| Literature DB >> 32055150 |
Xingzheng Li1, Lei Liu1, Quanlin Li1, Guiyun Xu1, Jiangxia Zheng1.
Abstract
Salmonella is the most common cause of foodborne illnesses worldwide. Poultry eggs are a major contamination source of Salmonella. The prevalence of Salmonella has been effectively reduced since a series of measures were taken to reduce contamination in egg-laying houses. In the present study, 1,512 environmental samples obtained from layer farms of different production scales were screened in a voluntary Salmonella survey study. Contaminations were detected using a PCR method. Genetic relationships among Salmonella samples were specified using molecular typing by enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC)-PCR. The survey results showed that two layer farms, located in the Shandong and Hebei provinces, were contaminated with Salmonella. Thirty-one samples from these two farms, including feed, drinking nipples, egg collection belt, air inlets and outlets, air, overshoes, and eggshells, were identified as Salmonella-positive. It was observed that certain samples within the henhouses as well as in the egg collecting areas showed relatively high genetic similarities. The survey conclusively revealed minor Salmonella contamination in northern China. Moreover, various areas within the layer farms were identified as part of the propagation chain of Salmonella. Furthermore, evidence of cross-contamination of Salmonella was found in the laying houses and egg collection areas, even between these two regions. Therefore, it is necessary to establish routine Salmonella detection and subsequent environmental control measures in order to decrease the prevalence of Salmonella. 2018 by Japan Poultry Science Association.Entities:
Keywords: ERIC-PCR; PCR; Salmonella; environment; layer farm
Year: 2017 PMID: 32055150 PMCID: PMC6756376 DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0160144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Poult Sci ISSN: 1346-7395 Impact factor: 1.425
Fig. 1.Geographical map showing the locations of the farms in four provinces in northern China where environmental samples were collected. The eight farm locations are marked with red or blue semicircles. Red semicircles represent farms that were contaminated with Salmonella, blue semicircles represent contamination-free farms. Farms are indicated with capital letters, which correspond to those in Table 2.
Information on the layer farms of different scale in the main egg production area in northern China evaluated in this study
| Province | Farm | Scale | Layer strain | Housing system | Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong | A | 30,000 | Hy-Line Brown | Semi-open | |
| B | 50,000 | Hy-Line Brown | Semi-open | ||
| Liaoning | C | 19,000 | Hy-Line Brown | Semi-open | |
| D | 60,000 | Hy-Line Brown | Battery cage | Semi open | |
| Henan | E | 40,000 | CAU-3 | Semi-open | |
| F | 250,000 | CAU-3 | Closed | ||
| Hebei | G | 4,000 | Hy-Line Sonia | Open | |
| H | 100,000 | Hy-Line Brown | Closed |
Farms were named alphabetically;
Same chicken breed was kept in each laying house
Origins of Salmonella-positive samples in contaminated layer farms
| Locations | Farm A | Farm H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contamination rate | Key | Contamination rate | Key | ||
| Feed | 1/27 (3.7%) | 1 | 0/27 | — | |
| Drinking nipples | 1/27 (3.7%) | 2 | 3/27 (11.1%) | 23–25 | |
| Egg belt | 0/27 | — | 1/27 (3.7%) | 26 | |
| Air inlets | 2/9 (22.2%) | 3, 4 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 27 | |
| Air outlets | 3/9 (33.3%) | 5–7 | 0/9 | — | |
| Air | 2/9 (22.2%) | 8, 9 | 1/9 (11.1%) | 28 | |
| Overshoes | 2/6 (33.3%) | 10, 11 | 1/6 (16.7%) | 29 | |
| Eggshells | 5/30 (16.7%) | 12–16 | 0/30 | — | |
| Air | 2/9 (22.2%) | 17, 18 | 0/9 | — | |
| Overshoe | 0/6 | — | 0/6 | — | |
| Eggshell | 4/30 (13.3%) | 19–22 | 2/30 (6.7%) | 30, 31 | |
| Total percentage | 11.6% | 4.8% | |||
Number of contaminated samples/number of detected samples for each sample type are shown, with the percentage in parentheses;
Contaminated samples were assigned unique key values.
Fig. 2.Dendrogram produced by cluster analysis of the ERIC-PCR fingerprinting data (UPGMA) of the Three major clusters (C1 to C3) of related samples were defined. Samples from farm A and farm H are marked with green and red squares, respectively. Each key refers to a unique sample and corresponds to the keys in Table 2. For each ERIC-PCR fingerprint, band sizes, sources, and locations of the samples are shown.