Literature DB >> 32055928

Relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in comparison to adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Young Ho Lee1, Gwan Gyu Song2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The relative efficacy and tolerability of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib compared to adalimumab were assessed in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX).
METHODS: We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and adalimumab in RA patients with inadequate responses to MTX.
RESULTS: Four RCTs comprising 5451 patients met the inclusion criteria. Baricitinib 4 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed a significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that baricitinib 4 mg + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the ACR20 response rate, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, and placebo + MTX. Upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX showed significantly higher ACR50 and ACR70 response rates than adalimumab 40 mg + MTX. For herpes zoster infection, the ranking probability based on SUCRA indicated that placebo + MTX was likely to be the safest treatment, followed by filgotinib 200 mg + MTX, filgotinib 100 mg + MTX, adalimumab 40 mg + MTX, tofacitinib 5 mg + MTX, upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX, and baricitinib 4 mg + MTX. No statistically significant differences were found between the intervention groups in terms of safety.
CONCLUSION: In RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX, baricitinib 4 mg + MTX and upadacitinib 15 mg + MTX showed the highest ACR response rates, suggesting a difference in efficacy among the different JAK inhibitors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baricitinib; JAK inhibitors; Network meta-analysis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Tofacitinib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32055928     DOI: 10.1007/s00393-020-00750-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Rheumatol        ISSN: 0340-1855            Impact factor:   1.372


  1 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha; Iain B McInnes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Authors' Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Janet Pope; Ruta Sawant; Namita Tundia; Ella X Du; Cynthia Z Qi; Yan Song; Patrick Tang; Keith A Betts
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Peficitinib Versus Tofacitinib and Baricitinib for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yoshiya Tanaka; Hiroyuki Okumura; Soyoung Kim; Julie Dorey; Piotr Wojciechowski; Justyna Chorąży; Daisuke Kato; Neil M Schultz
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 3.  Positioning Filgotinib in the Treatment Algorithm of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Fernando Magro; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Silvio Danese
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 10.020

Review 4.  Experimental Pharmacotherapy for COVID-19: The Latest Advances.

Authors:  Pasquale Pagliano; Giuliana Scarpati; Carmine Sellitto; Valeria Conti; Anna Maria Spera; Tiziana Ascione; Ornella Piazza; Amelia Filippelli
Journal:  J Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 5.  The interplay between inflammatory pathways and COVID-19: A critical review on pathogenesis and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Shalki Choudhary; Kajal Sharma; Om Silakari
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.848

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.