| Literature DB >> 32059376 |
Muhammad Zulfiqar1, San Yi Lee1, Amira Azreena Mafize1, Nur Adlin Mastura Abdul Kahar1, Khairiraihanna Johari1, Nurul Ekmi Rabat1.
Abstract
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel are still restricted for some applications because their lower mechanical strength and thermal stability. The PVA-based composites are drawing attention for the removal of heavy metals based on their specific functionality in adsorption process. The main objective of this work is to synthesize oil palm bio-waste (OPB)/multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) reinforced PVA hydrogels in the presence of N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide (NMBA) as a crosslinking agent and ammonium persulfate (APS) as an initiator via simple in-situ polymerization technique. The as-prepared reinforced nanocomposites were characterized by FESEM, BET surface area, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), TGA and FTIR analysis. The possible influence of OPB and MWCNTs on the tensile strength, elongation at break and elastic modulus of the samples were investigated. It was found that reinforced nanocomposites exhibited enhanced mechanical properties as compared to non-reinforced material. The evaluation of reinforced nanocomposites was tested by the removal of Pb(II) aqueous solutions in a batch adsorption system. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model was used to illustrate the adsorption kinetic results and Langmuir isotherm was more suitable to fit the equilibrium results providing maximum adsorption capacities. The evaluation of thermodynamic parameters describes the spontaneous, endothermic and chemisorption adsorption process while activation energy reveals the physical adsorption mechanism. Therefore, the coordination effects among OPB, MWCNTs and PVA polymer hydrogels can produce a promising adsorbent material for wastewater treatment applications.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; hydrogel; mechanism; multiwalled carbon nanotubes; oil palm empty fruit bunch; polyvinyl alcohol
Year: 2020 PMID: 32059376 PMCID: PMC7077652 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Different types of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogel loaded composites as adsorbents used for the adsorption of Pb(II).
| Hydrogel Composite | Solutions | Adsorption Capacity | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chitosan/PVA beads | Chitosan/PVA mixed ratio = 75:25–25:75, glutaraldehyde = 5% ( | 9.48 mg/g | [ |
| Chitosan/PVA blend nanofiber membrane | Chitosan, distilled water, PVA, acetic acid = 2% (wt %) | 266.12 mg/g | [ |
| Cellulose/chitosan/PVA nanofibrous films | Microcrystalline cellulose = 40 g, water = 4.7 g, H2SO4 (98 wt %) = 65.3 g, chitosan:acetic acid = 90:10 (vol %), chitosan:PVA = 60:40 (vol %) | 323.49 mg/g | [ |
| Chitosan/PVA beads | Chitosan flaks = 4.26 g, dilute acetic acid = 2% ( | - | [ |
| Chitosan/PVA thin membrane | Chitosan powder, acetic acid = 1% ( | 121.3 mg/g | [ |
| Chitosan/PVA talc composite | PVA = 8 wt %, Chitosan = 7 wt %, distilled water, chitosan:acetic acid (concentrated) = 50:50, talc = 1 wt % | 88% | [ |
| Chitosan/PVA | PVA = appropriate amount, sodium alginate = 1.3 g, CaCO3 powder, distilled water = 150 mL, chitosan = certain amount, CaCl2-saturated boric acid sol. = 3% | 166.44 mg/g | [ |
| Chitosan/MWCNTs/PVA hydrogel membrane | Chitosan sol. = 2 wt %, acetic acid sol. = 2 wt %, PVA sol. = 2 wt % | - | [ |
| Xanthate-modified with Fe3O4-based chitosan/PVA hydrogel | Chitosan = 6 g, aqueous acetic acid = 150 mL (2% | 97.8% | [ |
| Fe3O4/PVA/spent coffee ground | Spent coffee ground = 100 mesh screen, FeCl3/Na2SO3 = mixed sol., Fe3O4 particles, PVA sol. = 2 wt % ( | 0.275 mmol/g | [ |
| Chitosan oligosaccharide-g-maleic | Silk fibroin = 0.25 g, 0.5 wt % Na2CO3, ceric ammonium nitrate = 0.5 g, 1 N HNO3 = 10 mL, PVA = 1 mL, chitosan oligosaccharide = 5 g, cocoons, maleic anhydride = 2.5 g, distilled water = 30 mL | 16.412 mg/g | [ |
| PVA/α-manganese dioxide composite | MnSO4.H2O = 200 mg, KMnO4 = 500 mg, deionized water = 10 mL, ethanol = 9 mL, PVA = 300 mg, H2SO4 = 1 mL | 88.7% | [ |
