Literature DB >> 32054331

Combinatorial Optimization of Clustering Decisions: An Approach to Refine Psychiatric Diagnoses.

Jordan E Loeffelman1, Douglas Steinley1, Cassandra L Boness1, Timothy J Trull1, Phillip K Wood1, Michael J Brusco2, Kenneth J Sher1.   

Abstract

Using complete enumeration (e.g., generating all possible subsets of item combinations) to evaluate clustering problems has the benefit of locating globally optimal solutions automatically without the concern of sampling variability. The proposed method is meant to combine clustering variables in such a way as to create groups that are maximally different on a theoretically sound derivation variable(s). After the population of all unique sets is permuted, optimization on some predefined, user-specific function can occur. We apply this technique to optimizing the diagnosis of Alcohol Use Disorder. This is a unique application, from a clustering point of view, in that the decision rule for clustering observations into the "diagnosis" group relies on both the set of items being considered and a predefined threshold on the number of items required to be endorsed for the "diagnosis" to occur. In optimizing diagnostic rules, criteria set sizes can be reduced without a loss of significant information when compared to current and proposed, alternative, diagnostic schemes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Optimization; alcohol use disorder; cluster analysis; diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32054331      PMCID: PMC8428183          DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1717921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  17 in total

1.  Properties of the Hubert-Arabie adjusted Rand index.

Authors:  Douglas Steinley
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-09

2.  It's the algorithm! Why differential rates of chronicity and comorbidity are not evidence for the validity of the abuse-dependence distinction.

Authors:  Alvaro Vergés; Douglas Steinley; Timothy J Trull; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2010-11

3.  The variance of the adjusted Rand index.

Authors:  Douglas Steinley; Michael J Brusco; Lawrence Hubert
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 4.  Defining substance use disorders: do we really need more than heavy use?

Authors:  J Rehm; S Marmet; P Anderson; A Gual; L Kraus; D J Nutt; R Room; A V Samokhvalov; E Scafato; M Trapencieris; R W Wiers; G Gmel
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.826

5.  Choosing the number of clusters in Κ-means clustering.

Authors:  Douglas Steinley; Michael J Brusco
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2011-09

6.  The harmful dysfunction model of alcohol use disorder: revised criteria to improve the validity of diagnosis and prevalence estimates.

Authors:  Jerome C Wakefield; Mark F Schmitz
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 7.  Reduction of drinking in problem drinkers and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  J Rehm; M Roerecke
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.826

8.  The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample.

Authors:  Bridget F Grant; Deborah A Dawson; Frederick S Stinson; Patricia S Chou; Ward Kay; Roger Pickering
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-07-20       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Truth or consequences in the diagnosis of substance use disorders.

Authors:  Christopher S Martin; James W Langenbucher; Tammy Chung; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 10.  Diagnosis and assessment of alcohol use disorders among adolescents.

Authors:  C S Martin; K C Winters
Journal:  Alcohol Health Res World       Date:  1998
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.