Literature DB >> 32061795

Machine learning in the clinical microbiology laboratory: has the time come for routine practice?

N Peiffer-Smadja1, S Dellière2, C Rodriguez3, G Birgand4, F-X Lescure5, S Fourati3, E Ruppé6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) allows the analysis of complex and large data sets and has the potential to improve health care. The clinical microbiology laboratory, at the interface of clinical practice and diagnostics, is of special interest for the development of ML systems. AIMS: This narrative review aims to explore the current use of ML In clinical microbiology. SOURCES: References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, biorXiv, arXiV, ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore Digital Library up to November 2019. CONTENT: We found 97 ML systems aiming to assist clinical microbiologists. Overall, 82 ML systems (85%) targeted bacterial infections, 11 (11%) parasitic infections, nine (9%) viral infections and three (3%) fungal infections. Forty ML systems (41%) focused on microorganism detection, identification and quantification, 36 (37%) evaluated antimicrobial susceptibility, and 21 (22%) targeted the diagnosis, disease classification and prediction of clinical outcomes. The ML systems used very diverse data sources: 21 (22%) used genomic data of microorganisms, 19 (20%) microbiota data obtained by metagenomic sequencing, 19 (20%) analysed microscopic images, 17 (18%) spectroscopy data, eight (8%) targeted gene sequencing, six (6%) volatile organic compounds, four (4%) photographs of bacterial colonies, four (4%) transcriptome data, three (3%) protein structure, and three (3%) clinical data. Most systems used data from high-income countries (n = 71, 73%) but a significant number used data from low- and middle-income countries (n = 36, 37%). Performance measures were reported for the 97 ML systems, but no article described their use in clinical practice or reported impact on processes or clinical outcomes. IMPLICATIONS: In clinical microbiology, ML has been used with various data sources and diverse practical applications. The evaluation and implementation processes represent the main gap in existing ML systems, requiring a focus on their interpretability and potential integration into real-world settings.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Clinical microbiology; Implementation science; Information technology; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32061795     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  21 in total

1.  Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence Are Emerging Diagnostic Tools for the Clinical Microbiologist.

Authors:  Daniel D Rhoads
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Development of a Machine learning image segmentation-based algorithm for the determination of the adequacy of Gram-stained sputum smear images.

Authors:  Manraj Sirohi; Mahima Lall; Swapna Yenishetti; Lakshmi Panat; Ajai Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-11-28

3.  Integrating Artificial Intelligence for Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis - a Review.

Authors:  Taran Rishit Undru; Utkarsha Uday; Jyothi Tadi Lakshmi; Ariyanachi Kaliappan; Saranya Mallamgunta; Shalam Sheerin Nikhat; V Sakthivadivel; Archana Gaur
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

4.  One Day in Denmark: Comparison of Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Bacterial Isolates From Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Ana Rita Rebelo; Valeria Bortolaia; Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon; Dennis Schrøder Hansen; Hans Linde Nielsen; Svend Ellermann-Eriksen; Michael Kemp; Bent Løwe Røder; Niels Frimodt-Møller; Turid Snekloth Søndergaard; John Eugenio Coia; Claus Østergaard; Henrik Westh; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  THz-ATR Spectroscopy Integrated with Species Recognition Based on Multi-Classifier Voting for Automated Clinical Microbial Identification.

Authors:  Wenjing Yu; Jia Shi; Guorong Huang; Jie Zhou; Xinyu Zhan; Zekang Guo; Huiyan Tian; Fengxin Xie; Xiang Yang; Weiling Fu
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  Evaluation of Commercial Concentration Methods for Microscopic Diagnosis of Protozoa and Helminths in Human Stool Samples in a Non-Endemic Area.

Authors:  Brice Autier; Jean-Pierre Gangneux; Florence Robert-Gangneux
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 7.  Engineering the Microbiome to Prevent Adverse Events: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Saad Khan; Ruth Hauptman; Libusha Kelly
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 16.459

Review 8.  Digital microbiology.

Authors:  A Egli; J Schrenzel; G Greub
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 9.  Future developments in training.

Authors:  Katharina Last; Nicholas R Power; Sarah Dellière; Petar Velikov; Anja Šterbenc; Ivana Antal Antunovic; Maria João Lopes; Valentijn Schweitzer; Aleksandra Barac
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  A Nomogram for Preoperatively Predicting the Ki-67 Index of a Pituitary Tumor: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Xiangming Cai; Junhao Zhu; Jin Yang; Chao Tang; Feng Yuan; Zixiang Cong; Chiyuan Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.