1), 77 (29.8).

1-Bromo-2-(3-methoxyphenoxy)benzene (13m)

R = 0.32 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 64.1 mg (92%); colorless oil;[42]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.29–7.19 (m, 2H), 7.04–6.98 (m, 2H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.54–6.51 (m, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.0, 158.1, 153.4, 133.8, 130.2, 128.7, 125.1, 120.9, 115.0, 110.1, 109.0, 104.2, 55.4; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3065, 3001, 2957, 2938, 2833, 1607, 1578, 1487, 1450, 1263, 1140, 1045, 953, 758, 685; GC/MS (m/z, %): 280 (30.7), 278 (30.5), 199 (100.0), 184 (83.1), 77 (17.7).

1,2-Dimethoxy-4-phenoxybenzene (13n)

R = 0.32 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 31.5 mg (55%); yellowish solid; mp 48–50 °C (lit.[43] mp 50 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.30 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 6.56 (dd, J = 8.7 Hz, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.2, 150.4, 149.9, 145.4, 129.6, 122.5, 117.6, 111.7, 110.8, 104.5, 56.3, 55.9; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3067, 2999, 2953, 2933, 2833, 1591, 1489, 1219, 1128, 1028, 957, 854, 760, 692; GC/MS (m/z, %): 230 (100.0), 215 (79.4), 187 (24.0), 115 (26.7), 77 (44.2).

4-(2-Bromophenoxy)-1,2-dimethoxybenzene (13o)

R = 0.39 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 60.2 mg (78%); yellowish oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.61 (dd, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (td, J = 7.8 Hz, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (td, J = 7.7 Hz, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (dd, J = 8.2 Hz, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (dd, J = 8.7 Hz, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.6, 150.1, 149.9, 145.6, 133.6, 128.5, 124.1, 118.8, 113.6, 111.6, 110.0, 104.0, 56.2, 55.9; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3063, 2999, 2955, 2833, 1600, 1580, 1510, 1470, 1440, 1260, 1229, 1150, 1045, 1028, 959, 854, 754; GC/MS (m/z, %): 310 (98.5), 308 (100.0), 229 (27.7), 186 (50.2), 171 (59.6); HRMS (ESI): calcd for [C14H14BrO3]+, 309.0121, 311.0101; found, 309.0122, 311.0100.

Diphenylamine (13p)

R = 0.52 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (15:1)); yield: 11.4 mg (27%); greenish solid; mp 49–51 °C (lit.[17a] mp 40–50 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.26 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H), 6.92 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 5.69 (s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.1, 129.3, 121.0, 117.8; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3383, 3034, 2922, 1595, 1493, 1319, 1172, 1084, 876, 745, 689, 505; GC/MS (m/z, %): 169 (100.0), 139 (3.3), 115 (3.4), 83 (17.6), 51 (7.6).

Phenyl Benzoate (13q)

R = 0.50 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 13.8 mg (28%); off-white solid; mp 68–69 °C (lit.[17c] mp 69–70 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.21 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.29–7.20 (m, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 165.1, 151.0, 133.5, 130.1, 129.6, 129.5, 128.5, 125.8, 121.7; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3088, 3057, 3017, 2922, 2855, 1728, 1589, 1485, 1261, 1198, 1063, 752, 692, 503; GC/MS (m/z, %): 198 (7.1), 168 (0.1), 105 (100.0), 77 (42.3), 51 (11.8).

Procedure for the Preparation of Alkyl Azides (25a–25c)[23]

To a flask were added sodium azide (3.3 mmol, 215 mg) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (6.6 mL). The mixture was maintained under anhydrous conditions and magnetic stirring at room temperature for 24 h. Then, the appropriate alkyl bromide 24 (3 mmol) was added slowly. The resulting mixture was maintained under anhydrous conditions and stirring at room temperature for the indicated time. Then, ice-cold distilled water (15 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 9 mL). The organic phase was washed with distilled water (2 × 15 mL) and brine (15 mL) and dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford the azides 25a–25c, which were employed in the next step without further purification.

(Azidomethyl)benzene (25a)

Reaction time: 1 h; R = 0.61 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 359 mg (90%); colorless liquid;[23]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.39–7.27 (m, 5H), 4.29 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 135.3, 128.7, 128.2, 128.1, 54.7; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3088, 3032, 2930, 2876, 2097, 1497, 1454, 1256, 876, 698; GC/MS (m/z, %): 133 (23.1), 104 (87.6), 91 (100.0), 77 (77.8), 51 (40.5).

