A Luckscheiter1, T Lohs2, M Fischer3,4, W Zink5. 1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland. luckscha@klilu.de. 2. Stelle zur trägerübergreifenden Qualitätssicherung im Rettungsdienst Baden-Württemberg (SQR-BW), Stuttgart, Deutschland. 3. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Alb Fils Kliniken, Göppingen, Deutschland. 4. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Südwestdeutscher Notärzte e. V. (AGSWN), Filderstadt, Deutschland. 5. Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Operative Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Difficult airway management is a key skill in preclinical emergency medicine. A lower rate of subjective difficult airways and an increased success rate of endotracheal intubation have been reported for highly trained emergency physicians. The aim of this study was therefore to analyze the effect for different specialists and the individual state of training in the German emergency medical system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective register analysis of 6024 preclinical anesthesia procedures, the frequencies of airway devices, neuromuscular blocking agents, capnography and difficult airways were analyzed with respect to specialization and status of training. Additionally, low, medium and highly experienced emergency physicians in airway management were summarized by specialization and status of training according to the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition and compared. RESULTS: The incidence of subjective difficult airway situations was 10% for anesthesiological emergency physicians compared to 15-20% for other disciplines. The latter used supraglottic airway devices more often (7-9% vs. 4%) and video laryngoscopes less often (3% vs. 5%) compared to anesthesiological emergency physicians. The discipline-related state of training was inhomogeneous and revealed a reduced rate of supraglottic airway devices for internal specialists with further training (10% vs. 2%). Anesthetists specialized in intensive care medicine used capnography less frequently compared to other anesthetists (79% vs. 72%). With higher levels of experience in airway management, the frequency of endotracheal intubation (86% vs. 94%), neuromuscular blocking agents (59% vs. 73%) and video laryngoscopy (3% vs. 6%) increased and the incidence of subjective difficult airway situations (16% vs. 10%) decreased. CONCLUSION: The level of training in airway management especially for non-anesthetists is inhomogeneous. The recently published German S1 guidelines for prehospital airway management recommend education and training as well as the primary use of the video laryngoscope with Macintosh blade. The implementation could lower the incidence of subjective difficult airways.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Difficult airway management is a key skill in preclinical emergency medicine. A lower rate of subjective difficult airways and an increased success rate of endotracheal intubation have been reported for highly trained emergency physicians. The aim of this study was therefore to analyze the effect for different specialists and the individual state of training in the German emergency medical system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective register analysis of 6024 preclinical anesthesia procedures, the frequencies of airway devices, neuromuscular blocking agents, capnography and difficult airways were analyzed with respect to specialization and status of training. Additionally, low, medium and highly experienced emergency physicians in airway management were summarized by specialization and status of training according to the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition and compared. RESULTS: The incidence of subjective difficult airway situations was 10% for anesthesiological emergency physicians compared to 15-20% for other disciplines. The latter used supraglottic airway devices more often (7-9% vs. 4%) and video laryngoscopes less often (3% vs. 5%) compared to anesthesiological emergency physicians. The discipline-related state of training was inhomogeneous and revealed a reduced rate of supraglottic airway devices for internal specialists with further training (10% vs. 2%). Anesthetists specialized in intensive care medicine used capnography less frequently compared to other anesthetists (79% vs. 72%). With higher levels of experience in airway management, the frequency of endotracheal intubation (86% vs. 94%), neuromuscular blocking agents (59% vs. 73%) and video laryngoscopy (3% vs. 6%) increased and the incidence of subjective difficult airway situations (16% vs. 10%) decreased. CONCLUSION: The level of training in airway management especially for non-anesthetists is inhomogeneous. The recently published German S1 guidelines for prehospital airway management recommend education and training as well as the primary use of the video laryngoscope with Macintosh blade. The implementation could lower the incidence of subjective difficult airways.
Authors: George Kovacs; J Adam Law; John Ross; John Tallon; Kirk MacQuarrie; Dave Petrie; Sam Campbell; Chris Soder Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Arnd Timmermann; Christoph Eich; Sebastian G Russo; Ulrich Natge; Anselm Bräuer; William H Rosenblatt; Ulrich Braun Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2006-07-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Arnd Timmermann; Sebastian G Russo; Christoph Eich; Markus Roessler; Ulrich Braun; William H Rosenblatt; Micheal Quintel Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Urs Pietsch; Raphael Müllner; Lorenz Theiler; Volker Wenzel; Lorenz Meuli; Jürgen Knapp; Stephen J M Sollid; Roland Albrecht Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2022-02-08