Mei Yang1, Xijie Yu2. 1. Laboratory of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Endocrinology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China 610041, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. 2. Laboratory of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Endocrinology, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China 610041, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. xijieyu@scu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are wildly used in breast cancer patients with bone metastasis and generally administrated every 4 weeks to lessen the risk of subsequent skeletal-related events. Bisphosphonates administration every 12 weeks is also recommended in some guidelines. Recent clinical trials suggested that bisphosphonate treatment with reduced frequency (every 12 weeks) to be non-inferior to standard therapy. The object of this analysis was to contrast the efficacy and safety of these two treatment strategies. METHOD: We systematically retrieved databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from 1947 to present for clinical trials comparing the efficacy between standard (every 4 weeks) and de-escalation (every 12 weeks) treatment of bisphosphates. RESULTS: We identified 4 articles with available data from 4 randomized clinical trials (n = 1721). Administration of bisphosphate every 12 weeks was non-inferior to administration every 4 weeks. There existed no significant difference in on-study skeletal-related events, renal dysfunction, and osteonecrosis of jaw. In the exploratory study, patients who received intravenous bisphosphates before enrollment experienced less on-study skeletal-related events and significant difference was observed between groups. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggested that de-escalation treatment with bisphosphates may be superior to standard treatment in terms of efficacy, safety, and economic costs. But it would be better that all the patients receive bisphosphates every 4 weeks for several months before de-escalation.
BACKGROUND:Bisphosphonates are wildly used in breast cancerpatients with bone metastasis and generally administrated every 4 weeks to lessen the risk of subsequent skeletal-related events. Bisphosphonates administration every 12 weeks is also recommended in some guidelines. Recent clinical trials suggested that bisphosphonate treatment with reduced frequency (every 12 weeks) to be non-inferior to standard therapy. The object of this analysis was to contrast the efficacy and safety of these two treatment strategies. METHOD: We systematically retrieved databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from 1947 to present for clinical trials comparing the efficacy between standard (every 4 weeks) and de-escalation (every 12 weeks) treatment of bisphosphates. RESULTS: We identified 4 articles with available data from 4 randomized clinical trials (n = 1721). Administration of bisphosphate every 12 weeks was non-inferior to administration every 4 weeks. There existed no significant difference in on-study skeletal-related events, renal dysfunction, and osteonecrosis of jaw. In the exploratory study, patients who received intravenous bisphosphates before enrollment experienced less on-study skeletal-related events and significant difference was observed between groups. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggested that de-escalation treatment with bisphosphates may be superior to standard treatment in terms of efficacy, safety, and economic costs. But it would be better that all the patients receive bisphosphates every 4 weeks for several months before de-escalation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bisphosphates; Bone metastasis; Breast cancer; De-escalation treatment; Skeletal related events
Authors: Catherine Van Poznak; Mark R Somerfield; William E Barlow; J Sybil Biermann; Linda D Bosserman; Mark J Clemons; Sukhbinder K Dhesy-Thind; Melissa S Dillmon; Andrea Eisen; Elizabeth S Frank; Reshma Jagsi; Rachel Jimenez; Richard L Theriault; Theodore A Vandenberg; Gary C Yee; Beverly Moy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lee S Rosen; David H Gordon; William Dugan; Pierre Major; Peter D Eisenberg; Louise Provencher; Mary Kaminski; Joe Simeone; John Seaman; Bee-Lian Chen; Robert E Coleman Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Allan Lipton; Karim Fizazi; Alison T Stopeck; David H Henry; Janet E Brown; Denise A Yardley; Gary E Richardson; Salvatore Siena; Pablo Maroto; Michael Clemens; Boris Bilynskyy; Veena Charu; Philippe Beuzeboc; Michael Rader; Maria Viniegra; Fred Saad; Chunlei Ke; Ada Braun; Susie Jun Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: J E Brown; S L Wood; C Confavreux; M Abe; K Weilbaecher; P Hadji; R W Johnson; J A Rhoades; C M Edwards; P I Croucher; P Juarez; S El Badri; G Ariaspinilla; S D'Oronzo; T A Guise; C Van Poznak Journal: J Bone Oncol Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 4.072