5-(Azidomethyl)benzo[d][1,3]dioxole (25b)

Reaction time: 1 h; R = 0.46 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 504 mg (95%); yellowish liquid;[44]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.80–6.74 (m, 3H), 5.95 (s, 2H), 4.21 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 148.0, 147.6, 129.0, 121.9, 108.7, 108.3, 101.2, 54.6; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3073, 2992, 2968, 2897, 2097, 1608, 1504, 1489, 1445, 1250, 1099, 1040, 930, 810, 689, 505; GC/MS (m/z, %): 177 (28.7), 148 (88.7), 135 (100.0), 121 (29.6), 77 (22.3).

1-Azidodecane (25c)

Reaction time: 4 h; R = 0.71 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 527 mg (96%); colorless liquid;[45]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.25 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.59 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 1.38–1.27 (m, 14H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 51.4, 31.8, 29.5, 29.5, 29.3, 29.1, 28.8, 26.7, 22.6, 14.0; IR (ATR, cm–1): 2953, 2926, 2855, 2095, 1464, 1348, 1261, 895, 721, 654; GC/MS (m/z, %): 155 (0.9), 140 (0.2), 70 (49.0), 56 (52.4), 43 (100.0).

1-Azidobutane (25d)[24]

To a flask were added 1-chlorobutane (20 mmol, 1.85 g, 2.1 mL), sodium azide (40 mmol, 2.6 g), and DMSO (40 mL). The resulting mixture was maintained under anhydrous conditions and magnetic stirring at room temperature for 14 h. Then, ice-cold distilled water (40 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 50 mL). The organic phase was washed with a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution (5 × 30 mL) and dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, affording the azide 25d, which was employed in the next step without further purification. R = 0.31 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 792 mg (40%); yellowish liquid;[24]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.26 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.59 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.41 (s, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.94 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 51.1, 30.8, 19.8, 13.4; IR (ATR, cm–1): ν 2955, 2922, 2853, 2091, 1595, 1450, 1431, 1261, 802; GC/MS (m/z, %): 99 (0.3), 70 (10.1), 56 (18.7), 43 (83.6), 43 (100.0).

Procedure for the Preparation of Aryl Azides (26a–26d)[25]

To a flask were added the appropriate aniline 20 (3 mmol) and hydrochloric acid (3 mL of a 6 M aqueous solution), and the mixture was cooled to 0 °C. Then, a solution of sodium nitrite (9 mmol, 310 mg) in distilled water (7.5 mL) was added slowly. The reaction mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring at room temperature for 30 min. Then, a solution of sodium azide (12 mmol, 780 mg) in distilled water (15 mL) was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was maintained under stirring at room temperature for 2 h. Afterward, the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 30 mL), and the organic phase was washed with brine (90 mL) and dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure to afford the azides 26a–26d, which were employed in the next step without further purification.

Azidobenzene (26a)

R = 0.67 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (3:1)); yield: 357 mg (quantitative); brownish liquid;[25]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.31 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 139.9, 129.7, 124.8, 118.9; IR (ATR, cm–1): 2957, 2922, 2851, 2112, 1618, 1501, 1261, 1103, 1020, 810, 751, 629.

1-Azido-4-nitrobenzene (26b)

R = 0.50 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 472 mg (96%); orange solid; mp 70–71 °C (lit.[46] mp 69–70 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.27–8.22 (m, 2H), 7.17–7.12 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.9, 144.6, 125.6, 119.4; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3103, 3067, 2994, 2922, 2127, 1605, 1516, 1491, 1350, 1288, 1107, 847, 746, 681.

1-Azido-3-bromobenzene (26c)

R = 0.58 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 564 mg (95%); brownish liquid;[47]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.26–7.14 (m, 3H), 6.93 (ddd, J = 7.8 Hz, 1.9 Hz, 1.1 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 141.5, 130.8, 127.9, 123.2, 122.1, 117.6; IR (ATR, cm–1): ν 3061, 2925, 2853, 2102, 1587, 1470, 1283, 1067, 854, 771, 673.