| Graphene oxide/PVA nano-composite hydrogel | Graphene oxide = 0.5 g, deionized water = 100 mL, ethylenediamine-triacetic acid sodium = appropriate amount | 67% | [ |
| PVA/MWCNTs | MWCNTs = 0.2 g, PVA solution = 500 mL, glutaraldehyde = 10 mL (2.5 %), HCl = 1% | 86% | [ |
| PVA/graphene oxide-sodium alginate nanocomposite hydrogel | Graphene oxide = 1–5 g, deionized water = 100 mL, sodium alginate = 5 g, PVA = 1–5 g, mixed solution of boric acid and CaCl2 | 279.43 mg/g | [ |
| Algal-based sorbent | Polyethyleneimine (PEI) = 6 g, water = 200 mL, glutaraldehyde (50% | 1.09 mmol/g | [ |
| Torrefied biomass | CENTORRE oven = i.d: ϕ 1.82 m, hearth height: 0.74 m including rotatory axis i.d: ϕ 0.42 m, flow rate of biomass ≥ 12 kg/hr, torrefaction conditions = 250 and 280 °C for 75 and 60 min, respectively | 30.0 mg/g | [ |
| Oil palm bio-waste/MWCNTs/PVA composite hydrogel | PVA = 26 g, distilled water = 200 mL, OPB = 5–20 wt %, MWCNTs = 1–4 wt %, NMBA = 0.08 g, APS = 1.25 g, washed with acetone | 30.031 mg/g | This study |
Figure 1FESEM images of: (a) PVA hydrogel, (b) oil palm bio-waste (OPB)/PVA hydrogel, (c) multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)/PVA hydrogel and (d) OPB/PVA/MWCNTs and (e) high resolution of OPB/MWCNTs hydrogel, respectively.
Pore characteristics of hydrogels.
| Hydrogels | Accessible Porosity (%) | Total Surface Area (m2/g) | Pore Diameter (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVA | 0.07 | 12.49 | 8.45 |
| MWCNTs/PVA | 2.816 | 31.11 | |
| 5 wt % OPB/4 wt % MWCNTs/PVA | 2.861 | 31.54 | |
| 15 wt % OPB/4 wt % MWCNTs/PVA | 2.352 | 39.75 | |
| 30 wt % OPB/4 wt % MWCNTs/PVA | 7.53 | 3.382 | 110.98 |
Figure 2TGA curves of non-reinforced and OPB/MWCNTs reinforced PVA hydrogels.
Figure 3Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of non-reinforced PVA and OPB/MWCNTs reinforced PVA hydrogels.
Figure 4FTIR analysis of PVA, OPB/PVA, OPB/PVA/MWCNTs and OPB/MWCNTs hydrogels, respectively.
Figure 5Compressive strength of all water swollen hydrogels at different amount of MWCNTs. Experimental conditions: cross-sectional area of samples = 20 mm2, at room temperature.
Figure 6Elongation at break and tensile strength of non-reinforced and PVA hydrogels with 4 wt % MWCNTs at different amount of OPB. Experimental conditions: crosshead speed testing = 10 mm/min, ASTM D638 at room temperature.
Figure 7Pb(II) ions removal of non-reinforced and PVA hydrogels with 4 wt % MWCNTs at different amount of OPB. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose = 0.5 g, Pb(II) concentration = 65 mg/L, pH = 7 and maximum adsorption time = 300 min (1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min) at room temperature.
Figure 8Effect of pH for the adsorption of Pb(II) onto the PVA, OPB/PVA and OPB/PVA/MWCNTs hydrogel adsorbents. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose = 0.5 g, Pb(II) concentration = 65 mg/L and maximum adsorption time = 300 min (1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min) at room temperature.
Figure 9Effect of contact time for the adsorption of Pb(II) onto the PVA, OPB/PVA and OPB/PVA/MWCNTs hydrogel adsorbents. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose = 0.5 g, Pb(II) concentration = 65 mg/L and pH = 7 at room temperature.
Figure 10Effect of initial concentrations (65, 150 and 200 mg/L) for the adsorption of Pb(II) onto the PVA, OPB/PVA and OPB/PVA/MWCNTs hydrogel adsorbents. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose = 0.5 g and pH = 7 and maximum adsorption time = 300 min (1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min) at room temperature.
Figure 11Pseudo-first-order kinetic model of Pb(II) onto the (a) PVA, (b) OPB/PVA and (c) OPB-PVA/MWCNTs while pseudo-second-order kinetic model of Pb(II) onto the (d) PVA, (e) OPB/PVA and (f) OPB-PVA/MWCNTs, respectively at various concentrations (65, 150 and 200 ppm). Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose = 0.5 g, pH = 7 and maximum adsorption time = 300 min (1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min) at room temperature.
