Literature DB >> 32058113

Diagnosis of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Malfunction: A Practical Algorithm.

Morgan Broggi1, Costanza M Zattra2, Marco Schiariti2, Francesco Acerbi2, Giovanni Tringali2, Jacopo Falco2, Laura G Valentini2, Giuseppe Faragò3, Paolo Ferroli2, Giovanni Broggi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to present a practical method to accurately diagnose ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) malfunction and to detect the exact level at which the system has failed to tailor VPS revision at that level only.
METHODS: A tertiary referral single-center algorithm for diagnosis of VPS malfunction is proposed. Based on clinical symptoms and confirmed ventricular dilatation on computed tomography, the VPS reservoir is punctured; if no cerebrospinal fluid is obtained, ventricular catheter replacement is recommended. Conversely, if cerebrospinal fluid is obtained, a sample is sent for cultural examination and the macroscopic integrity of the whole system is checked via plain radiography in the angiographic suite. Then, through the injection of iodate contrast medium into the reservoir and selective exclusion of the proximal and distal catheters, the patency and correct VPS functioning are investigated.
RESULTS: A total of 102 (56 males) patients (mean age, 41.5 years; range, 1-86 years) underwent a VPS function test from 2012 to 2018: 59 cases of VPS malfunction (57.8%) were diagnosed. Ventricular catheter obstruction/damage/displacement occurred in 12/59 patients (20.3%), valve damage in 11/59 patients (18.6%), distal catheter obstruction/damage/displacement in 17/59 patients (28.8%) and 2-level (valve/proximal catheter or valve/distal catheter) obstruction/damage/displacement in 16/59 patients (27.1%). Subclinical infection was diagnosed in 3 patients (5.1%). VPS revision was performed selectively at the level of failure.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm is a practical, simple and minimally invasive technique to accurately diagnose VPS malfunction, identifying the exact level of system failure and allowing surgical VPS revision to be tailored, avoiding unnecessary complete system replacement.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF shunt; Hydrocephalus; Shunt malfunction; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt revision

Year:  2020        PMID: 32058113     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  5 in total

1.  Subduro-peritoneal shunts in the management of subdural collection related to ruptured intracranial arachnoid cysts.

Authors:  Marco Ceraudo; Alessandro Prior
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction diagnosis based on substance dilution.

Authors:  Xinjie Fu; Yuhang Chen; Weike Duan; Haixin Yang; Jiulin Xu; Xiaobing Cheng; Hongri Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Subdural fluid accumulation caused by ventriculoperitoneal shunt underdrainage: A rare and paradoxical complication.

Authors:  Ruth Prieto; Matias Cea Soriano; Celia Ortega; Teresa Kalantari; Alberto Pueyo Rabanal
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-12-22

4.  Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Failure Due to Distal Peritoneal Catheter Kinking.

Authors:  Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar; Arka N Mallela; Hanna N Algattas; Rachel Rogers; Robert M Friedlander
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-05

5.  Shunt Valve Rupture in Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Failure.

Authors:  Mustafa Güdük; Ahmet Akbaş; Mürüvvet Ayten Tüzünalp; Gürkan Berikol; Murat Şakir Ekşi
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.104

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.