1-Azido-2-methylbenzene (26d)

R = 0.81 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 379 mg (95%); brownish liquid;[48]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.18 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.18 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 138.3, 131.0, 129.5, 127.0, 124.5, 117.8, 17.1; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3061, 2926, 2855, 2018, 1612, 1503, 1462, 1275, 1069, 746, 581.

Procedure for the [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reaction with Arynes[8,22]

To a vial (10 mL) were added the appropriate azides 25 and 26 (0.25 mmol), the appropriate 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates 7a–7e (0.375 mmol), 18-crown-6-ether (0.25 mmol, 66.0 mg), anhydrous benzonitrile (4.0 mL), and cesium fluoride (0.75 mmol, 114 mg). The vial was capped, and the mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 24 h. Afterward, a saturated sodium chloride solution (20 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 20 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the ethyl ether was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the benzonitrile was removed by horizontal distillation under vacuum. The residue obtained was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography with silica gel using an appropriate eluent, affording the benzotriazoles 27a–27l.

1-Benzyl-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27a)

R = 0.16 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 31.3 mg (60%); brownish solid; mp 114–116 °C (lit.[49] mp 113–115 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.07 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.26 (m, 8H), 5.84 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.3, 134.7, 132.8, 129.0, 128.4, 127.5, 127.4, 123.9, 120.0, 109.7, 52.2; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3086, 3028, 2976, 2945, 2868, 1601, 1587, 1456, 1224, 1070, 947, 746, 623; GC/MS (m/z, %): 209 (51.8), 180 (100.0), 152 (10.2), 91 (70.2), 65 (17.4).

1-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl-methyl)-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27b)

R = 0.43 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 36.6 mg (58%); off-white solid; mp 134–136 °C (lit.[50] mp 128–130 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.32 (m, 3H), 6.84–6.74 (m, 3H), 5.93 (s, 2H), 5.74 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 148.3, 147.8, 146.3, 132.7, 128.4, 127.4, 124.0, 121.3, 120.1, 109.7, 108.5, 108.1, 101.3, 52.2; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3061, 2978, 2914, 1614, 1489, 1449, 1250, 1088, 758, 740; GC/MS (m/z, %): 253 (100.0), 224 (47.0), 167 (45.8), 135 (85.4), 77 (60.8).

1-Decyl-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27c)

R = 0.71 (eluent: dichloromethane); yield: 38.8 mg (60%); yellowish oil;[8]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.06 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.01 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.34–1.24 (m, 14H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.0, 132.9, 127.1, 123.7, 120.0, 109.3, 48.2, 31.8, 29.7, 29.4, 29.3, 29.2, 29.0, 26.7, 22.6, 14.1; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3065, 2924, 2853, 1616, 1495, 1454, 1159, 745; GC/MS (m/z, %): 259 (38.0), 146 (50.7), 132 (83.0), 106 (100.0), 91 (68.3).

1-Butyl-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27d)

R = 0.29 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 27.5 mg (63%); yellowish oil;[51]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.06 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.55–7.45 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.36 (m, 1H), 4.65 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.00 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.38 (s, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 0.96 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.0, 132.9, 127.1, 123.7, 120.0, 109.3, 47.9, 31.7, 19.9, 13.5; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3065, 2959, 2874, 1614, 1495, 1454, 1225, 1051, 746; GC/MS (m/z, %): 175 (14.2), 133 (20.4), 118 (11.5), 91 (100.0), 77 (41.3).

1-Benzyl-5,6-dimethyl-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27e)

R = 0.18 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 30.8 mg (52%); brownish solid; mp 161–163 °C (lit.[22] mp 158–161 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.79 (s, 1H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 3H), 7.26–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 5.78 (s, 2H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.34 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.5, 137.7, 135.1, 133.7, 131.9, 128.9, 128.3, 127.4, 119.1, 109.0, 52.0, 20.9, 20.4; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3086, 3028, 2976, 2949, 2924, 2853, 1628, 1449, 1217, 1101, 837, 704; GC/MS (m/z, %): 237 (18.6), 208 (23.7), 194 (16.0), 91 (100.0), 65 (16.5).

