| Literature DB >> 32059790 |
Ramanan Laxminarayan1, Thomas Van Boeckel2, Isabel Frost3, Samuel Kariuki4, Ejaz Ahmed Khan5, Direk Limmathurotsakul6, D G Joakim Larsson7, Gabriel Levy-Hara8, Marc Mendelson9, Kevin Outterson10, Sharon J Peacock11, Yong-Guan Zhu12.
Abstract
In 2013, a Lancet Infectious Diseases Commission described the state of antimicrobial resistance worldwide. Since then, greater awareness of the public health ramifications of antimicrobial resistance has led to national actions and global initiatives, including a resolution at the high-level meeting of the UN General Assembly in 2016. Progress in addressing this issue has ranged from a ban on irrational drug combinations in India to commitments to ban colistin as a growth promoter in animals, improve hospital infection control, and implement better antimicrobial stewardship. Funds have been mobilised, and regulatory barriers to new antibiotic development have been relaxed. These efforts have been episodic and uneven across countries, however. Sustained funding for antimicrobial resistance and globally harmonised targets to monitor progress are still urgently needed. Except for in a few leading countries, antimicrobial resistance has not captured the sustained focus of national leaders and country-level actors, including care providers.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32059790 DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30003-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Infect Dis ISSN: 1473-3099 Impact factor: 25.071