Literature DB >> 32060993

Inhibition of human CYP1 enzymes by a classical inhibitor α-naphthoflavone and a novel inhibitor N-(3, 5-dichlorophenyl)cyclopropanecarboxamide: An in vitro and in silico study.

Risto Olavi Juvonen1, Elmeri Matias Jokinen2, Adeel Javaid1, Marko Lehtonen1,3, Hannu Raunio1, Olli Taneli Pentikäinen2.   

Abstract

Enzymes in the cytochrome P450 family 1 (CYP1) catalyze metabolic activation of procarcinogens and deactivation of certain anticancer drugs. Inhibition of these enzymes is a potential approach for cancer chemoprevention and treatment of CYP1-mediated drug resistance. We characterized inhibition of human CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1 enzymes by the novel inhibitor N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)cyclopropanecarboxamide (DCPCC) and α-naphthoflavone (ANF). Depending on substrate, IC50 values of DCPCC for CYP1A1 or CYP1B1 were 10-95 times higher than for CYP1A2. IC50 of DCPCC for CYP1A2 was 100-fold lower than for enzymes in CYP2 and CYP3 families. DCPCC IC50 values were 10-680 times higher than the ones of ANF. DCPCC was a mixed-type inhibitor of CYP1A2. ANF was a competitive tight-binding inhibitor of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1. CYP1A1 oxidized DCPCC more rapidly than CYP1A2 or CYP1B1 to the same metabolite. Molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy calculations explained the differences of binding of DCPCC and ANF to the active sites of all three CYP1 enzymes. We conclude that DCPCC is a more selective inhibitor for CYP1A2 than ANF. DCPCC is a candidate structure to modulate CYP1A2-mediated metabolism of procarcinogens and anticancer drugs.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP; N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)cyclopropanecarboxamide; human; inhibition; mechanism; α-naphthoflavone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32060993     DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des        ISSN: 1747-0277            Impact factor:   2.817


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of the CYP1A2 Inhibition-Mediated Drug Interaction Potential for Pinocembrin Using In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Approaches.

Authors:  Shipra Bhatt; Sumit Dhiman; Vinay Kumar; Abhishek Gour; Diksha Manhas; Kuhu Sharma; Probir Kumar Ojha; Utpal Nandi
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-02

2.  Substrate Selectivity of Coumarin Derivatives by Human CYP1 Enzymes: In Vitro Enzyme Kinetics and In Silico Modeling.

Authors:  Risto O Juvonen; Mira Ahinko; Elmeri M Jokinen; Juhani Huuskonen; Hannu Raunio; Olli T Pentikäinen
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-04-19

3.  Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-induced Pulmonary Carcinogenesis in Cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A1- and 1A2-Null Mice: Roles of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2.

Authors:  Grady Gastelum; Weiwu Jiang; Lihua Wang; Guodong Zhou; Roshan Borkar; Nagireddy Putluri; Bhagavatula Moorthy
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Coumarin-Based Profluorescent and Fluorescent Substrates for Determining Xenobiotic-Metabolizing Enzyme Activities In Vitro.

Authors:  Hannu Raunio; Olli Pentikäinen; Risto O Juvonen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  A Comprehensive Evaluation of Sdox, a Promising H2S-Releasing Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Chemoresistant Tumors.

Authors:  Petko Alov; Merilin Al Sharif; Denitsa Aluani; Konstantin Chegaev; Jelena Dinic; Aleksandra Divac Rankov; Miguel X Fernandes; Fabio Fusi; Alfonso T García-Sosa; Risto Juvonen; Magdalena Kondeva-Burdina; José M Padrón; Ilza Pajeva; Tania Pencheva; Adrián Puerta; Hannu Raunio; Chiara Riganti; Ivanka Tsakovska; Virginia Tzankova; Yordan Yordanov; Simona Saponara
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.