Literature DB >> 32057939

Lateralization in the dichotic listening of tones is influenced by the content of speech.

Ning Mei1, Adeen Flinker2, Miaomiao Zhu3, Qing Cai4, Xing Tian5.   

Abstract

Cognitive functions, for example speech processing, are distributed asymmetrically in the two hemispheres that mostly have homologous anatomical structures. Dichotic listening is a well-established paradigm to investigate hemispherical lateralization of speech. However, the mixed results of dichotic listening, especially when using tonal languages as stimuli, complicates the investigation of functional lateralization. We hypothesized that the inconsistent results in dichotic listening are due to an interaction in processing a mixture of acoustic and linguistic attributes that are differentially processed over the two hemispheres. In this study, a within-subject dichotic listening paradigm was designed, in which different levels of speech and linguistic information was incrementally included in different conditions that required the same tone identification task. A left ear advantage (LEA), in contrast with the commonly found right ear advantage (REA) in dichotic listening, was observed in the hummed tones condition, where only the slow frequency modulation of tones was included. However, when phonemic and lexical information was added in simple vowel tone conditions, the LEA became unstable. Furthermore, ear preference became balanced when phonological and lexical-semantic attributes were included in the consonant-vowel (CV), pseudo-word, and word conditions. Compared with the existing REA results that use complex vowel word tones, a complete pattern emerged gradually shifting from LEA to REA. These results support the hypothesis that an acoustic analysis of suprasegmental information of tones is preferably processed in the right hemisphere, but is influenced by phonological and lexical semantic processes residing in the left hemisphere. The ear preference in dichotic listening depends on the levels of speech and linguistic analysis and preferentially lateralizes across the different hemispheres. That is, the manifestation of functional lateralization depends on the integration of information across the two hemispheres.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32057939     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  6 in total

1.  A modality selective effect of functional laterality in pain detection sensitivity.

Authors:  Huijuan Zhang; Xuejing Lu; Yanzhi Bi; Li Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The effects of alphabetic literacy, linguistic-processing demand and tone type on the dichotic listening of lexical tones.

Authors:  Jing Shao; Caicai Zhang; Gaoyuan Zhang; Yubin Zhang; Chotiga Pattamadilok
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  Neurophysiological Evaluation of Right-Ear Advantage During Dichotic Listening.

Authors:  Keita Tanaka; Bernhard Ross; Shinya Kuriki; Tsuneo Harashima; Chie Obuchi; Hidehiko Okamoto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-08

4.  Dichotic Perception of Lexical Tones in Cantonese-Speaking Congenital Amusics.

Authors:  Jing Shao; Caicai Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-07

5.  fNIRS Assessment of Speech Comprehension in Children with Normal Hearing and Children with Hearing Aids in Virtual Acoustic Environments: Pilot Data and Practical Recommendations.

Authors:  Laura Bell; Z Ellen Peng; Florian Pausch; Vanessa Reindl; Christiane Neuschaefer-Rube; Janina Fels; Kerstin Konrad
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-07

6.  Mental operations in rhythm: Motor-to-sensory transformation mediates imagined singing.

Authors:  Yanzhu Li; Huan Luo; Xing Tian
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.