Literature DB >> 32061956

Long-Term Outcomes in Ventriculoatrial Shunt Surgery in Patients with Pediatric Hydrocephalus: Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Matthias Gmeiner1, Helga Wagner2, Willem J R van Ouwerkerk3, Gracija Sardi4, Wolfgang Thomae4, Wolfgang Senker4, Kurt Holl4, Andreas Gruber5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Long-term outcomes are rarely reported for patients with pediatric hydrocephalus. Ventriculoperitoneal shunting is the surgical standard; nevertheless, in selected patients, a ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) remains an important alternative. This study aimed to analyze the causes of VAS revisions and complications.
METHODS: Pediatric patients who underwent their first shunt operation between 1982 and 1992 were included. The timing, cause, and modality of VAS revisions were retrospectively determined.
RESULTS: Overall, 138 patients were treated for hydrocephalus and 61 patients received a VAS during the follow-up period. A primary VAS was the first shunt type in 42 (68.85%) patients. In 19 (31.15%) patients, conversions to second-line VAS were carried out. The rates of VAS revisions performed for dysfunction or elective lengthening of a short atrial catheter were 52.2% and 22.9%, respectively. There was no difference in the number of VAS revisions between patients with primary VASs and second-line VASs. Age at VAS and etiology of hydrocephalus had no effect on the number of revisions. Specific VAS complications were observed in 2 patients. Deep positioning of the distal catheter led to asymptomatic tricuspid regurgitation that was reversible after shortening of the atrial catheter. Another patient presented with shunt nephritis and completely recovered after the atrial catheter was replaced with a peritoneal catheter.
CONCLUSIONS: VAS remains an appropriate second-line alternative in selected patients. Specific VAS complications were rarely observed and completely reversible after treatment. However, regular and specific follow-up examinations are strongly recommended to avoid cardiopulmonary or renal complications.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrocephalus; Long-term outcome; Shunt nephritis; Thromboembolic complications; Ventriculoatrial shunt

Year:  2020        PMID: 32061956     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

1.  Should not we be using aspirin in patients with a ventriculoatrial shunt? Borrowing a leaf from other specialities: a case for surrogate evidence.

Authors:  Suhas Udayakumaran; Shine Kumar
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Case Series of Ventriculoatrial Shunt placement in Hybrid Room: Reassessment of Ventriculoatrial Shunt.

Authors:  Young Ha Kim; Sang Weon Lee; Dong Hyun Kim; Chi Hyung Lee; Chang Hyeun Kim; Soon Ki Sung; Dong Wuk Son; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-10-28

3.  Ventriculo-atrial shunt. Comparison of an ultrasound-guided peel-away technique versus conventional technique in the management of normal pressure hydrocephalus: A retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Andrés Segura-Hernández; Fernando Hakim; Juan F Ramón; Enrique Jiménez-Hakim; Juan A Mejía-Cordovez; Diego Quintero-Rueda; Yessid Araque-Puello; Camila Pedraza-Ciro; Juan P Leal-Isaza; Juliana Mendoza-Mantilla; Vanesa Robles; Martina Gonzalez; Daniel Jaramillo-Velásquez; Diego F Gómez
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-10-19

Review 4.  Thrombosis associated with ventriculoatrial shunts.

Authors:  Dengjun Wu; Zhengyan Guan; Limin Xiao; Donghai Li
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.042

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.