Literature DB >> 32061707

Influence of front-of-pack labelling and regulated nutrition claims on consumers' perceptions of product healthfulness and purchase intentions: A randomized controlled trial.

Beatriz Franco-Arellano1, Lana Vanderlee2, Mavra Ahmed3, Angela Oh4, Mary L'Abbé5.   

Abstract

Mandatory front-of-pack (FOP) labelling was proposed in Canada to highlight foods with high contents of sugars, sodium and/or saturated fats, which would be displayed on labels along with the mandatory Nutrition Facts table and voluntary nutrition claims. In an online survey, participants (n = 1997) were randomized to one of four FOP labelling conditions: 1) control, 2) warning label, 3) health star rating or 4) traffic light labelling. Participants were shown four drinks (a healthier drink with or without a disease risk reduction claim, a healthier drink with or without a nutrient content claim, a less healthy drink with or without a disease risk reduction claim and a less healthy drink with or without a nutrient content claim) in random order and one at a time. Participants rated perceived product healthfulness and purchase intentions using a 7-point Likert scale. Participants could access the Nutrition Facts table while viewing labels. Results showed less healthy drinks displaying any FOP labelling were perceived as less healthy compared to the control. In healthier drinks, health star rating and traffic light labelling created a 'halo' effect, which was not observed with warning labels. Similar results were observed with purchase intentions. Drinks displaying a disease risk reduction claim were perceived as healthier than those without (p < 0.001) regardless of product's healthfulness. The effect of a nutrient content claim was not significantly different. The effect of FOP labelling and claims was mitigated for those who used the Nutrition Facts table. FOP labelling was likely helpful for consumers with different levels of health literacy. Overall, FOP labelling had significantly stronger influence than nutrition claims on consumers' perceptions; however, the effect of each FOP label varied on healthier and less healthy drinks.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canada; Consumers' perceptions; Food labels; Front-of-pack labeling; Nutrition claims

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32061707     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  17 in total

1.  How Do Nutritional Warnings Work on Commercial Products? Results From a Hypothetical Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Marcela de Alcantara; Gastón Ares; Rosires Deliza
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Influence of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Food Attributes on Consumers' Acceptance of Reformulated Food Products: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anja Bolha; Urška Blaznik; Mojca Korošec
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2020-12-31

3.  The Nutritional Profile and On-Pack Marketing of Toddler-Specific Food Products Launched in Australia between 1996 and 2020.

Authors:  Jennifer R McCann; Catherine G Russell; Julie L Woods
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Nudging customers towards healthier food and beverage purchases in a real-life online supermarket: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Josine M Stuber; Jeroen Lakerveld; Loes W Kievitsbosch; Joreintje D Mackenbach; Joline W J Beulens
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Types and Aspects of Front-of-Package Labeling Preferred by Parents: Insights for Policy Making in China.

Authors:  Jia Cui; Ruijie Yan; Thomas Astell-Burt; Enying Gong; Lutong Zheng; Xinxuan Li; Jingwen Zhang; Lin Xiang; Lihong Ye; Yiluan Hu; Yuxiang Tang; Chao Gao; Li Xiao; Yan Jiang; Ruitai Shao; Xiaoqi Feng; Juan Zhang; Yuexin Yang
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  The influence of the Nutri-Score on the perceived healthiness of foods labelled with a nutrition claim of sugar.

Authors:  Kristin Jürkenbeck; Clara Mehlhose; Anke Zühlsdorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Consumers' Implicit and Explicit Recall, Understanding and Perceptions of Products with Nutrition-Related Messages: An Online Survey.

Authors:  Beatriz Franco-Arellano; Lana Vanderlee; Mavra Ahmed; Angela Oh; Mary R L'Abbé
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Supermarket Circulars Promoting the Sales of 'Healthy' Foods: Analysis Based on Degree of Processing.

Authors:  Alyne Michelle Botelho; Anice Milbratz de Camargo; Kharla Janinny Medeiros; Gabriella Beatriz Irmão; Moira Dean; Giovanna Medeiros Rataichesck Fiates
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Nitrate Is Nitrate: The Status Quo of Using Nitrate through Vegetable Extracts in Meat Products.

Authors:  Patrícia Bernardo; Luís Patarata; Jose M Lorenzo; Maria João Fraqueza
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-05

10.  A human rights-based approach to non-communicable diseases: mandating front-of-package warning labels.

Authors:  Andrés Constantin; Oscar A Cabrera; Belén Ríos; Isabel Barbosa; Ariadna Tovar Ramírez; Margherita M Cinà; Silvia Serrano Guzmán
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.