Literature DB >> 32060141

Psychological, social and contextual factors across recovery stages following a sport-related knee injury: a scoping review.

Linda K Truong1,2,3, Amber D Mosewich4, Christopher J Holt2, Christina Y Le2,3, Maxi Miciak2,5, Jackie L Whittaker6,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the role of psychological, social and contextual factors across the recovery stages (ie, acute, rehabilitation or return to sport (RTS)) following a traumatic time-loss sport-related knee injury.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews and Arksey and O'Malley framework. Six databases were searched using predetermined search terms. Included studies consisted of original data written in English that identified or described a psychological, social or contextual factor related to recovery after a traumatic time-loss sport-related knee injury. Two authors independently conducted title-abstract and full-text reviews. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Thematic analysis was undertaken.
RESULTS: Of 7289 records, 77 studies representing 5540 participants (37% women, 84% anterior cruciate ligament tears, aged 14-60 years) were included. Psychological factors were investigated across all studies, while social and contextual factors were assessed in 39% and 21% of included studies, respectively. A cross-cutting concept of individualisation was present across four psychological (barriers to progress, active coping, independence and recovery expectations), two social (social support and engagement in care) and two contextual (environmental influences and sport culture) themes. Athletes report multiple barriers to recovery and valued their autonomy, having an active role in their recovery and diverse social support.
CONCLUSION: Diverse psychological, social and contextual factors are present and influence all stages of recovery following a traumatic sport-related knee injury. A better understanding of these factors at the time of injury and throughout rehabilitation could assist with optimising injury management, promoting RTS, and long-term health-related quality-of-life. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knee injuries; recovery; rehabilitation; review; sporting injuries

Year:  2020        PMID: 32060141     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  14 in total

1.  A qualitative assessment of return to sport following Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  Joshua G Peterson; Vehniah K Tjong; Mitesh P Mehta; Bailey N Goyette; Milap Patel; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-24

Review 2.  Exploring what is important to patients with regards to quality of life after experiencing a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  H Leggett; A Scantlebury; A Byrne; M Harden; C Hewitt; G O'Carroll; H Sharma; C McDaid
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Hop tests and psychological PROs provide a demanding and clinician-friendly RTS assessment of patients after ACL reconstruction, a registry study.

Authors:  Ramana Piussi; Susanne Beischer; Roland Thomeé; Eric Hamrin Senorski
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-13

4.  Exercise-therapy and education for individuals one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Brooke E Patterson; Christian J Barton; Adam G Culvenor; Randall L Cooper; Kay M Crossley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Efficacy of the SOAR knee health program: protocol for a two-arm stepped-wedge randomized delayed-controlled trial.

Authors:  Jackie L Whittaker; Linda K Truong; Justin M Losciale; Trish Silvester-Lee; Maxi Miciak; Andrea Pajkic; Christina Y Le; Alison M Hoens; Amber Mosewich; Michael A Hunt; Linda C Li; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Fear of Reinjury Following Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: An Exploratory Analysis of the NACOX Multicenter Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Stephanie Filbay; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Disrupted knee - disrupted me: a strenuous process of regaining balance in the aftermath of an anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Josefin Karlström; Maria Wiklund; Eva Tengman
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Addressing Psychological Factors in Sports Injury Rehabilitation - What is a Physical Therapist to do?

Authors:  Niklas Cederström; Simon Granér; Eva Ageberg
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-02-01

9.  To Reconstruct the Anterior Cruciate Ligament or Not? - Put into Panther Perspective.

Authors:  Kristian Thorborg
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 10.  Screening Tests for Assessing Athletes at Risk of ACL Injury or Reinjury-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Noah Schweizer; Gerda Strutzenberger; Martino V Franchi; Mazda Farshad; Johannes Scherr; Jörg Spörri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.