Brittany Popowich1, Xanthoula Kostaras2, Claire Temple-Oberle3. 1. Alberta Health Services, Canada. 2. Alberta Health Services, Canada; University of Calgary, Canada. 3. Alberta Health Services, Canada; University of Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: Claire.Temple-Oberle@ahs.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to illuminate differences in published clinical practice guideline recommendations for breast reconstruction after prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy. METHODS: Ten guidelines were identified through a systematic search of websites and databases of reputable oncology guideline developers, and key differences and gaps in recommendations were noted. Quality assessment of the guidelines was conducted by three reviewers using the AGREE II tool, focusing on breast reconstruction specific documents rather than the general breast cancer guidelines. RESULTS: The most comprehensive guidelines were published by Alberta Health Services, Cancer Care Ontario, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and the Association of Breast Surgery/British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. AGREE II scores in the domains of "Scope and Purpose" and "Clarity and Presentation" were ranked relatively high for all four guidelines while "Applicability" and "Editorial Independence" were ranked relatively low. The Alberta and Ontario guidelines were the overall highest ranked guidelines across all domains. CONCLUSION: Overall, these guidelines provide consistent recommendations on who should receive breast reconstruction education, who is a candidate for postmastectomy breast reconstruction, and the appropriate timing of reconstruction and extent of mastectomy. Future updates from all should focus on expanding to include alloplastic and autologous forms of reconstruction and should include a broad scope of relevant questions. Crown
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this article is to illuminate differences in published clinical practice guideline recommendations for breast reconstruction after prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy. METHODS: Ten guidelines were identified through a systematic search of websites and databases of reputable oncology guideline developers, and key differences and gaps in recommendations were noted. Quality assessment of the guidelines was conducted by three reviewers using the AGREE II tool, focusing on breast reconstruction specific documents rather than the general breast cancer guidelines. RESULTS: The most comprehensive guidelines were published by Alberta Health Services, Cancer Care Ontario, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and the Association of Breast Surgery/British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. AGREE II scores in the domains of "Scope and Purpose" and "Clarity and Presentation" were ranked relatively high for all four guidelines while "Applicability" and "Editorial Independence" were ranked relatively low. The Alberta and Ontario guidelines were the overall highest ranked guidelines across all domains. CONCLUSION: Overall, these guidelines provide consistent recommendations on who should receive breast reconstruction education, who is a candidate for postmastectomy breast reconstruction, and the appropriate timing of reconstruction and extent of mastectomy. Future updates from all should focus on expanding to include alloplastic and autologous forms of reconstruction and should include a broad scope of relevant questions. Crown
Authors: Kathryn V Isaac; Edward W Buchel; Muriel M Brackstone; Christopher Doherty; Joan E Lipa; Toni Zhong; John L Semple; Mitchell H Brown; Laura Snell; Mary-Helen Mahoney; Joshua Vorstenbosch; Margaret Wheelock; Sheina A Macadam; Christopher J Coroneos; Marie-Pascale Tremblay-Champagne; Sophocles H Voineskos; Jing Zhang; Ron Somogyi; Claire Temple-Oberle; Douglas Ross Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-02-28