| Literature DB >> 32055223 |
Faramin Javandel1, Mehran Nosrati1, René van den Hoven2, Alireza Seidavi1, Vito Laudadio3, Vincenzo Tufarelli3.
Abstract
The effect of different levels of hogweed powder (HP; Heracleum persicum), flavophospholipol (antibiotic), and probiotics in diet on the performance, carcass quality, blood biochemical parameters, immunity, and intestinal flora of broiler chickens was investigated. In total, 270-day-old male broilers were randomly assigned to six treatment groups as follows: control basal-diet and diet supplemented with flavophospholipol, probiotics, or 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75% HP. Birds in each group were divided into three subgroups with 15 chicks each. Results indicated that the treatment groups did not vary with respect to feed intake (FI), whereas those supplemented with the antibiotic or 0.5% HP showed significantly higher body weight gain (BWG) and improved feed conversion ratio (FCR). Carcass characteristics did not vary among treatments, with the exception of abdominal fat percentage, which was the lowest in broilers fed 0.5% and 0.75% HP. Supplementation of 0.5% and 0.75% HP decreased plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Furthermore, dietary HP significantly reduced serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) levels compared to that in the other groups. Antibody titers against Newcastle disease vaccine were not markedly affected by the treatments, whereas titers against avian influenza vaccine were significantly higher in probiotic- and 0.75% HP-supplemented groups. Antibody production against sheep red blood cells (SRBC) and IgM and IgG levels were not significantly different among groups. The ileum Lactobacillus counts in broilers fed 0.5% or 0.75% HP were significantly higher than those in the other treatment groups, whereas Escherichia coli counts in all treatments were significantly lower than that in the control. Therefore, our observations indicated that HP positively affected the gut microbiota and enhanced feed digestion. In conclusion, supplementation of 0.50-0.75% HP in broiler diet during the entire rearing period improved BWG and decreased abdominal fat deposition. 2019, Japan Poultry Science Association.Entities:
Keywords: Heracleum persicum; blood; broiler; immune system; intestinal microflora; probiotics
Year: 2019 PMID: 32055223 PMCID: PMC7005398 DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0180081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Poult Sci ISSN: 1346-7395 Impact factor: 1.425
Ingredients and nutritional composition of diets
| Ingredients (%) | 1–21 days of age | 22–42 days of age |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 56.9 | 58.7 |
| Soybean meal (43% CP) | 33.1 | 30.0 |
| Fish meal | 3.4 | 3.5 |
| Soybean oil | 2.0 | 3.5 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.55 | 1.55 |
| Oyster shell | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| DL-methionine | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Mineral premix | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Salt | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Sand | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Nutritional composition | ||
| ME (kcal/kg) | 2,910 | 3,030 |
| Crude protein (%) | 20.1 | 19.0 |
| Crude fat (%) | 4.6 | 6.14 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.95 | 0.9 |
| Total phosphorus (%) | 1.23 | 1.06 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.45 | 0/36 |
| Methionine (%) | 0.5 | 0.38 |
| Lysine (%) | 1.01 | 1.00 |
| Methionine + Cysteine (%) | 0.83 | 0.71 |
Vitamin A, 360,0000 IU; D3, 800,000 IU; vitamin E, 7,200 IU; vitamin B1, 710 mg; vitamin B2, 2,640 mg; vitamin B6, 1,176 mg; vitamin B9, 400 mg; vitamin B12, 6 mg; vitamin K3, 800 mg; pantothenicac id, 3,920 mg; biotin, 40 mg; niacin, 12,000 mg; choline chloride, 200,000 mg.
Mn, 40,000 mg; Fe, 20,000 mg; Zn, 33,900 mg; Cu, 4,000 mg; I, 400 mg, and Se, 80 mg.
