Literature DB >> 32059102

Medical utilization surrounding initial opioid-related diagnoses by coding method.

Amber Watson1, David M Simon, Meridith Blevins Peratikos, Elizabeth Ann Stringer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify methods for coding initial opioid-related disorder (ORD) diagnoses in administrative claims and determine whether coding methods correspond to acute medical utilization patterns. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Blue Health Intelligence commercial data.
METHODS: We included members with 2 years of continuous coverage around the first appearance of an ORD diagnosis code (initial ORD) in medical or pharmacy claims with dates of service between October 2015 and March 2016. Initial ORD was identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) F11 codes or buprenorphine for medication-assisted treatment (BUP-MAT) with a duration of 3 or more days. Descriptive analyses were evaluated prediagnosis, in the month of diagnosis, and post diagnosis and included mean cost per member per month (PMPM); mean monthly percentage of members with at least 1 opioid agonist prescription (OAP), inpatient visit, or emergency department (ED) visit; and percentage of members with at least 1 ICD-10-CM Z79.891 code (long-term [current] use of opiate analgesic).
RESULTS: A total of 6426 initial ORD diagnoses were identified by F11.20 (65.2%), F11.x (28.7%), and BUP-MAT (6.1%). PMPM costs for BUP-MAT ($2054) were lower than for F11.20 ($5053) and F11.x ($6597) in the diagnosis month. Mean monthly percentage of members with at least 1 OAP declined from pre- to post initial ORD diagnosis (F11.20, 52.5% to 50.0%; F11.x, 44.1% to 37.9%; BUP-MAT, 34.0% to 12.7%). Members with initial ORD coded as F11.x had the highest mean percentage with at least 1 inpatient or ED visit in the diagnosis month (30.9% and 26.8%, respectively) versus F11.20 (19.3% and 10.8%) and BUP-MAT (5.1% and 3.5%). Percentage of members with at least 1 Z79.891 code was higher post diagnosis than in the month of diagnosis (F11.20, 34.6% vs 25.7%; F11.x, 16.5% vs 8.1%; BUP-MAT, 19.5% vs 8.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Medical utilization patterns of members with ORD differ by the coding method used to document their initial diagnosis in administrative claims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32059102     DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  2 in total

1.  Naloxone Co-Dispensing with Opioids: a Cluster Randomized Pragmatic Trial.

Authors:  Ingrid A Binswanger; Deborah Rinehart; Shane R Mueller; Komal J Narwaney; Melanie Stowell; Nicole Wagner; Stan Xu; Rebecca Hanratty; Josh Blum; Kevin McVaney; Jason M Glanz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 6.473

2.  Identifying individuals with opioid use disorder: Validity of International Classification of Diseases diagnostic codes for opioid use, dependence and abuse.

Authors:  Pooja Lagisetty; Claire Garpestad; Angela Larkin; Colin Macleod; Derek Antoku; Stephanie Slat; Jennifer Thomas; Victoria Powell; Amy S B Bohnert; Lewei A Lin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 4.492

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.