1-Benzyl-5,6-difluoro-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27f)

R = 0.15 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 15.3 mg (25%); off-white solid; mp 127–128 °C (lit.[22] mp 119–122 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.80 (dd, J = 9.2 Hz, 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.40–7.34 (m, 3H), 7.28–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.09 (dd, J = 8.6 Hz, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.80 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.4 (dd, J = 251.6 Hz, 16.9 Hz, ArF), 149.0 (dd, J = 246.8 Hz, 16.5 Hz, ArF), 141.4 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, ArF), 133.9, 129.2, 128.8, 128.5 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, ArF), 127.6, 106.4 (dd, J = 19.9 Hz, 1.9 Hz, ArF), 97.1 (d, J = 22.5 Hz, ArF), 52.6; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3086, 3055, 2972, 2947, 2866, 1599, 1499, 1479, 1233, 1139, 837, 702, 633; GC/MS (m/z, %): 245 (54.8), 216 (100.0), 188 (11.4), 91 (69.8), 77 (10.9).

1-Benzyl-4-methoxy-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27g)

R = 0.11 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 31.7 mg (53%); brownish solid; mp 90–92 °C (lit.[22] mp 92–94 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.32–7.24 (m, 6H), 6.90 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 5.81 (s, 2H), 4.10 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.8, 138.3, 134.8, 128.9, 128.6, 128.4, 127.5, 103.3, 101.8, 56.2, 52.2; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3086, 2961, 2916, 2851, 1638, 1514, 1454, 1396, 1248, 1069, 725, 637; GC/MS (m/z, %): 239 (48.1), 210 (32.4), 180 (20.9), 167 (12.7), 91 (100.0). The position of the methoxy group was attributed by the NOESY 2D NMR experiment. The methylene hydrogens show two cross-peaks with two aromatic hydrogens, which can only be explained when the methoxy group is placed in position 4.

1-Benzyl-4,5-dimethoxy-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27h)

R = 0.21 (eluent: dichloromethane/hexane (2:1)); yield: 37.7 mg (56%); brownish oil; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.34–7.25 (m, 5H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 5.78 (s, 2H), 4.58 (s, 3H), 3.90 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.7, 140.1, 139.8, 134.7, 130.7, 129.0, 128.4, 127.5, 117.9, 101.1, 61.4, 58.6, 52.1; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3088, 2992, 2936, 2835, 1591, 1512, 1452, 1244, 1098, 714; GC/MS (m/z, %): 269 (41.0), 240 (7.1), 226 (12.8), 91 (100.0), 65 (26.8); HRMS (ESI) calcd for [C15H16N3O2]+, 270.1237, 271.1271; found, 270,1247, 271.1258.

1-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27i)

R = 0.19 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 24.5 mg (50%); brownish solid; mp 85–87 °C (lit.[22] mp 86–87 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.15 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.79–7.73 (m, 3H), 7.63–7.40 (m, 5H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.4, 136.9, 132.2, 129.8, 128.6, 128.2, 124.3, 122.8, 120.2, 110.3; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3096, 3055, 2918, 2851, 1616, 1501, 1458, 1275, 1059, 748, 707; GC/MS (m/z, %): 195 (27.9), 167 (100.0), 139 (19.6), 77 (51.5), 51 (31.8).

1-(4-Nitrophenyl-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27j)

R = 0.14 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 42.6 mg (71%); brownish solid; mp 242–243 °C (lit.[52] mp 243–244 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.53 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 8.27 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 3H), 8.12 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 147.0, 146.6, 141.7, 131.9, 130.0, 126.1, 125.8, 123.4, 120.6, 111.8; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3100, 2957, 2920, 2851, 1593, 1518, 1346, 1109, 851, 748; GC/MS (m/z, %): 240 (22.2), 212 (10.0), 166 (100.0), 140 (42.4), 77 (5.9).

1-(3-Bromophenyl)-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27k)

R = 0.32 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 54.6 mg (80%); yellowish solid;[53] mp 106–108 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.17 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (s, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.66–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.53–7.44 (m, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.6, 138.1, 132.0, 131.6, 131.1, 128.7, 125.8, 124.7, 123.4, 121.2, 120.5, 110.1; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3072, 2957, 2922, 2851, 1589, 1479, 1283, 1063, 791, 683; GC/MS (m/z, %): 275 (10.6), 273 (10.9), 166 (100.0), 139 (18.9), 77 (2.6).

