AIMS: Sex differences impact the occurrence, presentation, prognosis, and response to therapy in heart disease. Particularly, the phenotypic presentation of patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) differs between men and women. However, whether the response to mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is influenced by sex remains unknown. We hypothesize that males and females with NIDCM respond similarly to MSC therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male (n = 24) and female (n = 10) patients from the POSEIDON-DCM trial who received MSCs via transendocardial injections were evaluated over 12 months. Endothelial function was measured at baseline and 3 months post-transendocardial stem cell injection (TESI). At baseline, ejection fraction (EF) was lower (P = 0.004) and end-diastolic volume (EDV; P = 0.0002) and end-systolic volume (ESV; P = 0.0002) were higher in males vs. females. In contrast, baseline demographic characteristics, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were similar between groups. EF improved in males by 6.2 units (P = 0.04) and in females by 8.6 units (P = 0.04; males vs. females, P = 0.57). EDV and ESV were unchanged over time. The MLHFQ score, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, endothelial progenitor cell-colony forming units, and serum tumour necrosis factor alpha improved similarly in both groups. CONCLUSION: Despite major differences in phenotypic presentation of NIDCM in males and females, this study is the first of its kind to demonstrate that MSC therapy improves a variety of parameters in NIDCM irrespective of patient sex. These findings have important clinical and pathophysiologic implications regarding the impact of sex on responses to cell-based therapy for NIDCM. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Sex differences impact the occurrence, presentation, prognosis, and response to therapy in heart disease. Particularly, the phenotypic presentation of patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) differs between men and women. However, whether the response to mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is influenced by sex remains unknown. We hypothesize that males and females with NIDCM respond similarly to MSC therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male (n = 24) and female (n = 10) patients from the POSEIDON-DCM trial who received MSCs via transendocardial injections were evaluated over 12 months. Endothelial function was measured at baseline and 3 months post-transendocardial stem cell injection (TESI). At baseline, ejection fraction (EF) was lower (P = 0.004) and end-diastolic volume (EDV; P = 0.0002) and end-systolic volume (ESV; P = 0.0002) were higher in males vs. females. In contrast, baseline demographic characteristics, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), and 6-min walk test (6MWT) were similar between groups. EF improved in males by 6.2 units (P = 0.04) and in females by 8.6 units (P = 0.04; males vs. females, P = 0.57). EDV and ESV were unchanged over time. The MLHFQ score, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, endothelial progenitor cell-colony forming units, and serum tumour necrosis factor alpha improved similarly in both groups. CONCLUSION: Despite major differences in phenotypic presentation of NIDCM in males and females, this study is the first of its kind to demonstrate that MSC therapy improves a variety of parameters in NIDCM irrespective of patient sex. These findings have important clinical and pathophysiologic implications regarding the impact of sex on responses to cell-based therapy for NIDCM. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Jonathan M Hill; Gloria Zalos; Julian P J Halcox; William H Schenke; Myron A Waclawiw; Arshed A Quyyumi; Toren Finkel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeremy L Herrmann; Aaron M Abarbanell; Brent R Weil; Mariuxi C Manukyan; Jeffrey A Poynter; Yue Wang; Arthur C Coffey; Daniel R Meldrum Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: James B Young; Mark E Dunlap; Marc A Pfeffer; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Alain Cohen-Solal; Rainer Dietz; Christopher B Granger; Jaromir Hradec; Jerzy Kuch; Robert S McKelvie; John J V McMurray; Eric L Michelson; Bertil Olofsson; Jan Ostergren; Peter Held; Scott D Solomon; Salim Yusuf; Karl Swedberg Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-10-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Courtney Premer; Arnon Blum; Michael A Bellio; Ivonne Hernandez Schulman; Barry E Hurwitz; Meela Parker; Christopher R Dermarkarian; Darcy L DiFede; Wayne Balkan; Aisha Khan; Joshua M Hare Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 8.143
Authors: Russell G Saltzman; Dushyantha T Jayaweera; Lina V Caceres; Jairo A Tovar; Mayra Vidro-Casiano; Vela Karakeshishyan; Jeanette Soto; Aisha Khan; Raul D Mitrani; Ivonne H Schulman; Joshua M Hare Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-01-07
Authors: Ria Margiana; Alexander Markov; Angelina O Zekiy; Mohammed Ubaid Hamza; Khalid A Al-Dabbagh; Sura Hasan Al-Zubaidi; Noora M Hameed; Irshad Ahmad; R Sivaraman; Hamzah H Kzar; Moaed E Al-Gazally; Yasser Fakri Mustafa; Homayoon Siahmansouri Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 8.079
Authors: Jaqueline S da Silva; Renata G J Gonçalves; Juliana F Vasques; Bruna S Rocha; Bianca Nascimento-Carlos; Tadeu L Montagnoli; Rosália Mendez-Otero; Mauro P L de Sá; Gisele Zapata-Sudo Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 6.600