Literature DB >> 32054681

Disease recovery in bats affected by white-nose syndrome.

Nathan W Fuller1, Liam P McGuire2, Evan L Pannkuk3, Todd Blute4, Catherine G Haase5, Heather W Mayberry6, Thomas S Risch7, Craig K R Willis8.   

Abstract

Processes associated with recovery of survivors are understudied components of wildlife infectious diseases. White-nose syndrome (WNS) in bats provides an opportunity to study recovery of disease survivors, understand implications of recovery for individual energetics, and assess the role of survivors in pathogen transmission. We documented temporal patterns of recovery from WNS in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) following hibernation to test the hypotheses that: (1) recovery of wing structure from WNS matches a rapid time scale (i.e. approximately 30 days) suggested by data from free-ranging bats; (2) torpor expression plays a role in recovery; (3) wing physiological function returns to normal alongside structural recovery; and (4) pathogen loads decline quickly during recovery. We collected naturally infected bats at the end of hibernation, brought them into captivity, and quantified recovery over 40 days by monitoring body mass, wing damage, thermoregulation, histopathology of wing biopsies, skin surface lipids and fungal load. Most metrics returned to normal within 30 days, although wing damage was still detectable at the end of the study. Torpor expression declined overall throughout the study, but bats expressed relatively shallow torpor bouts - with a plateau in minimum skin temperature - during intensive healing between approximately days 8 and 15. Pathogen loads were nearly undetectable after the first week of the study, but some bats were still detectably infected at day 40. Our results suggest that healing bats face a severe energetic imbalance during early recovery from direct costs of healing and reduced foraging efficiency. Management of WNS should not rely solely on actions during winter, but should also aim to support energy balance of recovering bats during spring and summer.
© 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healing; Heterothermy; Histology; Lipid profiles; Myotis lucifugus; Wildlife disease

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32054681     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.211912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

Review 1.  Ecology and impacts of white-nose syndrome on bats.

Authors:  Joseph R Hoyt; A Marm Kilpatrick; Kate E Langwig
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Evaluating bat boxes: design and placement alter bioenergetic costs and overheating risk.

Authors:  Reed D Crawford; Luke E Dodd; Francis E Tillman; Joy M O'Keefe
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Host traits and environment interact to determine persistence of bat populations impacted by white-nose syndrome.

Authors:  Alexander T Grimaudo; Joseph R Hoyt; Steffany A Yamada; Carl J Herzog; Alyssa B Bennett; Kate E Langwig
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 11.274

4.  Body mass and hibernation microclimate may predict bat susceptibility to white-nose syndrome.

Authors:  Catherine G Haase; Nathan W Fuller; Yvonne A Dzal; C Reed Hranac; David T S Hayman; Cori L Lausen; Kirk A Silas; Sarah H Olson; Raina K Plowright
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Biomarker Metabolites Discriminate between Physiological States of Field, Cave and White-nose Syndrome Diseased Bats.

Authors:  Anna C Doty; A Dan Wilson; Lisa B Forse; Thomas S Risch
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.