1-o-Tolyl-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (27l)

R = 0.36 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 16.2 mg (31%); yellowish solid; mp 65–66 °C (lit.[10] mp 60–63 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.16 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.40 (m, 6H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 2.14 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 145.6, 135.3, 135.2, 133.9, 131.7, 130.0, 128.0, 127.0, 126.9, 124.1, 120.1, 110.1, 17.8; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3059, 2957, 2924, 2853, 1614, 1503, 1273, 1182, 1069, 785, 746; GC/MS (m/z, %): 209 (14.5), 180 (100.0), 152 (8.7), 91 (14.1), 65 (23.3).

Procedure for the [4 + 2] Cycloaddition Reaction with Arynes[8,10]

To a vial (10 mL) were added the appropriate 2-(trimethylsilyl)aryl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonates 7a–7e (0.375 mmol), 18-crown-6-ether (0.25 mmol, 66.0 mg), anhydrous benzonitrile (4 mL), cesium fluoride (0.75 mmol, 114 mg), and the appropriate furan 28 (0.25 mmol). The vial was capped, and the mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 24 h. Afterward, a saturated sodium chloride solution (20 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 20 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the ethyl ether was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the benzonitrile was removed by horizontal distillation under vacuum. The residue obtained was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography with silica gel using an appropriate eluent to afford the cycloadducts 29a–29g.

1,4-Dihydro-1,4-epoxynaphthalene (29a)

R = 0.39 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 24.8 mg (69%); yellowish solid; mp 52–54 °C (lit.[54] mp 54.5–55.5 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.25–7.24 (m, 2H), 7.03 (s, 2H), 6.97 (dd, J = 5.1 Hz, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 5.71 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.0, 143.0, 125.0, 120.3, 82.3; IR (KBr, cm–1): 2955, 2924, 2853, 1638, 1616, 1454, 1381, 1279, 1175, 847, 758, 623; GC/MS (m/z, %): 144 (11.2), 128 (50.5), 115 (100.0), 102 (7.4), 89 (25.0).

1,4-Dihydro-1,4-dimethyl-1,4-epoxynaphthalene (29b)

R = 0.46 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 33.1 mg (77%); colorless oil;[55]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.13 (dd, J = 5.1 Hz, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 6.97 (dd, J = 5.1 Hz, 3.0 Hz, 2H), 6.77 (s, 2H), 1.89 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.7, 146.8, 124.7, 118.3, 88.6, 15.2; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3071, 2974, 2930, 2866, 1638, 1618, 1452, 1383, 1306, 1142, 860, 760, 692, 648; GC/MS (m/z, %): 172 (9.0), 146 (28.8), 129 (47.5), 77 (15.7), 43 (100.0).

1-(1,4-Epoxynaphthalen-1(4H)-yl)ethanone (29c)

R = 0.44 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 32.5 mg (70%); yellowish oil;[56]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.26 (td, J = 6.4 Hz, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 7.07–6.96 (m, 4H), 5.80 ( s, 1H), 2.40 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 205.2, 148.0, 147.5, 143.4, 142.2, 125.6, 125.2, 120.6, 119.6, 95.7, 82.3, 26.8; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3071, 2974, 3012, 2924, 2853, 1713, 1587, 1456, 1362, 1306, 1150, 874, 758, 677, 554; GC/MS (m/z, %): 186 (5.8), 160 (7.5), 115 (61.8), 89 (17.6), 43 (100.0).

1,4-Dihydro-6,7-dimethyl-1,4-epoxynaphthalene (29d)

R = 0.48 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 27.0 mg (63%); yellowish oil;[57]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.05 (s, 2H), 7.00 (s, 2H), 5.66 (s, 2H), 2.19 (s, 6H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.6, 143.1, 132.5, 122.1, 82.2, 19.8; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3071, 2974, 2930, 2866, 1638, 1618, 1452, 1383, 1305, 1142, 860, 760, 692, 648; GC/MS (m/z, %): 172 (21.6), 156 (15.6), 144 (45.5), 129 (100.0), 51 (13.8).

6,7-Difluoro-1,4-dihydro-1,4-epoxynaphthalene (29e)

R = 0.28 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 5.0 mg (11%);colorless oil;[57]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.09–7.02 (m, 4H), 5.68 (s, 2H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.2 (dd, J = 246.4 Hz, 14.6 Hz, ArF), 145.1 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, ArF), 143.0, 111.0–110.4 (m, ArF), 82.0; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3094, 3019, 2926, 2855, 1626, 1618, 1366, 1254, 1040, 852, 789, 696; GC/MS (m/z, %): 180 (15.6), 151 (100.0), 125 (16.5), 101 (8.4), 75 (11.7).

