Literature DB >> 32063319

Waste paper recycling decision system based on material flow analysis and life cycle assessment: A case study of waste paper recycling from China.

Manzhi Liu1, Shuai Tan2, Mengya Zhang3, Gang He4, Zhizhi Chen5, Zhiwei Fu6, Changjin Luan7.   

Abstract

China's paper industry development is rapid, but the recycling rate of China's waste paper has been low all the time. Meanwhile, material flow analysis can help determine the flow of waste paper, and life cycle assessment (LCA) is the methodological framework for quantifying greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, present study integrates these two methods into the model construction of China's waste paper recycling decision system. Present study constructs a benchmark model of China's waste paper recycling decision system in 2017, focusing on the impact of nonstandard waste paper recycling on the economic and environmental benefits of China's domestic waste paper recycling system. This model construction is followed by sensitivity analysis of the relevant parameters affecting the efficiency of the waste paper recycling system. Finally, present study forecasts the system's economic benefits and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the context of integrating and regulating nonstandard recycling vendors. The results show that the economic benefit of China's waste paper recycling in 2017 is approximately 458.3 yuan/t and that the GHG emissions are 901.1 kgCO2eq. The standard recovery rate and nonstandard recovery acceptance rate will both have a significant impact on the system's economic benefits and improve the GHG emissions structure. In the context of integrating nonstandard recycling enterprises and individual recycling vendors, the economic benefits will rise to 3312.5 yuan/t in 2030, while GHG emissions will rise to 942.9 kgCO2eq. Present study can play a certain guiding role for policy makers in formulating waste paper recycling industry specifications and formulating relevant policies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Life cycle assessment; Material flow; Scenario prediction; Sensitivity analysis; Waste paper recycling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 32063319     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

1.  Non-Linear Regression Modelling to Estimate the Global Warming Potential of a Newspaper.

Authors:  Alexis Lozano; Pedro Cabrera; Ana M Blanco-Marigorta
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.524

2.  Feasibility of substituting old corrugated carton pulp with thermal alkali and enzyme pretreated semichemical mechanical rice straw pulp.

Authors:  Yu-Hsun Lai; Hao-Chen Sun; Ming-Hui Chang; Ching-Chin Li; Jiann-Gwo Shyu; Yuan-Shing Perng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Estimation of the healthcare waste generation during COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Tamal Chowdhury; Hemal Chowdhury; Md Salman Rahman; Nazia Hossain; Ashfaq Ahmed; Sadiq M Sait
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 4.  Approaches for prevention and environmental management of novel COVID-19.

Authors:  Mohammad Tabish; Aisha Khatoon; Saad Alkahtani; Abdullah Alkahtane; Jawahir Alghamdi; Syed Anees Ahmed; Snober S Mir; Gadah Albasher; Rafa Almeer; Nouf K Al-Sultan; Nada H Aljarba; Wedad Saeed Al-Qahtani; Mohammed Al-Zharani; Amit Kumar Nayak; Md Saquib Hasnain
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 5.190

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.