Tiffany-Heather Ulep1, Ryan Zenhausern1, Alana Gonzales1, David S Knoff1, Paula A Lengerke Diaz2, Januario E Castro2, Jeong-Yeol Yoon3. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States. 2. Hematology Oncology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, United States. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, United States. Electronic address: jyyoon@email.arizona.edu.
Abstract
Diagnosis of hematological cancer requires complete white blood cell count, followed by flow cytometry with multiple markers, and cytology. It requires substantial time and specialized training. A dual-layer paper microfluidic chip was developed as a quicker, low-cost, and field-deployable alternative to detect ROR1+ (receptor tyrosine-like orphan receptor one) cancer cells from the undiluted and untreated buffy coat blood samples. The first capture layer consisted of a GF/D glass fiber substrate, preloaded with cancer specific anti-ROR1 conjugated fluorescent particles to its center for cancer cell capture and direct smartphone fluorescence imaging. The second flow layer was comprised of a grade 1 cellulose chromatography paper with wax-printed four channels for wicking and capillary flow-based detection. The flow velocity was used as measure of antigen concentration in the buffy coat sample. In this manner, intact cells and their antigens were separated and independently analyzed by both imaging and flow velocity analyses. A custom-made smartphone-based fluorescence microscope and automated image processing and particle counter software were developed to enumerate particles on paper, with the limit of detection of 1 cell/μL. Flow velocity analysis showed even greater sensitivity, with the limit of detection of 0.1 cells/μL in the first 6 s of assay. Comparison with capillary flow model revealed great alignment with experimental data and greater correlation to viscosity than interfacial tension. Our proposed device is able to capture and on-chip image ROR1+ cancer cells within a complex sample matrix (buffy coat) while simultaneously quantifying cell concentration in a point-of-care manner.
Diagnosis of hematological cancer requires complete white blood cell count, followed by flow cytometry with n class="Gene">multiple markers, and cytology. It requires substantial time and specialized training. A dual-layer paper microfluidic chip was developed as a quicker, low-cost, and field-deployable alternative to detect ROR1+ (receptor tyrosine-like orphan receptor one) cancer cells from the undiluted and untreated buffy coat blood samples. The first capture layer consisted of a GF/D glass fiber substrate, preloaded with cancer specific anti-ROR1 conjugated fluorescent particles to its center for cancer cell capture and direct smartphone fluorescence imaging. The second flow layer was comprised of a grade 1 cellulose chromatography paper with wax-printed four channels for wicking and capillary flow-based detection. The flow velocity was used as measure of antigen concentration in the buffy coat sample. In this manner, intact cells and their antigens were separated and independently analyzed by both imaging and flow velocity analyses. A custom-made smartphone-based fluorescence microscope and automated image processing and particle counter software were developed to enumerate particles on paper, with the limit of detection of 1 cell/μL. Flow velocity analysis showed even greater sensitivity, with the limit of detection of 0.1 cells/μL in the first 6 s of assay. Comparison with capillary flow model revealed great alignment with experimental data and greater correlation to viscosity than interfacial tension. Our proposed device is able to capture and on-chip image ROR1+ cancer cells within a complex sample matrix (buffy coat) while simultaneously quantifying cell concentration in a point-of-care manner.
Authors: Lynne V Abruzzo; Lynn L Barron; Keith Anderson; Rachel J Newman; William G Wierda; Susan O'brien; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Madan Luthra; Sameer Talwalkar; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Dan Jones; Michael J Keating; Kevin R Coombes Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Xiangmeng Qu; Min Li; Hongbo Zhang; Chenglie Lin; Fei Wang; Mingshu Xiao; Yi Zhou; Jiye Shi; Ali Aldalbahi; Hao Pei; Hong Chen; Li Li Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Sabrina Uhrmacher; Christina Schmidt; Felix Erdfelder; Simon Jonas Poll-Wolbeck; Iris Gehrke; Michael Hallek; Karl-Anton Kreuzer Journal: Leuk Res Date: 2011-04-30 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: Joshua M Jackson; James B Taylor; Małgorzata A Witek; Sally A Hunsucker; Jennifer P Waugh; Yuri Fedoriw; Thomas C Shea; Steven A Soper; Paul M Armistead Journal: Analyst Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 4.616
Authors: Soo Chung; Lane E Breshears; Sean Perea; Christina M Morrison; Walter Q Betancourt; Kelly A Reynolds; Jeong-Yeol Yoon Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2019-06-27