Literature DB >> 32057016

Management of severe Acanthamoeba keratitis and complicated cataract following laser in situ keratomileusis.

N V Annapurna1, Bhupesh Bagga1, Prashant Garg1, Joveeta Joseph2, Savitri Sharma3, Paavan Kalra1, Ruchi Mittal1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32057016      PMCID: PMC7043180          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_492_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
According to previous studies, the incidence of postoperative laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) infections are rare, as such 1 in 2919 cases have been reported with Mycobacteria and Staphylococci[123] being the most common organisms implicated. In the present study, we are reporting a challenging case of Acanthamoeba keratitis, a rare infection following LASIK, managed medically as well as surgically with flap amputation. On subsequent follow-up, the development of complicated cataract was observed which was well-managed, leading to good anatomical and functional outcome. A 24-year-old lady, who underwent microkeratome-assisted LASIK elsewhere, 3 months ago for myopia (-4DS), presented with a painful decrease of vision in the left eye. At presentation, the visual acuity was counting fingers close to face, while on examination, cornea [Fig. 1a] showed diffuse anterior to mid-stromal infiltrate with overlying necrotic flap. On microbiological examination, smears made from the stromal bed after lifting and later amputating the unsalvageable flap, revealed Acanthamoeba cysts [Figs. 2 and 3]. Postoperatively, [Fig. 1b] both topical 0.02% polyhexamethylene biguanide with 0.02% chlorhexidine were started hourly. After observing the signs of resolving infection with deep vessels [Fig. 1c], topical 1% prednisolone acetate was added every 3 hours along with gradual tapering of biguanides and steroids. Keratitis was completely resolved in 6 months leading to scar (CCT-392μ) and regression of vessels [Fig. 1d]. Complicated cataract observed during follow up was managed with intraocular lens implantation as calculated with SRK-T formula, resulting into visual acuity of 20/20 (p) with +2.0/-2.5@180.
Figure 1

(a) At the presentation to our institute with diffuse stromal infiltration (8.2 mm vertically and 6.4 mm horizontally) (b) After the flap amputation (c) After 1 month of treatment, when steroids were added since deep vessels were noticed (d) Final follow-up after cataract surgery

Figure 2

Gram stain (a) of the corneal scraping showing hexagonal double-walled cyst of Acanthamoeba (100×) and 10% KOH + 1% CFW STAIN (b) of the corneal scraping showing multiple fluorescent Acanthamoeba cysts (40×)

Figure 3

Excised LASIK flap shows double-walled cysts of Acanthamoeba (H and E stain (a), GMS (b); 40×)

(a) At the presentation to our institute with diffuse stromal infiltration (8.2 mm vertically and 6.4 mm horizontally) (b) After the flap amputation (c) After 1 month of treatment, when steroids were added since deep vessels were noticed (d) Final follow-up after cataract surgery Gram stain (a) of the corneal scraping showing hexagonal double-walled cyst of Acanthamoeba (100×) and 10% KOH + 1% CFW STAIN (b) of the corneal scraping showing multiple fluorescent Acanthamoeba cysts (40×) Excised LASIK flap shows double-walled cysts of Acanthamoeba (H and E stain (a), GMS (b); 40×)

Discussion

This case emphasizes the importance of precise microbiological diagnosis and need of long-term treatment (average 3–4 months) along with timely tapering of medications to avoid toxicity and judicious use of topical steroids in post-Lasik Acanthamoeba keratitis. Flap amputation may be considered therapeutic as reported in the literature.[4] Although visual acuity improved in our case study, use of ASCRS calculator[5] for IOL power, would have enhanced better uncorrected visual acuity.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Microbial keratitis after corneal laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  Daya Papalkar Sharma; Shanel Sharma; Mark R Wilkins
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.165

2.  Microbial keratitis after LASIK.

Authors:  Prashant Garg; Sunita Chaurasia; Pravin K Vaddavalli; R Muralidhar; Vikas Mittal; Usha Gopinathan
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods after myopic laser refractive surgery without previous refractive surgery data.

Authors:  Ruibo Yang; Annie Yeh; Michael R George; Maria Rahman; Helen Boerman; Ming Wang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Infectious keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis: results of an ASCRS survey.

Authors:  Renée Solomon; Eric D Donnenfeld; Dimitri T Azar; Edward J Holland; F Rick Palmon; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Jonathan B Rubenstein
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Early post-LASIK flap amputation in the treatment of aggressive, branching keratitis: a case report.

Authors:  John Au; Thomas Plesec; Karolinne Rocha; William Dupps; Ronald Krueger
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.