| Literature DB >> 32054230 |
Jia Luo1,2, Yiting Yang1, Kun Liao3, Bin Liu1, Ying Chen4, Linyuan Shen1, Lei Chen1, An'an Jiang1, Yihui Liu4, Qiang Li4, Jinyong Wang5, Xuewei Li1, Shunhua Zhang1, Li Zhu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The QingYu pig is well known for its excellent meat quality attributes in Sichuan province, China. In order to improve its production efficiency, the determination of genetic factors contributing to quantifiable economic traits of livestock is important. Moreover, the cross-breeding of QingYu pigs with western breeds possessing strong growth attributes is an efficient way to improve the performance of this breed.Entities:
Keywords: Carcass and Meat Quality; Crossbred; Genetic Parameter; QingYu Pig; Reproductive
Year: 2019 PMID: 32054230 PMCID: PMC7322648 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.19.0105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Ingredients and nutrients of the basal experiment diets
| Items | 20 to 50 kg | 50 to 120 kg |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredients (g/kg) | ||
| Corn | 700 | 772 |
| Soybean | 270 | 200 |
| CaHPO4 | 9 | 8 |
| Limestone | 8 | 7 |
| Salt | 3 | 3 |
| Lysine | 0.3 | - |
| Premix | 10 | 10 |
| Nutrients | ||
| DE (MJ/kg) | 13.9 | 13.83 |
| CP (g/kg) | 180 | 154 |
| Ca (g/kg) | 6 | 5.2 |
| P (g/kg) | 5 | 4.6 |
| Lysine (g/kg) | 9.5 | 7.5 |
DE, digestible energy; CP, crude protein.
Provided the following (unit/kg): 1,600 mg of Cu, 10,000 mg of Fe, 3,000 mg of Mn, 10,000 mg of Zn, 40 mg of I and 30 mg of Se, 605,000 IU of vitamin A, 155,000 IU of vitamin D3, 1,800 IU of vitamin E, 200 mg of vitamin K3, 300 mg of vitamin B1, 400 mg of riboflavin, 200 mg of vitamin B6, 1.5 mg of vitamin B12, 1,500 mg of pantothenic acid, 2,800 mg of niacin and 12,500 mg of choline.
All data were analyzed values except DE, which was calculated using swine National Research Council (1998) values.
Figure 1Comparison of reproductive characteristics of QingYu pigs in different parity. Different lowercase letters a, b, and c indicate that TNB is significantly different between parity (p<0.05), while the same letter indicates no significant difference; The capital letters A, B, and C showed significant differences in NBA between parity (p<0.05), while the same letter indicates no significant differences.
The heritability and repeatability of reproductive on Qingyu pig
| Traits | n | X̄ | s | h2±SE | re±SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNB | 1,166 | 9.53 | 2.26 | 0.22±0.06 | 0.23±0.05 |
| NBA | 1,154 | 8.83 | 2.18 | 0.11±0.05 | 0.14±0.04 |
| BW | 1,154 | 7.22 | 1.93 | 0.22±0.06 | 0.23±0.05 |
| PBW | 1,154 | 0.81 | 0.12 | 0.18±0.06 | 0.20±0.05 |
| WN | 937 | 8.18 | 1.63 | 0.21±0.09 | 0.22±0.12 |
| WW | 937 | 59.87 | 11.51 | 0.09±0.12 | 0.10±0.09 |
| PWW | 937 | 6.86 | 0.92 | 0.18±0.11 | 0.19±0.12 |
SE, standard error; TNB, total number born; NBA, number born alive; LBW, litter birth weight; PBW, individual birth weight; NW, weaning piglet, LWW, weight of weaning litter; PWW, weaning weight.
Represent significant level at 0.05 (p<0.05).
Genetic and phenotypic correlations between reproductive traits in Qingyu pig
| Items | TNB | NBA | PBW | WN | WW | PWW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNB | - | 0.72±0.11 | −0.43±0.10 | 0.81±0.38 | 0.79±0.09 | −0.69±0.24 |
| NBA | 0.89±0.01 | - | −0.34±0.06 | 0.87±0.23 | 0.48±0.08 | −0.17±0.06 |
| PBW | 0.16±0.06 | −0.26±0.06 | - | 0.28±0.14 | 0.67±0.18 | 0.87±0.21 |
| WN | 0.68±0.05 | 0.25±0.02 | −0.08±0.09 | - | 0.89±0.15 | −0.33±0.15 |
| WW | 0.57±0.06 | 0.03±0.003 | −0.03±0.09 | 0.74±0.04 | - | 0.04±0.01 |
| PWW | −0.12±0.09 | −0.13±0.05 | 0.12±0.09 | −0.32±0.08 | 0.39±0.08 | - |
The above diagonals in the table are the genetic correlations between traits, while the below diagonals are the phenotypic correlations between traits.