Adsorption kinetic parameters obtained from pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models using PVA, OPB/PVA and OPB/PVA/MWCNTs adsorbents.
| Adsorbents | Experimental | PFO Kinetic Model | PSO Kinetic Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conc. (ppm) |
|
| ||||||
| PVA | 65 | 11.121 | 11.714 | −1.401 | 0.974 | 11.401 | 6.981 | 0.898 |
| 150 | 33.175 | 34.969 | −2.511 | 0.922 | 33.101 | 4.012 | 0.868 | |
| 200 | 41.221 | 41.554 | −2.812 | 0.928 | 41.011 | 7.161 | 0.964 | |
| OPB/PVA | 65 | 1.626 | 1.091 | −10.821 | 0.942 | 1.591 | 1252.5 | 0.991 |
| 150 | 32.938 | 32.616 | −5.182 | 0.928 | 32.735 | 1.441 | 0.989 | |
| 200 | 78.912 | 73.886 | −3.591 | 0.977 | 78.627 | 1.372 | 0.996 | |
| OPB/PVA/MWCNTs | 65 | 1.672 | 1.778 | −13.587 | 0.951 | 1.763 | 45.101 | 0.998 |
| 150 | 15.817 | 14.067 | −9.991 | 0.957 | 15.542 | 7.641 | 0.962 | |
| 200 | 35.148 | 25.763 | −8.752 | 0.916 | 35.214 | 3.572 | 0.942 | |
Figure 12(a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich and (c) Temkin isotherm models for PVA, OPB/PVA and OPB/PVA/MWCNTs adsorbents for Pb(II) removal at various concentrations (65–200 ppm) and pH 7. Experimental conditions: adsorbent dose = 0.5 g, pH = 7 and maximum adsorption time = 300 min (1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min) at room temperature.
Isotherm parameters used for the Pb(II) removal over the PVA, OPB/PVA and OPB/PVA/MWCNTs adsorbents.
| Isotherms | Parameters | PVA | OPB/PVA | OPB/PVA/MWCNTs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langmuir | 18.329 | 13.021 | 30.031 | |
| 3.534 | 0.791 | 0.779 | ||
|
| 0.973 | 0.968 | 0.989 | |
| Freundlich | −0.449 | 1.263 | 1.013 | |
|
| 1.141 | 5.772 | 4.291 | |
|
| 0.966 | 0.922 | 0.987 | |
| Temkin | 0.539 | 1.451 | 1.876 | |
|
| 53.476 | 7.514 | 7.821 | |
|
| 0.944 | 0.925 | 0.915 |
Figure 13Effect of Pb(II) aqueous solution temperature for maximum adsorption of Pb(II) onto the OPB/PVA/MWCNTs hydrogel.
Figure 14The calculation of adsorption thermodynamic parameters and activation energy by plotting 1/T·(1/K) versus log Kd.
Thermodynamic parameters and activation energy for adsorption of Pb(II) onto the OPB/PVA/MWCNTs hydrogel.
| Δ | Δ | Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 298 | −16.461 | 28.904 | 55.193 | 12.551 |
| 308 | −17.012 | |||
| 318 | −17.563 |
Activation energies obtained for the adsorption of Pb(II) using different type of adsorbents.
| Type of Adsorbents | Temperature Range (K) | Activation Energy (kJ/mol) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activated carbon | 305–315 | 35.528 | [ |
| Bael leaves | 303–323 | 22.20 | [ |
| PVA-based nanofiber membrane | 298–318 | 20.29 | [ |
| Native bentonite | 303–328 | 16.51 | [ |
| Activated bentonite | 303–328 | 15.62 | [ |
| MWCNTs/silica nanocomposite | 295–335 | 15.80 | [ |
| Spent grain | 288–318 | 12.33 | [ |
| Manganese oxide coated zeolite | 288–328 | 11.90 | [ |
| Spent coffee ground | 288–328 | 11.84 | [ |
| Unmodified kaolinite clay | 298–323 | 11.90, 19.0, 5.12 | [ |
| Phosphate modified kaolinite clay | 298–323 | 5.64, 10.68, 4.32 | [ |
|
| 283–333 | 5.054 | [ |
| OPB/PVA/MWCNTs hydrogel | 298–318 | 12.551 | Present study |
Figure 15The proposed adsorption mechanism of Pb(II) onto the OPB/MWCNTs reinforced PVA hydrogel composite.
Figure 16Regeneration of OPB/MWCNTs reinforced PVA hydrogel composite for the adsorption efficiency of Pb(II) at room temperature.