Literature DB >> 32059752

Attitudes Toward Animal Research Among Medical Students in the United States.

David Q Beversdorf1, Nellie R Adams2.   

Abstract

Prior to use in patients in the clinical setting, the safety, mechanism of action, and efficacy of new treatments must be established. This often requires testing new treatments in animals. Public attitudes toward animal research have been investigated, but less is known about the attitudes of physicians. To begin to address this, we examined attitudes of medical students regarding animal research, and whether these attitudes were rigidly held. We surveyed US-based student members of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). Students were questioned regarding agreement or disagreement with a set of 14 positively- or negatively-biased statements regarding animal research. To determine if these attitudes were rigidly held, students viewed an educational video regarding animals used in research and repeated the survey immediately after the video. One hundred sixty-eight students completed the initial survey. A group attitude score was calculated based on agreement with 14 statements. Males and those with previous research experience had a significantly more positive attitude toward animal research, but other variables had no effect. After viewing the video, 108 students repeated the survey. The overall attitude of respondents changed to be significantly more positive toward animal research. Of the 14 statements, attitudes toward 7 individual statements became significantly more positive after viewing the video. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine attitudes toward animal research among medical students. Overall, the group's attitude toward animal research was more positive than negative. However, these negative attitudes do not appear to be rigidly held. These findings should be considered in the future of medical education curriculum development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32059752      PMCID: PMC7073395          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  6 in total

1.  The animal research controversy: exploring student attitudes.

Authors:  Gail Richmond; Manfred Engelmann; Lawrence R Krupka
Journal:  Am Biol Teach       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.342

2.  Using anonymized reflection to teach ethics: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gaye Kyle
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.874

3.  Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation.

Authors:  A C Molewijk; T Abma; M Stolper; G Widdershoven
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Animal rights terrorists: what every neuroscientist should know.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Kordower
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Animal extremists' threats to neurologic research continue: Neuroreality II.

Authors:  David Q Beversdorf; Raymond P Roos; W Allen Hauser; Vanda A Lennon; Mark F Mehler
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Neuroreality I. Dedicated demolition of the Decade of the Brain: the genuine threat to neurologic research from the animal radical right. The American Academy of Neurology Animal Studies Subcommittee.

Authors:  W M Landau; J R Daube; M J Aminoff; R L Brey; B R Brooks; R K Deuel; A M Galaburda; J A Porter; R B Rosenbaum; R H Whitham
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.910

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.