1,4-Dihydro-5-methoxy-1,4-epoxynaphthalene (29f)

R = 0.36 (eluent: hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1)); yield: 32.6 mg (75%); brownish oil;[58]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.07 (dd, J = 5.5 Hz, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (dd, J = 5.5 Hz, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.96–6.91 (m, 2H), 6.59 (dd, J = 7.7 Hz, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (s, 1H), 5.70 (s, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.9, 151.5, 143.0, 142.9, 135.0, 126.9, 113.7, 110.3, 82.5, 80.0, 55.7; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3067, 2959, 2936, 2836, 1616, 1597, 1479, 1263, 1092, 999, 856, 721, 623; GC/MS (m/z, %): 174 (7.2), 146 (65.7), 115 (100.0), 103 (64.5), 77 (38.3).

1,4-Dihydro-5,6-dimethoxy-1,4-epoxynaphthalene (29g)

R = 0.18 (eluent: dichloromethane/hexane (1:1)); yield: 35.0 mg (69%); brownish solid; mp 88–90 °C (lit.[59] mp 92–93 °C); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.00 (s, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.43 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (s, 1H), 5.64 (s, 1H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 3.81 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.7, 143.8, 143.0, 141.8, 141.4, 136.5, 114.4, 107.2, 81.9, 81.2, 60.4, 56.2; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3015, 2999, 2932, 2843, 1638, 1616, 1489, 1350, 1244, 1059, 868, 718, 588; GC/MS (m/z, %): 204 (60.9), 176 (80.0), 161 (100.0), 115 (80.5), 89 (57.8).

1-(6a,7-Diidro-4H-dibenzo[de,g]quinolina-6(5H)-il)etanona (32)[26]

To a vial were added the enamide 31 (0.25 mmol, 46.8 mg), 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl 4-chlorobenzenesulfonate (7a) (0.375 mmol, 128 mg), 18-crown-6 ether (0.25 mmol, 66.0 mg), anhydrous benzonitrile (4.0 mL), and cesium fluoride (0.75 mmol, 114 mg). The vial was capped, and the mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring at 80 °C for 24 h. Afterward, a saturated sodium chloride solution (20 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl ether (3 × 20 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the ethyl ether was evaporated under reduced pressure, and the benzonitrile was removed by horizontal distillation under vacuum. The residue was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography with silica gel using ethyl acetate as an eluent to give the product of interest 32. R = 0.48 (eluent: ethyl acetate); yield: 30.8 mg (47%); brownish solid; mp 210–212 °C (lit.[26] mp 210–212 °C); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, mixture of rotamers): δ 7.81 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 0.5H), 7.77 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (t, J = 4.2 Hz, 1.5H), 7.33–7.24 (m, 6H), 7.14 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 0.5H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (dd, J = 14.1 Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dd, J = 13.1 Hz, 4.8 Hz, 0.5H), 4.77 (dd, J = 14.4 Hz, 3.7 Hz, 0.5H), 4.03 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 3.33 (t, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (dd, J = 14.0 Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.13 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 0.5H), 2.92–2.74 (m, 5H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 1.5H); 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3, mixture of rotamers): δ 169.8, 169.2, 135.4, 135.2, 134.8, 134.6, 134.2, 134.0, 133.8, 133.6, 132.6, 131.8, 129.0, 128.5, 128.1, 128.0, 128.0, 127.8, 127.4, 127.3, 126.8, 123.9, 123.6, 122.5, 122.5, 53.6, 50.4, 42.1, 36.6, 35.5, 32.9, 30.7, 29.8, 29.6, 22.6, 21.5; IR (KBr, cm–1): 3011, 2924, 2897, 1634, 1612, 1435, 1273, 1261, 1173, 1036, 768, 648; GC/MS (m/z, %): 263 (61.5), 248 (0.7), 235 (1.3), 204 (26.3), 192 (100.0).

