Stephanie Crossen1,2, Guibo Xing3, Jeffrey S Hoch3,4. 1. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, California. 2. OptumLabs Visiting Fellow, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 3. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, California. 4. Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Modern therapy for type 1 diabetes (T1D) increasingly utilizes technology such as insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). Prior analyses suggest that T1D costs are driven by preventable hospitalizations, but recent escalations in insulin prices and use of technology may have changed the cost landscape. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of T1D medical costs from 2012 to 2016 using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a comprehensive database of deidentified administrative claims for commercial insurance enrollees. Our study population included 9445 individuals aged ≤18 years with T1D and ≥13 months of continuous enrollment. Costs were categorized into ambulatory care, hospital care, insulin, diabetes technology, and diabetes supplies. Mean costs for each category in each year were adjusted for inflation, as well as patient-level covariates including age, sex, race, census region, and mental health comorbidity. RESULTS: Mean annual cost of T1D care increased from $11 178 in 2012 to $17 060 in 2016, driven primarily by growth in the cost of insulin ($3285 to $6255) and cost of diabetes technology ($1747 to $4581). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the cost of T1D care is now driven by mounting insulin prices and growing utilization and cost of diabetes technology. Given the positive effects of pumps and CGMs on T1D health outcomes, it is possible that short-term costs are offset by future savings. Long-term cost-effectiveness analyses should be undertaken to inform providers, payers, and policy-makers about how to support optimal T1D care in an era of increasing reliance on therapeutic technology.
BACKGROUND: Modern therapy for type 1 diabetes (T1D) increasingly utilizes technology such as insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). Prior analyses suggest that T1D costs are driven by preventable hospitalizations, but recent escalations in insulin prices and use of technology may have changed the cost landscape. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of T1D medical costs from 2012 to 2016 using the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a comprehensive database of deidentified administrative claims for commercial insurance enrollees. Our study population included 9445 individuals aged ≤18 years with T1D and ≥13 months of continuous enrollment. Costs were categorized into ambulatory care, hospital care, insulin, diabetes technology, and diabetes supplies. Mean costs for each category in each year were adjusted for inflation, as well as patient-level covariates including age, sex, race, census region, and mental health comorbidity. RESULTS: Mean annual cost of T1D care increased from $11 178 in 2012 to $17 060 in 2016, driven primarily by growth in the cost of insulin ($3285 to $6255) and cost of diabetes technology ($1747 to $4581). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the cost of T1D care is now driven by mounting insulin prices and growing utilization and cost of diabetes technology. Given the positive effects of pumps and CGMs on T1D health outcomes, it is possible that short-term costs are offset by future savings. Long-term cost-effectiveness analyses should be undertaken to inform providers, payers, and policy-makers about how to support optimal T1D care in an era of increasing reliance on therapeutic technology.
Authors: Jennifer L Sherr; Martin Tauschmann; Tadej Battelino; Martin de Bock; Gregory Forlenza; Rossana Roman; Korey K Hood; David M Maahs Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Nicole C Foster; Roy W Beck; Kellee M Miller; Mark A Clements; Michael R Rickels; Linda A DiMeglio; David M Maahs; William V Tamborlane; Richard Bergenstal; Elizabeth Smith; Beth A Olson; Satish K Garg Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Bedowra Zabeen; Maria E Craig; Sohaib A Virk; Alison Pryke; Albert K F Chan; Yoon Hi Cho; Paul Z Benitez-Aguirre; Stephen Hing; Kim C Donaghue Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David J Pettitt; Jennifer Talton; Dana Dabelea; Jasmin Divers; Giuseppina Imperatore; Jean M Lawrence; Angela D Liese; Barbara Linder; Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Catherine Pihoker; Sharon H Saydah; Debra A Standiford; Richard F Hamman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 19.112