Bacterial content of probiotics used
| Bacteria | CFU/g | pH |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5×107 | 5.5–7.0 | |
| 2.5×107 | 4.0–9.0 | |
| 2.5×107 | 4.0–9.0 | |
| 2.5×107 | 4.0–9.0 |
Effect of dietary treatments on cumulative feed intake (g) of broilers
| Treatments | Starter period | Finisher period | Total period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 973 | 2701 | 3675 |
| Flavophospholipol | 978 | 2690 | 3668 |
| Probiotics | 976 | 2692 | 3667 |
| 0.25% HP | 974 | 2694 | 3668 |
| 0.50% HP | 980 | 2724 | 3704 |
| 0.75% HP | 980 | 2732 | 3711 |
| SEM | 3.0 | 14.1 | 15.0 |
| P-value | 0.157 | 0.235 | 0.166 |
SEM: Standard error of means.
Effects of treatment on counts of E. coli, coliform, lactobacilli, and total aerobic bacteria in intestinal digesta of 42-day-old broilers (log CFU/g)
| Treatments | Coliform bacteria | Lactobacilli | Total aerobic bacteria | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 6.9a | 6.5 | 3.0c | 8.1 |
| Flavophospholipol | 5.3b | 8.0 | 4.5b | 8.6 |
| Probiotics | 4.3b | 7.9 | 5.5ab | 7.4 |
| 0.25% HP | 4.1b | 7.6 | 4.8ab | 7.8 |
| 0.50% HP | 4.8b | 6.3 | 5.7a | 7.4 |
| 0.75% HP | 4.8b | 7.7 | 5.8a | 8.4 |
| SEM | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.34 | 0.22 |
| P-value | 0.002 | 0.912 | 0.001 | 0.781 |
Means with different subscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05); SEM: Standard error of means.
Effect of dietary treatments on body weight (g) of broilers at the different growing stages
| Treatments | Starter period | Finisher period | Total period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 605c | 1342c | 1947c |
| Flavophospholipol | 687a | 1465a | 2152a |
| Probiotics | 671b | 1410b | 2081b |
| 0.25% HP | 609c | 1347c | 1956c |
| 0.50% HP | 681ab | 1440ab | 2122a |
| 0.75% HP | 687a | 1452a | 2139a |
| SEM | 3.0 | 11.0 | 12.0 |
| P-value | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Means with different subscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05); SEM: Standard error of means.
Effect of dietary treatments on feed conversion ratio (g feed/g gain) of broilers
| Treatments | Starter period | Finisher period | Total period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.6a | 2.0a | 1.9a |
| Flavophospholipol | 1.4c | 1.8c | 1.7c |
| Probiotics | 1.5b | 1.9b | 1.8b |
| 0.25% HP | 1.6a | 2.0a | 1.9a |
| 0.50% HP | 1.4bc | 1.9bc | 1.70c |
| 0.75% HP | 1.4c | 1.9bc | 1.7bc |
| SEM | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| P-value | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Means with different subscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05); SEM: Standard error of means.
Effect of dietary treatments on relative carcass characteristics and organ yield (%) of 42-day-old broilers
| Treatments | Carcass | Breast | Thigh | Wing | Liver | Gizzard | Abdominal fat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 74 | 28 | 26 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.18a |
| Flavophospholipol | 75 | 29 | 27 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.17b |
| Probiotics | 75 | 28 | 26 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.11c |
| 0.25% HP | 75 | 28 | 26 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.13c |
| 0.50% HP | 74 | 29 | 26 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.11d |
| 0.75% HP | 75 | 29 | 27 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.10d |
| SEM | 0.60 | 0.41 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| P-value | 0.449 | 0.814 | 0.814 | 0.407 | 0.599 | 0.270 | 0.0001 |
Means with different subscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05); SEM: Standard error of means.