TNB, total number born; NBA, number born alive; LBW, litter birth weight; PBW, individual birth weight; NW, weaning piglet; LWW, weight of weaning litter; PWW, weaning weight.
Represents significant level (p<0.05), and
represents extremely significant level (p<0.01).
Comparison of carcass traits between Qingyu pig with BQ pig
| Items | Qingyu | BQ |
|---|---|---|
| n | 6 | 15 |
| Age (d) | 210 | 210 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.58±6.12 | 80.11±5.37 |
| Backfat thickness (cm) | 2.75±0.21 | 2.88±0.58 |
| Loin muscle area (cm2) | 18.35±1.88 | 23.25±4.38 |
| Body length (cm) | 78.00±1.41 | 75.78±2.38 |
| Dressing percentage (%) | 63.31±0.76 | 70.79±2.10 |
| Lean percentage (%) | 50.29±6.23 | 53.32±3.86 |
| Bone percentage (%) | 10.94±1.09 | 11.38±1.47 |
| Sebum percentage (%) | 37.58±7.62 | 30.59±4.71 |
BQ, Berkshire×Qingyu crossbred pigs.
The letters in the table are marked with the same letter indicating no significant difference in carcass characteristics at different weight stages, while different letters indicating significant.
Comparison of meat quality traits between Qingyu pig with BQ
| Items | Qingyu | BQ |
|---|---|---|
| n | 6 | 15 |
| Age (d) | 210 | 210 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.58±6.12 | 80.11±5.37 |
| pH45min | 6.47±0.21 | 6.72±0.19 |
| pH24h | 5.98±0.23 | 5.55±0.08 |
| L45min | 38.03±1.52 | 42.34±1.70 |
| L24h | 42.33±1.82 | 46.15±4.37 |
| Drip loss (%) | 4.56±0.26 | 2.03±.051 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 66.59±3.11 | 65.23±3.21 |
| Marbing | 3.52±0.32 | 2.17±0.5 |
BQ, Berkshire×Qingyu crossbred pigs.
The letters in the table are marked with the same letter indicating no significant difference in carcass characteristics at different weight stages, while different letters indicating significant.
Carcass traits of Berkshire×Qingyu pig crossbred in different body weight
| Items | Weight stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 | |
| Weight (kg) | 70.2±1.64 | 81±1.30 | 92.6±1.52 | 101.6±2.60 |
| Backfat thickness (cm) | 2.52±0.64 | 2.63±0.30 | 2.83±0.52 | 3.03±0.60 |
| Loin muscle area (cm2) | 20.23±5.05 | 24.07±4.91 | 26.82±6.52 | 29.75±7.66 |
| Body length (cm) | 73.4±2.51 | 76.8±1.48 | 81.1±3.75 | 83.7±4.60 |
| Dressing percentage (%) | 70.32±0.02 | 71.45±0.02 | 71.72±0.03 | 70.37±0.01 |
| Lean percentage (%) | 52.84±0.02 | 54.56±0.03 | 47.27±0.01 | 47.53±001 |
| Sebum percentage (%) | 30.45±0.02 | 28.41±0.01 | 37.24±0.02 | 37.18±0.02 |
The letters in the table are marked with the same letter indicating no significant difference in carcass characteristics at different weight stages, while different letters indicating significant.
Figure 2The law of carcass traits and meat quality traits in different body weight. (A) Sebum percentage (%); (B) Lean percentage (%); (C) Marbing; (D) Body length (cm).
Meat quality traits of Berkshire×Qingyu pig crossbred in different body weight
| Items | Weight stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 | |
| pH45min | 6.68±0.34 | 6.69±0.24 | 6.63±0.20 | 6.45±0.33 |
| pH24h | 5.52±0.12 | 5.54±0.09 | 5.60±0.10 | 5.65±0.06 |
| L45min | 44.27±2.06 | 43.15±0.93 | 43.32±2.56 | 43.57±2.40 |
| L24h | 45.69±1.65 | 48.10±4.30 | 47.39±4.40 | 49.19±3.67 |
| Drip loss (%) | 0.03±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 | 0.02±0.01 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 0.62±0.03 | 0.65±0.01 | 0.64±0.02 | 0.64±0.02 |
| Marbing | 1.7±0.27 | 2.00±0.41 | 2.40±0.55 | 2.50±0.61 |
The letters in the table are marked with the same letter indicating no significant difference in carcass characteristics at different weight stages, while different letters indicating significant.