M Abdulhadi Alagha1,2, Judit Vágó1, Éva Katona1, Roland Takács1, Daan van der Veen3, Róza Zákány1, Csaba Matta1. 1. Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hajdu-Bihar, Hungary. 2. MSK Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. 3. Chronobiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Circadian rhythms in cartilage homeostasis are hypothesized to temporally segregate and synchronize the activities of chondrocytes to different times of the day, and thus may provide an efficient mechanism by which articular cartilage can recover following physical activity. While the circadian clock is clearly involved in chondrocyte homeostasis in health and disease, it is unclear as to what roles it may play during early chondrogenesis. DESIGN: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the rhythmic expression of the core circadian clock was detectable at the earliest stages of chondrocyte differentiation, and if so, whether a synchronized expression pattern of chondrogenic transcription factors and developing cartilage matrix constituents was present during cartilage formation. RESULTS: Following serum shock, embryonic limb bud-derived chondrifying micromass cultures exhibited synchronized temporal expression patterns of core clock genes involved in the molecular circadian clock. We also observed that chondrogenic marker genes followed a circadian oscillatory pattern. Clock synchronization significantly enhanced cartilage matrix production and elevated SOX9, ACAN, and COL2A1 gene expression. The observed chondrogenesis-promoting effect of the serum shock was likely attributable to its synchronizing effect on the molecular clockwork, as co-application of small molecule modulators (longdaysin and KL001) abolished the stimulating effects on extracellular matrix production and chondrogenic marker gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that a functional molecular clockwork plays a positive role in tissue homeostasis and histogenesis during early chondrogenesis.
OBJECTIVE: Circadian rhythms in cartilage homeostasis are hypothesized to temporally segregate and synchronize the activities of chondrocytes to different times of the day, and thus may provide an efficient mechanism by which articular cartilage can recover following physical activity. While the circadian clock is clearly involved in chondrocyte homeostasis in health and disease, it is unclear as to what roles it may play during early chondrogenesis. DESIGN: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the rhythmic expression of the core circadian clock was detectable at the earliest stages of chondrocyte differentiation, and if so, whether a synchronized expression pattern of chondrogenic transcription factors and developing cartilage matrix constituents was present during cartilage formation. RESULTS: Following serum shock, embryonic limb bud-derived chondrifying micromass cultures exhibited synchronized temporal expression patterns of core clock genes involved in the molecular circadian clock. We also observed that chondrogenic marker genes followed a circadian oscillatory pattern. Clock synchronization significantly enhanced cartilage matrix production and elevated SOX9, ACAN, and COL2A1 gene expression. The observed chondrogenesis-promoting effect of the serum shock was likely attributable to its synchronizing effect on the molecular clockwork, as co-application of small molecule modulators (longdaysin and KL001) abolished the stimulating effects on extracellular matrix production and chondrogenic marker gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that a functional molecular clockwork plays a positive role in tissue homeostasis and histogenesis during early chondrogenesis.
Authors: Elaine Vieira; Laura Marroquí; Thiago M Batista; Ernesto Caballero-Garrido; Everardo M Carneiro; Antonio C Boschero; Angel Nadal; Ivan Quesada Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Sarah J B Snelling; Alana Forster; Supratim Mukherjee; Andrew J Price; Raewyn C Poulsen Journal: Chronobiol Int Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Biliana Marcheva; Kathryn Moynihan Ramsey; Ethan D Buhr; Yumiko Kobayashi; Hong Su; Caroline H Ko; Ganka Ivanova; Chiaki Omura; Shelley Mo; Martha H Vitaterna; James P Lopez; Louis H Philipson; Christopher A Bradfield; Seth D Crosby; Lellean JeBailey; Xiaozhong Wang; Joseph S Takahashi; Joseph Bass Journal: Nature Date: 2010-07-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tsuyoshi Hirota; Jae Wook Lee; Peter C St John; Mariko Sawa; Keiko Iwaisako; Takako Noguchi; Pagkapol Y Pongsawakul; Tim Sonntag; David K Welsh; David A Brenner; Francis J Doyle; Peter G Schultz; Steve A Kay Journal: Science Date: 2012-07-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Mark A Naven; Leo A H Zeef; Shiyang Li; Paul A Humphreys; Christopher A Smith; Dharshika Pathiranage; Stuart Cain; Steven Woods; Nicola Bates; Manting Au; Chunyi Wen; Susan J Kimber; Qing-Jun Meng Journal: Theranostics Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 11.600
Authors: Judit Vágó; Katalin Kiss; Edina Karanyicz; Roland Takács; Csaba Matta; László Ducza; Tibor A Rauch; Róza Zákány Journal: Cells Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 6.600