Effect of dietary treatments on organ weight (g) of 42-day-old broilers
| Treatments | Pancreas | Hearth | Spleen | Thymus | Bursa Fabricius |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Flavophospholipol | 6 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| Probiotics | 4 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 0.25% HP | 4 | 13 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| 0.50% HP | 6 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 0.75% HP | 8 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| SEM | 1.2 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| P-value | 0.345 | 0.774 | 0.647 | 0.400 | 0.409 |
Effect of treatment on organ weight (g) of 42-day-old broilers
| Treatments | Proventriculus | Small intestine | Large intestine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 10 | 72 | 22 |
| Flavophospholipol | 11 | 82 | 23 |
| Probiotics | 10 | 74 | 20 |
| 0.25% HP | 9 | 81 | 23 |
| 0.50% HP | 8 | 93 | 23 |
| 0.75% HP | 9 | 89 | 27 |
| SEM | 1.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 |
| P-value | 0.685 | 0.468 | 0.481 |
SEM: Standard error of means.
Effect of treatment on serum biochemical parameters at 42 days of age
| Treatments | Total protein (g/d | Albumin (g/d | Glucose (mg/d | Cholesterol (mg/d | Triglyceride (mg/d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 4.4 | 1.7 | 207 | 155a | 70a |
| Flavophospholipol | 4.5 | 2.2 | 209 | 157a | 72a |
| Probiotics | 4.6 | 2.3 | 202 | 141ab | 57ab |
| 0.25% HP | 3.6 | 1.7 | 208 | 136ab | 51ab |
| 0.50% HP | 4.0 | 1.9 | 212 | 128b | 39a |
| 0.75% HP | 4.7 | 1.7 | 214 | 129b | 35b |
| SEM | 0.31 | 0.32 | 13.01 | 7.04 | 7.07 |
| P-value | 0.295 | 0.619 | 0.991 | 0.061 | 0.009 |
Means with different subscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05); SEM: Standard error of means.
Effect of treatment on serum biochemical parameters at 42 days of age
| Treatments | HDL | LDL | Uricacid (mg/d | Alkaline phosphatase (mg/d |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 80 | 69a | 5.4 | 1463 |
| Flavophospholipol | 82 | 69a | 4.9 | 1410 |
| Probiotics | 79 | 58ab | 3.6 | 1333 |
| 0.25% HP | 76 | 52b | 5.0 | 1096 |
| 0.50% HP | 81 | 50b | 5.9 | 1593 |
| 0.75% HP | 81 | 50b | 4.2 | 1413 |
| SEM | 5.0 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 175.0 |
| P-value | 0.963 | 0.015 | 0.521 | 0.513 |
Means with different subscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05); SEM: Standard error of means.
Effect of treatment on antibody titers against Newcastle disease virus and avian influenza virus in broilers
| Treatments | Antibody response to | Antibody response to | Antibody response to | Antibody response to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0b | 0.3b |
| Flavophospholipol | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0ab | 1.3ab |
| Probiotics | 4.7 | 2.0 | 2.0a | 1.7a |
| 0.25% HP | 3.7 | 2.0 | 1.0ab | 1.0ab |
| 0.50% HP | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0ab | 0.7ab |
| 0.75% HP | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.0a | 1.7a |
| SEM | 0.72 | 0.32 | 0.41 | 0.45 |
| P-value | 0.541 | 0.656 | 0.284 | 0.021 |
Means with different subscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05); SEM: Standard error of means.
Effect of treatment on antibody titers against SRBC, IgG, and IgM at day 28 and 42
| Treatments | SRBC | IgG | IgM | SRBC | IgG | IgM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 2.3 | 1.0b | 1.3 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| Flavophospholipol | 4.0 | 1.3a | 1.7 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.7 |
| Probiotics | 4.7 | 2.3a | 2.7 | 6.0 | 3.3 | 2.7 |
| 0.25% HP | 2.7 | 1.7a | 1.0 | 4.7 | 3.3 | 1.7 |
| 0.50% HP | 4.0 | 1.3a | 1.7 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 1.3 |
| 0.75% HP | 4.7 | 2.3a | 2.7 | 6.0 | 3.7 | 2.3 |
| SEM | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.53 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.33 |
| P-value | 0.586 | 0.024 | 0.265 | 0.531 | 0.964 | 0.194 |
Means with different subscripts in the same column differ significantly (P<0.05); SEM: Standard error of means.