Literature DB >> 32060007

GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.

Holger J Schünemann1, Reem A Mustafa2, Jan Brozek3, Karen R Steingart4, Mariska Leeflang5, Mohammad Hassan Murad6, Patrick Bossuyt5, Paul Glasziou7, Roman Jaeschke3, Stefan Lange8, Joerg Meerpohl9, Miranda Langendam5, Monica Hultcrantz10, Gunn E Vist11, Elie A Akl12, Mark Helfand13, Nancy Santesso3, Lotty Hooft14, Rob Scholten14, Måns Rosen10, Anne Rutjes15, Mark Crowther3, Paola Muti16, Heike Raatz17, Mohammed T Ansari18, John Williams19, Regina Kunz20, Jeff Harris21, Ingrid Arévalo Rodriguez22, Mikashmi Kohli23, Gordon H Guyatt24.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article provides updated GRADE guidance about how authors of systematic reviews and health technology assessments and guideline developers can assess the results and the certainty of evidence (also known as quality of the evidence or confidence in the estimates) of a body of evidence addressing test accuracy (TA). STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We present an overview of the GRADE approach and guidance for rating certainty in TA in clinical and public health and review the presentation of results of a body of evidence regarding tests. Part 1 of the two parts in this 21st guidance article about how to apply GRADE focuses on understanding study design issues in test accuracy, provide an overview of the domains, and describe risk of bias and indirectness specifically.
RESULTS: Supplemented by practical examples, we describe how raters of the evidence using GRADE can evaluate study designs focusing on tests and how they apply the GRADE domains risk of bias and indirectness to a body of evidence of TA studies.
CONCLUSION: Rating the certainty of a body of evidence using GRADE in Cochrane and other reviews and World Health Organization and other guidelines dealing with in TA studies helped refining our approach. The resulting guidance will help applying GRADE successfully for questions and recommendations focusing on tests.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Certainty of evidence; Diagnosis; Diagnostic accuracy; GRADE; Test accuracy; Tests

Year:  2020        PMID: 32060007     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  47 in total

1.  A user guide to the American Society of Hematology clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Ariel Izcovich; Adam Cuker; Robert Kunkle; Ignacio Neumann; Julie Panepinto; Menaka Pai; Matthew Seftel; Matthew C Cheung; Richard Lottenberg; Michael Byrne; Robert Plovnick; Deirdra Terrell; Jennifer L Holter-Chakrabarty; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Lisa K Hicks; Wojtek Wiercioch; Robby Nieuwlaat; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-12

2.  Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra and Xpert MTB/RIF assays for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults.

Authors:  Mikashmi Kohli; Ian Schiller; Nandini Dendukuri; Mandy Yao; Keertan Dheda; Claudia M Denkinger; Samuel G Schumacher; Karen R Steingart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Can gray values be converted to Hounsfield units? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marjorie Eguren; Anderson Holguin; Karla Diaz; Jose Vidalon; Carlos Linan; Camila Pacheco-Pereira; Manuel Oscar Lagravere Vich
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert Ultra assays for screening for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults, irrespective of signs or symptoms.

Authors:  Adrienne E Shapiro; Jennifer M Ross; Mandy Yao; Ian Schiller; Mikashmi Kohli; Nandini Dendukuri; Karen R Steingart; David J Horne
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-23

5.  Abdominal ultrasound and alpha-foetoprotein for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Agostino Colli; Tin Nadarevic; Damir Miletic; Vanja Giljaca; Mirella Fraquelli; Davor Štimac; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Ultrasound for the diagnosis of malrotation and volvulus in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  HaiThuy N Nguyen; Madhulika Kulkarni; Jisha Jose; Amy Sisson; Mary L Brandt; Marla B K Sammer; Mohan Pammi
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Paula D James; Nathan T Connell; Barbara Ameer; Jorge Di Paola; Jeroen Eikenboom; Nicolas Giraud; Sandra Haberichter; Vicki Jacobs-Pratt; Barbara Konkle; Claire McLintock; Simon McRae; Robert R Montgomery; James S O'Donnell; Nikole Scappe; Robert Sidonio; Veronica H Flood; Nedaa Husainat; Mohamad A Kalot; Reem A Mustafa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 8.  Preoperative Lung Ultrasound to Detect Pleural Adhesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Akihiro Shiroshita; Kiyoshi Nakashima; Masafumi Takeshita; Yuki Kataoka
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-06

9.  Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Shayesteh Jahanfar; Jacqueline J Ho; Sharifah Halimah Jaafar; Iosief Abraha; Mohaddesseh Noura; Cassandra R Ross; Mohan Pammi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-09

10.  Association of statin use in older people primary prevention group with risk of cardiovascular events and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Kamal Awad; Maged Mohammed; Mahmoud Mohamed Zaki; Abdelrahman I Abushouk; Gregory Y H Lip; Michael J Blaha; Carl J Lavie; Peter P Toth; J Wouter Jukema; Naveed Sattar; Maciej Banach
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.