A Lodhi1, K Waite2, I Alam2. 1. Royal Albert Edwards Infirmary, WWL NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan Lane, Wigan, WN1 2NN, UK. Electronic address: ahmad_lodhi@hotmail.co.uk. 2. Royal Albert Edwards Infirmary, WWL NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan Lane, Wigan, WN1 2NN, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are gallbladder lesions which can progress to gallbladder malignancy. The incidence has been estimated as high as 12.1% of all cholecystectomy patients. Gallbladder malignancy typically presents late, and therefore carries a poor prognosis. By identifying potential GBPs early, it would be possible to treat polyps before they undergo malignant change. The current gold standard for GBP identification is with histological examination which is performed after cholecystectomy. This study sought to assess whether radiological imaging could reliably identify GBPs and therefore guide management. METHODS: 1000 consecutive patients already undergoing cholecystectomy were sampled from two UK hospitals. Patients who underwent ultrasonography and had histological analysis of their gallbladders were selected. Overall 905 patients were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 12 histologically confirmed GBPs in the cohort (1.33%). US correctly detected 1 GBP, with a sensitivity of 8.3% (95% CI 0.2-38.5%) and specificity of 96.0% (95% CI 94.5-97.2%). The overall accuracy was 94.8 (95% CI 93.2-96.2%). CONCLUSION: These data show that US is an ineffective tool for GBP identification. The lack of prior operator exposure, imprecise nature of US and possible obstruction of images from underlying gallstone disease delivered a high rate of false positives. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Surgical or oncological decisions regarding GBPs should not be based upon US findings alone as this would lead to unnecessary interventions. MRI should be investigated as an alternative imaging modality for GBP identification, as its differentiation of soft tissues could guide surgical management.
INTRODUCTION:Gallbladder polyps (GBPs) are gallbladder lesions which can progress to gallbladder malignancy. The incidence has been estimated as high as 12.1% of all cholecystectomy patients. Gallbladder malignancy typically presents late, and therefore carries a poor prognosis. By identifying potential GBPs early, it would be possible to treat polyps before they undergo malignant change. The current gold standard for GBP identification is with histological examination which is performed after cholecystectomy. This study sought to assess whether radiological imaging could reliably identify GBPs and therefore guide management. METHODS: 1000 consecutive patients already undergoing cholecystectomy were sampled from two UK hospitals. Patients who underwent ultrasonography and had histological analysis of their gallbladders were selected. Overall 905 patients were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 12 histologically confirmed GBPs in the cohort (1.33%). US correctly detected 1 GBP, with a sensitivity of 8.3% (95% CI 0.2-38.5%) and specificity of 96.0% (95% CI 94.5-97.2%). The overall accuracy was 94.8 (95% CI 93.2-96.2%). CONCLUSION: These data show that US is an ineffective tool for GBP identification. The lack of prior operator exposure, imprecise nature of US and possible obstruction of images from underlying gallstone disease delivered a high rate of false positives. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Surgical or oncological decisions regarding GBPs should not be based upon US findings alone as this would lead to unnecessary interventions. MRI should be investigated as an alternative imaging modality for GBP identification, as its differentiation of soft tissues could guide surgical management.
Authors: Kieran G Foley; Max J Lahaye; Ruedi F Thoeni; Marek Soltes; Catherine Dewhurst; Sorin Traian Barbu; Yogesh K Vashist; Søren Rafael Rafaelsen; Marianna Arvanitakis; Julie Perinel; Rebecca Wiles; Stuart Ashley Roberts Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 7.034