Literature DB >> 32052150

Reducing complication rates and hospital readmissions while revising the enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) protocol.

Marjolijn Leeman1, Stefanie R van Mil2, L Ulas Biter2, Jan A Apers2, Kees Verhoef3, Martin Dunkelgrun2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To optimize the postoperative phase following bariatric surgery, the enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery pathway (ERABS) has been developed. The aim of ERABS is to create a care path that is as safe, efficient and patient-friendly as possible. Continuous evaluation and optimization of ERABS are important to ensure a safe treatment path and may result in better outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing bariatric surgery over 2014-2017, during which the ERABS protocol was continuously evaluated and optimized.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from patients undergoing a primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy between January 2014 and December 2017. Outcomes were early complications, unplanned hospital revisits, readmissions, duration of surgery and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: 2889 patients underwent a primary bariatric procedure in a single center. There was a significant decrease in minor complications over the years from 7.0 to 1.9% (p < 0.001). Hospital revisit rates decreased after 2015 (p < 0.001). Readmission rates decreased over time (p < 0.001). The mean duration of surgery decreased from 52 (in 2014) to 41 (in 2017) minutes (p < 0.001). Median length of hospital stay decreased from 1.8 to 1.5 days in 2015 (p = 0.002) and remained stable since.
CONCLUSION: An improvement of the ERABS protocol was associated with a decrease in minor complication rates, number of unplanned hospital revisits and readmission rates after primary bariatric procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bariatric surgery; ERABS; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast-track; Gastric bypass; Gastric sleeve

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32052150     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07422-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  3 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery: an Italian consensus statement.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marinari; Mirto Foletto; Carlo Nagliati; Giuseppe Navarra; Vincenzo Borrelli; Vincenzo Bruni; Giovanni Fantola; Roberto Moroni; Luigi Tritapepe; Roberta Monzani; Daniela Sanna; Michele Carron; Rita Cataldo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  The effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery program on lung cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rongyang Li; Kun Wang; Chenghao Qu; Weifeng Qi; Tao Fang; Weiming Yue; Hui Tian
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Perioperative Cost Differences Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Institutional Review.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Murtha; Dillon C Svoboda; Natalie Liu; Morgan K Johnson; Manasa Venkatesh; Jacob A Greenberg; Anne O Lidor; Luke M Funk
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.766

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.