Literature DB >> 32057565

Virus disinfection for biotechnology applications: Different effectiveness on surface versus in suspension.

Johanna Kindermann1, Michael Karbiener2, Sandra M Leydold3, Simone Knotzer4, Jens Modrof5, Thomas R Kreil6.   

Abstract

Virus contamination events in cell culture-based biotechnology processes have occurred and have had a dramatic impact on the supply of life-saving drugs, and thus on the wellbeing of patients. Cleanup requires effective and robust virucidal decontamination procedures for both the liquid reactor content before discharge, as well as facility surfaces to prevent recurrence. Beyond rare contamination events, it is important to implement virucidal disinfection for change-over procedures as effective preventive measure in routine biomanufacturing. Knowledge of the virus inactivation capacity of commonly used disinfectants is therefore important. However, available virus inactivation data often refer to studies performed in suspension only, and not, as often more relevant, to virus inactivation on surfaces. In this study three liquid disinfectants, based on sodium hypochlorite, glutaraldehyde, or hydrogen peroxide/peroxyacetic acid, as well as one gaseous hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectant were investigated for inactivation of lipid enveloped and non-lipid enveloped model viruses, using suspension (for the liquid disinfectants) and carrier assay designs for their virucidal efficacy on surface. The results of these side-by-side investigations demonstrate that depending on the type of application, i.e. routine surface disinfection or decontamination of e.g. a contaminated bioreactor content, the most effective choice of disinfectant may be remarkably different.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biotherapeutics; Glutaraldehyde; Hydrogen peroxide/ peroxyacetic acid; Plasma products; Sodium hypochlorite; Virus disinfection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32057565     DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  4 in total

Review 1.  A Critical Review of Disinfection Processes to Control SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in the Food Industry.

Authors:  Adrián Pedreira; Yeşim Taşkın; Míriam R García
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-31

2.  Efficacy of hydrogen peroxide wipes for decontamination of AZD1222 adenovirus COVID-19 vaccine strain on pharmaceutical industry materials.

Authors:  V P Rhodes; A C F B Ajorio; L V da Costa; A P Rodrigues; V A Diniz; R V da Silva Lage; I B da Silva; M L L Brandão
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Disinfection of N95 masks artificially contaminated with SARS-CoV-2 and ESKAPE bacteria using hydrogen peroxide plasma: Impact on the reutilization of disposable devices.

Authors:  Gabriela Ibáñez-Cervantes; Juan Carlos Bravata-Alcántara; Alan Steve Nájera-Cortés; Sergio Meneses-Cruz; Laura Delgado-Balbuena; Clemente Cruz-Cruz; Emilio Mariano Durán-Manuel; Monica Alethia Cureño-Díaz; Erika Gómez-Zamora; Sonia Chávez-Ocaña; Oscar Sosa-Hernández; Antonio Aguilar-Rojas; Juan Manuel Bello-López
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.918

4.  Is 0.5% hydrogen peroxide effective against SARS-CoV-2?

Authors:  Karem López Ortega; Bruna de Oliveira Rech; Andre Luiz Ferreira Costa; Mario Perez Sayans; Paulo Henrique Braz-Silva
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.068

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.