(±)-Noraporphine (33)[26]

To a vessel at room temperature were added compound 32 (0.19 mmol, 51.2 mg), ethanol/water (2:1) (3.0 mL), and lithium hydroxide (1.9 mmol, 46.6 mg). The mixture was heated under microwave with a closed system at 180 °C (50 W) for 40 min. Afterward, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Then, water (10 mL) was added, and the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 15 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography with silica gel using methanol as an eluent to give the desired product 33. R = 0.28 (eluent: methanol); yield: 20.7 mg (48%); yellowish oil;[26]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.66 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.22 (m, 2H), 7.18–7.16 (m, 2H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (dd, J = 13.8 Hz, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 3.35 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 3.00 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 2.90–2.68 (m, 4H), 2.57 (s, 1H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 134.9, 134.3, 134.2, 133.5, 133.2, 128.4, 128.3, 127.6, 127.4, 127.1, 123.9, 121.8, 53.3, 43.0, 36.3, 28.8; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3393, 3331, 3065, 3022, 2922, 2851, 1570, 1462, 1194, 1120, 1069, 756, 470; GC/MS (m/z, %): 220 (100.0), 204 (13.6), 192 (20.7), 178 (7.7), 165 (10.7).

(±)-Aporphine (34)[26]

To a vial were added compound 33 (0.094 mmol, 20.7 mg), methanol (3 mL), and 37% (w/v) aqueous solution of formaldehyde (12 mmol, 1.0 mL). The vial was capped, and the mixture was maintained under magnetic stirring at room temperature for 30 min. Thereafter, sodium borohydride (106 mg, 2.8 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture, which was maintained under stirring at room temperature for 1 h. Afterward, a saturated aqueous solution of sodium chloride (20 mL) was added to the mixture, which was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After filtration, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography with silica gel using methanol as an eluent to give (±)-aporphine (34). R = 0.62 (eluent: methanol); yield: 17.1 mg (78%); yellowish oil;[26]1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.65 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.17 (m, 4H), 7.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.29–3.05 (m, 4H), 2.74–2.65 ( m, 2H), 2.59–2.50 (m, 4H), 2.54 (s, 3H); 13C{1H} NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 135.0, 134.2, 133.5, 133.2, 133.1, 128.4, 128.0, 127.6, 127.4, 127.1, 123.8, 122.0, 61.9, 53.2, 33.8, 29.7, 28.6; IR (ATR, cm–1): 3055, 2954, 2921, 2851, 1590, 1465, 1284, 1128, 757, 746, 602; GC/MS (m/z, %): 234 (100.0), 219 (19.4), 204 (8.8), 192 (35.7), 178 (5.2).
  52 in total

1.  Aryne multifunctionalization with benzdiyne and benztriyne equivalents.

Authors:  Jiarong Shi; Yuanyuan Li; Yang Li
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Silylaryl Halides Can Replace Triflates as Aryne Precursors.

Authors:  Milad Mesgar; Olafs Daugulis
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 6.005

Review 3.  Iodonium Salts as Benzyne Precursors.

Authors:  Akira Yoshimura; Akio Saito; Viktor V Zhdankin
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Aryne Compatible Solvents are not Always Innocent.

Authors:  Sung-Eun Suh; David M Chenoweth
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  Continuous-flow synthesis of trimethylsilylphenyl perfluorosulfonate benzyne precursors.

Authors:  Boris Michel; Michael F Greaney
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 6.005

6.  Recent advances in molecular rearrangements involving aryne intermediates.

Authors:  Tony Roy; Akkattu T Biju
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Synthesis of Nanographenes, Starphenes, and Sterically Congested Polyarenes by Aryne Cyclotrimerization.

Authors:  Iago Pozo; Enrique Guitián; Dolores Pérez; Diego Peña
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 22.384

8.  Total synthesis of (-)-tubingensin B enabled by the strategic use of an aryne cyclization.

Authors:  Michael A Corsello; Junyong Kim; Neil K Garg
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 24.427

9.  Benzyne click chemistry: synthesis of benzotriazoles from benzynes and azides.

Authors:  Feng Shi; Jesse P Waldo; Yu Chen; Richard C Larock
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 6.005

10.  General, mild, and intermolecular Ullmann-type synthesis of diaryl and alkyl aryl ethers catalyzed by diol-copper(I) complex.

Authors:  Ajay B Naidu; E A Jaseer; Govindasamy Sekar
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.