Literature DB >> 32062086

A multi-faceted approach to understanding individual differences in mind-wandering.

Matthew K Robison1, Ashley L Miller2, Nash Unsworth2.   

Abstract

The present study examined a multi-faceted approach to individual differences in mind-wandering. Further, the influence of task demands as a moderator of inter-individual relationships and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind-wandering was also examined. A large sample (N = 332) of participants completed a battery of tasks during which mind-wandering was measured with periodic thought probes. One set of tasks placed relatively high demands on attention, whereas another set of tasks placed relatively low demands on attention. We also measured individual differences in working memory capacity and attention control, along with measures of state variables like motivation, alertness, and mood. Finally, participants completed a series of questionnaires to measure various personality traits. Overall, the results reinforced the importance of taking a multi-faceted approach to mind-wandering - one that address individual differences at the cognitive, contextual, and dispositional levels, as well as the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind-wandering.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention control; Mind-wandering; Motivation; Personality; Working memory capacity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32062086     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  8 in total

1.  A "Goldilocks zone" for mind-wandering reports? A secondary data analysis of how few thought probes are enough for reliable and valid measurement.

Authors:  Matthew S Welhaf; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 2.  The relationship between mind wandering and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paola Bonifacci; Cinzia Viroli; Chiara Vassura; Elisa Colombini; Lorenzo Desideri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  Individual differences in dimensions of mind wandering: the mediating role of emotional valence and intentionality.

Authors:  Jonathan B Banks; Matthew S Welhaf
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-31

4.  Do Attentional Lapses Account for the Worst Performance Rule?

Authors:  Christoph Löffler; Gidon T Frischkorn; Jan Rummel; Dirk Hagemann; Anna-Lena Schubert
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2021-12-24

5.  The contribution of latent factors of executive functioning to mind wandering: an experience sampling study.

Authors:  David Marcusson-Clavertz; Stefan D Persson; Etzel Cardeña; Devin B Terhune; Cassandra Gort; Christine Kuehner
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-04-25

6.  On the relationship between mind wandering and mindfulness.

Authors:  Angelo Belardi; Leila Chaieb; Alodie Rey-Mermet; Florian Mormann; Nicolas Rothen; Juergen Fell; Thomas P Reber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Personality and Mind-Wandering Self-Perception: The Role of Meta-Awareness.

Authors:  Miguel Ibaceta; Hector P Madrid
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-15

8.  Attention Matters: How Orchestrating Attention May Relate to Classroom Learning.

Authors:  Arielle S Keller; Ido Davidesco; Kimberly D Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.