| Literature DB >> 32051812 |
Hao Ding1, Aiyun Zhao1, Lingyun Wang1, Na Gao1, Yangang Sun2, Junqiang Li2, Meng Qi1.
Abstract
Enterocytozoon bieneusi, an obligate intracellular pathogen of the intestinal epithelium, is commonly identified in humans and many other animals and is ubiquitous in water sources and the environment generally. To determine the molecular prevalence of E. bieneusi in edible bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeiana) and evaluate the possibility of its potential zoonotic transmission to humans via food or water, the intestinal contents of 295 bullfrogs were intermittently collected from two open markets in Aksu, China. The samples were screened for the internal transcribed spacer by polymerase chain reaction amplifications, revealing that 20.7% (61/295) of them were infected with E. bieneusi, with no significant differences found between the two sampling locations (p > 0.05). Twenty-two different E. bieneusi genotypes were identified, including one known genotype (EbpC) and 19 novel ones (named BLC1 to BLC19). The zoonotic genotype EbpC was identified in most of the E. bieneusi-positive samples (65.6%, 40/61). The remaining genotypes were identified in either one or three samples each. Our phylogenetic analysis showed that 20 of the E. bieneusi genotypes belonged to Group 1. As far as we are aware, this is the first report of E. bieneusi infections in edible bullfrogs. Our findings suggest that E. bieneusi can be maintained in edible bullfrogs and potentially transmitted via food or water. It is possible that these amphibians are unsuspected zoonotic reservoirs of E. bieneusi.Entities:
Keywords: Bullfrogs; Enterocytozoon bieneusi; Genotype; Zoonotic
Year: 2020 PMID: 32051812 PMCID: PMC7005328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl ISSN: 2213-2244 Impact factor: 2.674
Occurrence and genotype distributions of E. bieneusi pathogens in edible bullfrogs (L. catesbeiana) in Aksu, China.
| Collection sites | Collection time | No. positive/No. examined (%) | Genotypes (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market 1 | Dec 3, 2018 | 1/18 (5.6%) | BLC1 (1) |
| Dec 9, 2018 | 0/11 (0) | ||
| Dec 15, 2018 | 0/16 (0) | ||
| Dec 20, 2018 | 5/15 (33.3%) | EbpC (4), BLC3 (1) | |
| Dec 23, 2018 | 3/19 (15.8%) | EbpC (2), BLC4 (1) | |
| Dec 28, 2018 | 5/13 (38.5%) | EbpC (5) | |
| Subtotal | 14/92 (15.2%) | EbpC (11), BLC1 (1), BLC3 (1), BLC4 (1) | |
| Market 2 | May 20, 2019 | 2/15 (13.3%) | EbpC (1), BLC5 (1) |
| May 26, 2019 | 2/17 (11.8%) | EbpC (1), BLC6 (1) | |
| May 31, 2019 | 5/22 (22.7%) | EbpC (4), BLC7 (1) | |
| Jun 2, 2019 | 4/19 (21.1%) | EbpC (3), BLC8 (1) | |
| Jun 5, 2019 | 1/24 (4.2%) | BLC9 (1) | |
| Jun 9, 2019 | 2/19 (10.5%) | EbpC (2) | |
| Jun 13, 2019 | 2/19 (10.5%) | EbpC (2) | |
| Jun 17, 2019 | 4/14 (28.6%) | EbpC (3), BLC10 (1) | |
| Jun 20, 2019 | 7/21 (33.3%) | EbpC (2), BLC11 (2), BLC12 (1), BLC14 (1), BLC15 (1) | |
| Jun 25, 2019 | 9/18 (50.0%) | EbpC (6), BLC11 (1), BLC16 (1), BLC17 (1) | |
| Jun 28, 2019 | 9/15 (60.0%) | EbpC (5), BLC2 (1), BLC13 (1), BLC18 (1), BLC19 (1) | |
| Subtotal | 47/203 (23.2%) | EbpC (29), BLC2 (1), BLC5 (1), BLC6 (1), BLC7 (1), BLC8 (1), BLC9 (1), BLC10 (1), BLC11 (3), BLC12 (1), BLC13 (1), BLC14 (1), BLC15 (1), BLC16 (1), BLC17 (1), BLC18 (1), BLC19 (1) | |
| Total | 295 | EbpC (40), BLC11 (3), BLC1 (1), BLC2 (1), BLC3 (1), BLC4 (1), BLC5 (1), BLC6 (1), BLC7 (1), BLC8 (1), BLC9 (1), BLC10 (1), BLC12 (1), BLC13 (1), BLC14 (1), BLC15 (1), BLC16 (1), BLC17 (1), BLC18 (1), BLC19 (1) |
Fig. 1Nucleotide sequence analysis of the newly identified E. bieneusi genotypes (BLC1 to BLC19) based on the ITS regions, as compared with the known genotype EbpC (AF135832) (synonym with genotype E).
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree based on Bayesian inference (BI) analysis of E. bieneusi ITS sequences. Statistically significant posterior probabilities are indicated on the branches. Known and novel E. bieneusi ITS genotypes identified in the present study are indicated by hollow and filled triangles, respectively.