| Literature DB >> 32057822 |
Cheryl M McCormick1, Justin M Carré2.
Abstract
Swift-Gallant et al. (2020) provide a thought-provoking perspective on the topic of digit ratio research, research that has had some prominence in the journal Hormones and Behavior, and is research that has garnered much controversy. In this commentary on their paper, we add to the discussion of why there is skepticism of the use of digit ratios as a measure of individual differences in prenatal androgens, we comment on the mis-use of the facial width-to-height ratio as a measure of individual differences in testosterone, the grey areas in the interpretation of evidence, and we address the concern raised in their article regarding editorial policies at Hormones and Behavior (spoiler alert: there are no secret policies).Entities:
Keywords: 2D:4D; Digit ratio; Facial width-to-height ratio
Year: 2020 PMID: 32057822 DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2020.104710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Horm Behav ISSN: 0018-506X Impact factor: 3.587