Literature DB >> 32063338

International microsurgery simulation society (IMSS) consensus statement on the minimum standards for a basic microsurgery course, requirements for a microsurgical anastomosis global rating scale and minimum thresholds for training.

Ali Ghanem1, Marie Kearns2, Alberto Ballestín3, Stefan Froschauer4, Yelena Akelina5, Sandra Shurey6, Josette Legagneux7, Savitha Ramachandran8, Santolo Cozzolino9, Venkat Ramakrishnan10, Georgios Pafitanis11, Yehya Zakaria12, Kalid Al-Maaytah13, Seiji Komatsu14, Yoshihori Kimata15, Ignacio Cifuentes16, Panayotis N Soucacos17, Pierluigi Tos18, Simon Myers19.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Microsurgery is a surgical technique that uses optical magnification as well as specific instruments to address necessary reconstructive procedures in different medical specialties. The apprenticeship of this technique requires overcoming a steep learning curve. There is a need for standardization of the training criteria in microsurgery. The International Microsurgery Simulation Society (IMSS) was born in 2011, since then its main objective has been to connect the main international specialists and educators of this sub-specialty to share and discuss the ethical and scientific basis of preclinical microsurgery teaching.
METHODS: In order to achieve a consensus on the minimum standards for the organization of basic microsurgery training courses, the requirements for a microsurgical anastomosis global rating scale and minimum thresholds for training, a total of nineteen independent global experts participated in a formal consultative consensus development program. The agreement criteria for each statement was established when consensus of 65-100% was reached.
RESULTS: There have been established six recommendations concerning minimum standards for a basic microsurgery course, one recommendation in relation to minimum thresholds for training and four recommendations regarding the global rating scale as gold standard for a microsurgical anastomosis assessment. The eleven defined recommendations reached the agreement threshold of 65-100%.
CONCLUSIONS: The development of this consensus sets the minimum recommended requirements for conducting basic microsurgery training courses, as well as suggestions for objective assessment of the learning curve and skills of trainees.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Assessment; Global rating scale; Learning; Microsurgery; Simulation; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32063338     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  4 in total

1.  Microsurgical Anastomosis Rating Scale (MARS10): A Final Product Scoring System for Initial Microsurgical Training.

Authors:  Piotr Stogowski; Filip Fliciński; Jan Białek; Filip Dąbrowski; Maciej Piotrowski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  Letter to the editor: "Microsurgical suturing assessment scores: a systematic review".

Authors:  Piotr Stogowski; Karolina Anuszkiewicz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Microsurgery training during COVID-19 pandemic: Practical recommendations from the International Society for Experimental Microsurgery and International Microsurgery Simulation Society.

Authors:  Mihai Oltean; Alexandru Nistor; Mats Hellström; Michael Axelsson; Shintaro Yagi; Eiji Kobayashi; Alberto Ballestin; Yelena Akelina; Norbert Nemeth
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  Structured evaluation of a comprehensive microsurgical training program.

Authors:  Tiago Guedes da Motta Mattar; Gustavo Bispo Dos Santos; João Paulo Mota Telles; Marcelo Rosa de Rezende; Teng Hsiang Wei; Rames Mattar Júnior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.365

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.