| Literature DB >> 32054771 |
Christopher Kassam1, Robbie Duschinsky2, Cecilia Brassett3, Stephen Barclay2.
Abstract
Anatomy education by cadaveric dissection teaches medical students not only the formal curriculum in human anatomy, but also a 'hidden curriculum' whereby they learn the attitudes, identities and behaviours expected of doctors. While dissection has been investigated as a challenge to and training in emotional regulation, little attention has been paid hitherto to the forms of medical knowledge and identity which students encounter and develop in the dissection room. This study analyses a corpus of 119 tributes written by three consecutive cohorts of first-year medical students at a university to their cadaveric donors. We employ a Foucauldian discourse analysis methodology, seeking to elucidate the features of the subject position, the narrative 'I' or 'we' of the tributes, and the modes of knowledge which operate between that subject position and its object, the donor. We observe that students find themselves in a transitional state between personal and scientific modes of knowledge of the human, which correspond to different models of the subject position occupied by the student. While in many tributes these modes exist in an uneasy disjunction, others employ creative reflection to suggest new modes of knowledge and identity which may inform ethical practice. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: medical anthropology; medical education; medical humanities; narrative medicine; philosophy of medicine/health care
Year: 2020 PMID: 32054771 DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2019-011708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Humanit ISSN: 1468-215X