| Literature DB >> 32051257 |
Mingrong Lv1,2,3, Wangjie Liu4,5,6, Wangfei Chi7, Xiaoqing Ni1,2,3, Jiajia Wang1,2,3, Huiru Cheng1,8,9, Wei-Yu Li4,5,6, Shenmin Yang10, Huan Wu1,8,9, Junqiang Zhang1,8,9, Yang Gao1,2,3, Chunyu Liu4,5,6, Caihua Li11, Chenyu Yang12, Qing Tan1,8,9, Dongdong Tang1,8,9, Jingjing Zhang1,8,9, Bing Song1,8,9, Yu-Jie Chen1,8,9, Qiang Li1,8,9, Yading Zhong13, Zhihua Zhang14, Hexige Saiyin4, Li Jin4, Yuping Xu1,8,9, Ping Zhou1,8,9, Zhaolian Wei1,8,9, Chuanmao Zhang7, Xiaojin He15,2,3, Feng Zhang16,5,6, Yunxia Cao15,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asthenoteratospermia, one of the most common causes for male infertility, often presents with defective sperm heads and/or flagella. Multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella (MMAF) is one of the common clinical manifestations of asthenoteratospermia. Variants in several genes including DNAH1, CEP135, CATSPER2 and SUN5 are involved in the genetic pathogenesis of asthenoteratospermia. However, more than half of the asthenoteratospermia cases cannot be explained by the known pathogenic genes. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: DZIP1; asthenoteratospermia; centrosome; flagella
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32051257 PMCID: PMC7361034 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Genet ISSN: 0022-2593 Impact factor: 6.318
Figure 1Homozygous DZIP1 mutations identified in men with asthenoteratospermia. (A) A missense mutation c.188G>A (p.Arg63Gln) of DZIP1 was identified in the consanguineous family A029. The proband (IV-1) was homozygous for this mutation (M1). (B) a stop-gain mutation c.690T>G (p.Tyr230*) of DZIP1 was identified in the consanguineous family A033. This mutation (M2) was homozygous in the proband (IV-1), and was confirmed to be inherited form his parental heterozygous carries. (C) These two DZIP1 mutations (M1 and M2) are located at the conserved sites close to the N-terminal. Green and grey squares, respectively, stand for zinc-finger domain and coiled-coil domains as described by the UniProt server. Both mutations were verified by Sanger sequencing. The mutation positions are indicated by yellow boxes. Mutations are annotated in accordance to the Human Genome Variation Society’s recommendations. WT, wild type.
Semen characteristics in men with homozygous DZIP1 mutations
| Semen parameters* | Human subject | Normal value of WHO criteria | |||
| A029 iv-1 | A033 iv-1 | ||||
| Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 1 | Test 2 | ||
| Semen volume (mL) | 6.5 | 7.0 | 1.7 | 2.0 | >1.5 |
| Sperm concentration (106
| 3.2 | 2.8 | 5.3 | 0.7 | >15.0 |
| Total sperm number (106/ejaculate) | 20.8 | 19.6 | 9.0 | 1.4 | >39.0 |
| Motility (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.0 | >32.0 |
| Progressive motility (%) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | >40.0 |
*The normal values of semen parameters were according to the WHO (2010) manual criteria. Semen analyses were performed twice for each subject.
Sperm morphology in DZIP1-mutated men
| Sperm morphology |
| Control men (n=5) |
| Normal flagella (%) | 0 (0–0) | 60.2±6.1 |
| Absent flagella (%) | 95.7 (92.4–99.0) | 2.0±1.1 |
| Short flagella (%) | 4.3 (1.0–7.6) | 5.0±1.7 |
| Coiled flagella (%) | 0 (0–0) | 17.8±3.0 |
| Bent flagella (%) | 0 (0–0) | 16.2±4.6 |
| Irregular flagella (%) | 0 (0–0) | 0.8±0.8 |
*Values represent the mean (range). Five control men were fertile donors who were enrolled from the Anhui Human Sperm Bank.
Figure 2Sperm morphology in DZIP1-mutated men. (A) Normal morphology of a spermatozoon from a healthy control man. (B) to (D) Most spermatozoa of DZIP1-mutated men presented multiple morphological abnormalities, such as very short flagella (B), absent flagella (C) and short flagella (D). scale bar: 5 µm.
Figure 3Immunostaining of DZIP1, IFT88 and IFT140 in human spermatozoa from a healthy control and DZIP1-mutated men. (A) In the fertile control, DZIP1 immunostaining (red) was concentrated in sperm head and sperm neck. However, DZIP1 immunostaining was absent in the spermatozoa from DZIP1-mutated men. (B) IFT88 immunostaining (red) was observed in sperm head and flagellum in the control subject whereas it was dispersive or absent in the spermatozoa from DZIP1-mutated men. (C) IFT140 immunostaining (red) was observed in the middle of sperm head and the flagellum in the control subject, but it was abnormally located in the top of sperm head and sperm neck of the spermatozoa from DZIP1-mutated men. Abnormal axonemes (very short or absent flagella) were showed by abnormal acetylated-α-tubulin staining (A to C, green). All these observations of immunostaining were consistent in the spermatozoa of the two DZIP1-mutated men. scale bar: 10 µm.
Figure 4Immunofluorescence staining of centrin1 showed disorders of centrioles in spermatozoa from the DZIP1-mutated proband A033 IV-1. (A) Spermatozoa from a healthy control man and the proband A033 IV-1 were stained with anti-Centrin1 (green) and anti-acetylated tubulin (red) antibodies. DNA was counterstained with 0.5% DAPI. in the control subject, two angled centriolar dots were observed in sperm neck, and the distal one connected with axoneme. Most spermatozoa of the proband A033 IV-1 presented two centriolar dots with abnormal angle, no concentrated dot, or more than two centriolar dots, and none of them had the well-shaped axoneme. scale bar: 10 µm. (B) to (D) More than 100 spermatozoa from each subject were used for counting Centrin1 dots. In the proband A033 IV-1, more than half of spermatozoa had abnormal numbers of centrioles, and the proportion of spermatozoa with abnormal numbers (n=0 and n>2) of Centrin1 dots was significantly higher than that in the control subject.
Figure 5Severe asthenoteratospermia phenotypes in Dzip1-knockout male mice. (A) The pregnancy rate of heterozygous mutated (Dzip1) and homozygous mutated (Dzip1) male mice. No significant difference in pregnancy rate was observed between the Dzip1 male mice and the WT male mice. but all the Dzip1 male mice were infertile. (B) Sperm counts per epididymis of Dzip1 and Dzip1 male mice. No significant difference in sperm count was observed between WT and Dzip1 male mice, whereas few spermatozoa from the epididymides of Dzip1 male mice were collected. (C) Sperm motility of Dzip1 and Dzip1 male mice. No significant difference in sperm motility was observed between WT and Dzip1 male mice. But spermatozoa from Dzip1 male mice presented no motility. (D) Sperm morphology and histological staining of WT, Dzip1 and Dzip1 male mice under light microscopy. The sperm morphology was normal in WT and Dzip1 male mice. However, most spermatozoa from Dzip1 male mice had severe malformations, such as absent flagella, cytoplasm residual and abnormal heads. In comparison to the WT and Dzip1 male mice, few spermatozoa with normal flagella were observed in seminiferous tubules and epididymis from Dzip1 male mice. Scale bar: 5 µm. abbreviation: NS, no significance; WT, wild type.