Literature DB >> 32060705

Management of bone metastasis with intravenous bisphosphonates in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of dosing frequency.

Mei Yang1, Xijie Yu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are wildly used in breast cancer patients with bone metastasis and generally administrated every 4 weeks to lessen the risk of subsequent skeletal-related events. Bisphosphonates administration every 12 weeks is also recommended in some guidelines. Recent clinical trials suggested that bisphosphonate treatment with reduced frequency (every 12 weeks) to be non-inferior to standard therapy. The object of this analysis was to contrast the efficacy and safety of these two treatment strategies.
METHOD: We systematically retrieved databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from 1947 to present for clinical trials comparing the efficacy between standard (every 4 weeks) and de-escalation (every 12 weeks) treatment of bisphosphates.
RESULTS: We identified 4 articles with available data from 4 randomized clinical trials (n = 1721). Administration of bisphosphate every 12 weeks was non-inferior to administration every 4 weeks. There existed no significant difference in on-study skeletal-related events, renal dysfunction, and osteonecrosis of jaw. In the exploratory study, patients who received intravenous bisphosphates before enrollment experienced less on-study skeletal-related events and significant difference was observed between groups.
CONCLUSION: This analysis suggested that de-escalation treatment with bisphosphates may be superior to standard treatment in terms of efficacy, safety, and economic costs. But it would be better that all the patients receive bisphosphates every 4 weeks for several months before de-escalation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisphosphates; Bone metastasis; Breast cancer; De-escalation treatment; Skeletal related events

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32060705     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05355-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  11 in total

1.  Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Song; T A Sheldon; A J Sutton; K R Abrams; D R Jones
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Role of Bone-Modifying Agents in Metastatic Breast Cancer: An American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario Focused Guideline Update.

Authors:  Catherine Van Poznak; Mark R Somerfield; William E Barlow; J Sybil Biermann; Linda D Bosserman; Mark J Clemons; Sukhbinder K Dhesy-Thind; Melissa S Dillmon; Andrea Eisen; Elizabeth S Frank; Reshma Jagsi; Rachel Jimenez; Richard L Theriault; Theodore A Vandenberg; Gary C Yee; Beverly Moy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Breast cancer subtypes predispose the site of distant metastases.

Authors:  Abha Soni; Zhiyong Ren; Omar Hameed; Diptiman Chanda; Charity J Morgan; Gene P Siegal; Shi Wei
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 6.  Breast cancer osteomimicry and its role in bone specific metastasis; an integrative, systematic review of preclinical evidence.

Authors:  Olugbenga Awolaran; Susan A Brooks; Verna Lavender
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases in breast carcinoma patients with at least one osteolytic lesion.

Authors:  Lee S Rosen; David H Gordon; William Dugan; Pierre Major; Peter D Eisenberg; Louise Provencher; Mary Kaminski; Joe Simeone; John Seaman; Bee-Lian Chen; Robert E Coleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials.

Authors:  Allan Lipton; Karim Fizazi; Alison T Stopeck; David H Henry; Janet E Brown; Denise A Yardley; Gary E Richardson; Salvatore Siena; Pablo Maroto; Michael Clemens; Boris Bilynskyy; Veena Charu; Philippe Beuzeboc; Michael Rader; Maria Viniegra; Fred Saad; Chunlei Ke; Ada Braun; Susie Jun
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2009-07-21

10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing zoledronic acid administered at 12-week and 4-week intervals in patients with bone metastasis.

Authors:  Ling Cao; Yong-Jing Yang; Jian-Dong Diao; Xu-He Zhang; Yan-Ling Liu; Bo-Yu Wang; Zhi-Wen Li; Shi-Xin Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-03
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Antiresorptive Agents in Benign and Malignant Diseases: A Critical Review Organized by the ECTS.

Authors:  Athanasios D Anastasilakis; Jessica Pepe; Nicola Napoli; Andrea Palermo; Christos Magopoulos; Aliya A Khan; M Carola Zillikens; Jean-Jacques Body
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.134

2.  Management of bone metastasis and cancer treatment-induced bone loss during the COVID-19 pandemic: An international perspective and recommendations.

Authors:  J E Brown; S L Wood; C Confavreux; M Abe; K Weilbaecher; P Hadji; R W Johnson; J A Rhoades; C M Edwards; P I Croucher; P Juarez; S El Badri; G Ariaspinilla; S D'Oronzo; T A Guise; C Van Poznak
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.072

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.